1 / 21

POLI-D-537 Parties and Government in the U.S. 5 ects

POLI-D-537 Parties and Government in the U.S. 5 ects. Emilie van Haute. Week 4. Part I Parties and Politics in the U.S. Outline I.1. Party Eras I.2. Party System I.3. Party Organization Variety of Organizations National Party Organization State Organizations

lester
Download Presentation

POLI-D-537 Parties and Government in the U.S. 5 ects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. POLI-D-537 Parties and Government in the U.S. 5 ects Emilie van Haute Week 4

  2. Part IParties and Politics in the U.S. • Outline • I.1. Party Eras • I.2. Party System • I.3. Party Organization • Variety of Organizations • National Party Organization • State Organizations • Local & County Organizations • Party Activists • I.4. Party Ideology, Issues and Polarization

  3. 1. Variety of Organizations (1) • Variety of forms: What is party organization in the US? • Hierarchical machines dispensing jobs • Issue-oriented individuals • Group of individuals filling formal positions • Candidate’s personal followers • Campaign committee • Large bureaucracy composed of paid professionals • Factors affecting the type of organization • Level of government (local, state, national) • Type of regulations (national, state & local party rules, legal regulations) • Extent of intra-party competition • Bases of party support (nature of the electorate) • Regional / local traditions • General characteristics • Cadre parties > Mass parties • Main activity & task = elections & campaigning • Organization // geographic election districts => precinct, city/town, county, state, national

  4. 1. Variety of Organizations (2)

  5. 1. Variety of Organizations (3) • Organizational structure = Stratarchy • Independent layers & own goals > Hierarchy • Collaboration between layers: reciprocal deference & tolerance (Eldersveld) • No control of the higher layers (no sanctions) • Interdependency: need each other for fund-raising & mobilization • Fragmentation (national level: House & Senate committees autonomous) • Satellite structures: Candidates’ organizations; Party allied groups assisting in fund-raising & mobilization (organized labor, Christian Coalition); professional consultants

  6. 2. National Party Organization (1) • The National Committees • Institutionalization • Mid-1800s: created to manage presidential campaign => active a few months/4y • Interwar period: year-round & ad hoc paid staff but still weak: • Republicans: Hayes (1918-1921): Republican National Committee (RNC) • Democrats: 1928: Democratic National Committee (DNC) • After WWII: Institutionalization • = Full-time staff, professionalization, budget, technology, on Capitol Hill • = Fund-raising, PR, mobilization, national convention management, campaign & training, research & policy development, stimulating party organization • = Inclusive body: represents party organizations of the 50 states • Relation with the other layers (state & local): transformation: • Until 1970s: power & influence at the State level (decentralization) • After: reverse (centralization); cfr flow of money (FECA) • DNC: party rules to designate state delegates • RNC: development of assistance programs

  7. 2. National Party Organization (3)

  8. 2. National Party Organization (4)

  9. 2. National Party Organization (5) • The National Committees • Composition • State delegates: state party organizations select 1 national committeeman & 1 national committeewoman • State party chair (RNC 1960s; DNC 1970s) • = Confederate nature: each state equal representation • DNC 1974: major expansion of the size: • = Representation for elected officials, party auxiliaries, gender balance • = Abandon of the state equality => population & record of support for Democratic candidates • = 212 committee delegates + 112 chairs & higher opposite sex + 75 other = 441 • = ad hoc, informal; lots of subunits (geographical, ideological, candidate, ethnical, gender-based) • RNC: • = still state equality => 55 committeeman + 55 woman + 55 chairs = 165 • = organized, structured, professionalized => formality & order (subunits = geographical + ideological or candidate factions) • => Ratification of the executive committee recommendations

  10. 2. National Party Organization (6) • The National Committees • National Chair • Key role, full-time, especially for the out-party (more effective & influential) • Designation • Until 1980s: presidential nominee designate a national chair at national convention • After: serve until January after elections but presidential nominees install their campaign personnel in key positions • Two styles • Speaking Chair • = Spokesperson, publicity for the party, criticizing opposition • Organizational leaders • = // institutionalization: create headquarters providing services to win elections • - Role • = maintaining sense of party unity (accommodate factions) • = mediator, negotiator • = variable depending on out-party or in-party • - Interaction with White House • NC: Not in charge of presidential campaigns or patronage anymore • Presidents supportive but sometimes want to weaken the NC & concentrate leadership in the White House (Nixon, Carter or Clinton)

  11. 2. National Party Organization (7) • The National Committees • Activities • Fund-Raising: allowed by the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) • = 300 to 400 million in 2004: individual donors (mail or online) + large donors (fund-raising dinners & receptions) • = ‘soft money’ outside FECA: not direct support for candidates but banned in 2002 (Bipartisan campaign Reform Act (BCRA) • Assistance to State & Local Party Organizations • = assistance in developing fund-raising operations, grants to hire professionals, computer assistance, campaign schools, campaign management training, financial & technical assistance to gubernatorial & state legislative candidates, issues research, assistance with redistricting, on the field counseling • Campaign Activities • = support presidential nominees’ campaigns: media ad, get-out-the-vote drives, etc • Communications • = Publications for state & county leaders & activists, media ad & networking • Conventions • = planning & managing national conventions • Research • = issue background; research to weaken the opposition, polls on public opinion • Liaison with White House & administration (in-party)

  12. 2. National Party Organization (8) • The Hill Committees • Congressional Campaign Committee • Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) • National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) • Senatorial Campaign Committee++ • Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) • National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) • Members • = Members of the House & Senate • Organization • = Autonomous from the National Committees • Role • = holding seats (via assistance) • => Focus on competitive races; Safe incumbents or losers: no assistance • = Restrictions on direct money contributions but coordinated expenditures used for technical expertise (polling, campaign ad, media etc.) • = Candidate recruitment & training • = Assistance to fund-raising • But weak influence (not everyone, not a high % of campaign money) • Although nationalization of the agenda

  13. 2. National Party Organization (9) • Party-Allied Groups • Increase in involvement • 1930s-1940s: Democrats: New Deal & labor unions: funds & mobilization • Broadens definition of party organization • Republicans: Americans for Tax Reform, Christian Coalition, National Federation for Independent Business, NRA • Democrats: Congress of Industrialized Organizations, National Education Association, Pro-Choice America, etc. • ‘527’ organizations (tax code): influence campaign via get-out-the-vote efforts • Think Thanks and Consultants • - Think Thanks = Public Policy Research Organizations • Progressive Policy Institute (Ds); Heritage Foundation (Rs) • - Consultants = campaigns (party loyalty): technical/professional skills for polling, research, candidate consulting

  14. 3. State Party Organizations (1) • Evolution of state party organizations • Cycles • End of the 19th – beginning 20th century: patronage-based organizations: • = control over nominations, campaigns, etc. • Progressist movement and party regulations • After 1980s: less control: Candidate-centered environment; no more large-scale patronage; ↑ interparty competition; centralization (national organizations); more organization but supplementary role to the candidate’s own organization • Service agency for candidates & local organizations: signs: • Permanent Headquarters in the state capital, well-equipped • Professional Staffing ,full-time (chair, executive director, field staff, PR director, research staff, fund-raiser, comptroller) => average of 9 but high turnover • Finances: direct-mail fund-raising + traditional methods (dinners, large-contributor programs, allied groups) + sums from national level • Party programs for support of candidates & party building: contributions to candidates, campaign services (polling, fund-raising assistance, seminars, etc.); large-scale voter mobilization programs; party-building activities, technical services => campaigns = candidate > party

  15. 3. State Party Organizations (2) • State Party Law • Great variations in party regulation • 36 States regulate procedures used to select state committee members • 32 States stipulate the composition of state committee • 22 States specify when these committees must meet • 27 States regulate internal rules & procedures • Factors explaining regulation • - Spread of direct primary as principal nominating device for State & Congress • - States enacted laws that defined parties, eligibility to vote for primaries, regulated primaries => regulations made parties public agencies/utilities although ↓ • State Committees (R or D State Central Committee) • Composition determined by state regulation or party by-laws • Elected to represent counties, congressional districts, legislative districts, major municipalities, or party auxiliary groups (Young Rs, Federation of Republican Women, etc.); part-time volunteers • Size: from 20 (Iowa) to > 1.000 (California) • Role • Overseeing the work of the state chair & headquarters staff, Calling of state conventions, adopting party policies & platform, fund-raising, assisting local level • - Executive Committee to carry work between meetings

  16. 3. State Party Organizations (3) • The State Chair • Designation • 73% elected by the state committee; 27% chosen by state party convention • ¾ elected for 2 years terms; average = 4 years; high turnover & lack of continuity • Role • Supervising headquarters staff, conducting fund-raising, recruiting candidates, party spokesperson, link with elected officials, strengthening local organizations, delegates in national committee • The Governor • Role & relation with state party organization • = advisory > controlling state central committee • = influence on selection of party’s state chair • Party organization play supportive role in gubernatorial campaigns (candidate-centered) • = often conflictual but try to coordinate responsibility

  17. 3. State Party Organizations (4) • Differences between parties • Republicans • Stronger, more professionalized, better financed, more capital-intensive • Rely more on party organization for campaigning • Democrats • More labor-intensive • Rely more on allied groups for campaigning • State Legislative Campaign Committees • Composition • - Incumbent legislators • Role • Support legislative candidates (challenge state party committee): provide money, staff, technical services • More active in state with high interparty competition (focus on close races), high campaign costs and weak central committees • Ds // Rs (control legislative chambers)

  18. 4. Local & County Organizations (1) • Evolution of local party organizations • 19th century: city/urban party machine run by the mayor – hierarchy – organization sustained by patronage (distribution of city jobs) => loyalty via material retributions • Today: 3 types • 1. Still party machine in some places (Chicago, Philadelphia, New York) but faded via progressive reforms (secret ballot, primaries, civil service reform) • 2. Well-funded professional local parties based on volunteer work > patronage • 3. No real organization: no bureaucracy, no hierarchy, no permanent headquarter or paid staff, no year-round activity (electoral cycles) • But no decline • Structure • County Committees (Townships; Parishes) • City Committee • Precinct Leader

  19. 5. Party Activists (1) • Incentives to participate • - Material incentives: • Patronage : jobs (in decline) or preferential treatment • Elected office: prestige & power • - Solidarity incentives: friendship, camaraderie • - Outcome incentive: Ideology & issues • Characteristics • - Resources: family, SES => not representative • - Orientations: May’s law of curvilinear disparity • Parties as networks of issue-oriented activists?

  20. 5. Party Activists (2)

More Related