1 / 6

Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop

Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop. Lower Columbia Sub-Basin. October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA. Outline. Background Information, e.g.: Number of MPGs Number of Populations Other Factors that Affect the Strategy

leyna
Download Presentation

Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA

  2. Outline • Background Information, e.g.: • Number of MPGs • Number of Populations • Other • Factors that Affect the Strategy (e.g., landscape description, infrastructural opportunities, etc.) • Existing Work (Brief narrative describing overall level of effort) • Overall Strategy • VSP • BiOp Requirements • Habitat Effectiveness • Hatchery Effectiveness • Gaps and Adjustments

  3. Lower Columbia • Number of MPGs – 3 • Coast • Cascade • Gorge • Number of Populations – 111 • Steelhead - 33 • Chinook - 35 • Coho – 25 • Chum - 18

  4. Desired Strategy • Recovery plan guides priorities • Monitoring template • Annual GRTS or census–based surveys of natural and hatchery origin spawner abundance at population scale – facilitates productivity, diversity, & distribution assessments • Annual GRTS-based snorkel surveys of juvenile densities at MPG scale (primarily coho and steelhead) • IMWs where feasible • Life cycle monitoring (adults in & smolts out) in at least one sub-watershed per MPG • Assessment of survey methods above selected adult trapping sites to evaluate survey performance and provide calibrations (e.g. redd to spawner) • Annual GRTS-based habitat surveys at MPG scale • 5 year GRTS-based habitat surveys at population scale

  5. Gaps (Highest Priority) • Chum re-establishment monitor • Expanded juvenile outmigrant monitoring (more sampling locations higher precision) • Expanded fish in/fish out (ditto) • Expanded monitoring of abundance, distribution, & diversity of coho spawners GRTS-based steelhead redd surveys. • Periodic GRTS-based habitat monitoring at population scale in wadeable streams. • Habitat monitoring in non-wadeable streams. • Data management and access. • Improved understanding of accuracy harvest estimates • Expanded coded wire tagging for identification of hatchery origin

  6. Additional Priorities • Maintain existing projects • CWT recovery and analysis • Hood River • Chum monitoring (Washington) • Fund ISTM project • Coordination and identification of habitat effectiveness studies (e.g., Wind River)

More Related