slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
James Richards, William Angliss Institute

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 31

James Richards, William Angliss Institute - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 71 Views
  • Uploaded on

An old chestnut revisited: teachers’ opinions and attitudes toward grading within a competency based training framework. James Richards, William Angliss Institute. Some background to “grading”. The grading of meritorious performance continues after CBT End of 1990’s questions are raised:

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'James Richards, William Angliss Institute' - les


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1
An old chestnut revisited:teachers’ opinions and attitudes toward grading within a competency based training framework

James Richards, William Angliss Institute

some background to grading
Some background to “grading”
  • The grading of meritorious performance continues after CBT
  • End of 1990’s questions are raised:
    • The mission of VET
    • Undermines agreed workplace standards
  • By mid 2000 arguments become silent
why grade
Why Grade?
  • Against: based on perceived negative effect on learners.
  • The role of VET teachers/trainers
  • Two forces driving the need to grade
  • The extent to which employers and HE selection use grades?
who should decide
Who should decide?
  • Industry developed standards
  • Training package developers
  • Individual organisations (teachers)
how to grade
How to grade
  • Generic criteria model
  • The WA experience – a “failure to market”
  • Competency as a developmental continuum
  • Standards referencing approach (specific criterion model)
research question
Research Question:
  • What are teachers’ attitudes and opinions regarding grading within a CBT system?
    • the value of grading
    • The process of grading
    • Differences between operational and management teachers.
methodology
Methodology
  • Exploratory
  • Likert-type survey
results
Results
  • Response rate 68.6%
    • 14 (58.33%) – management teachers
    • 8 (33.33%) – operational teachers
    • 2 (8.33%) - unknown
comments
Comments
  • Agree: Students see a “C” as “I just passed” – and that’s wrong.
  • Strongly disagree: Why should competition create negativity – it should encourage others to do better.
  • Agree: how can you be more competent than competent
  • Strongly disagree: Those learners might be happy with just a “C”.
  • Disagree: teacher should be looking at student’s personal best
slide14

In grading we are trying to satisfy external agents (such as selection for employment, higher education entrance) at the expense of the student’s training needs.(%)

i believe higher grades indicate potential for success in higher education university studies
I believe higher grades indicate potential for success in higher education (university) studies (%)
comments1
Comments
  • “not for employment, higher ed, yes”
  • “grading is only used for higher ed. I have never asked for a student’s results as an employer – I don’t care. What I want is for them to turn up, work well and be passionate”
  • “Employers look for attitude, commitment and integrity – not grades”
comments2
Comments
  • Disagree: lack of consistency between teachers’ grades makes a mockery of grading. I labour over grading to the point that it becomes very stressful
  • Strongly agree: Encourages good students to do extra learning, put in more effort.
  • Don’ know: perhaps management units – not operational.
the process of grading
The process of grading
  • Continue to next slide
comments3
Comments
  • Disagree: We do not, cannot replicate the workplace
  • Disagree: …teachers can interpret rubrics in their own way.
slide23
Because of my industry experience I can accurately judge performance at higher levels without the need for a rubric
comments4
Comments
  • Don’t know: industry is not a consistent beast
  • Strongly disagree: A rubric is essential to quantify competencies, skills ..a gut feeling is simply not enough
it is essential to have good industry experience in providing meaningful grades to students
It is essential to have good industry experience in providing meaningful grades to students
comments5
Comments
  • Strongly agree: Its taking the fun out of teaching
  • Strongly agree: Too many versions of what we are supposed to be doing – which one is correct?
  • Disagree: ..we just need to agree on a uniform approach
there should be two assessment events one that determines c nyc and a second to determine the grade
There should be two assessment events: one that determines C/NYC, and a second to determine the grade
comments6
Comments
  • Strongly disagree: Too labour intensive – teachers would not support this consistently
  • Disagree: prefer no grading at all
  • Strongly agree: …teachers apply superior to what should be competent because of the low standard of student performance: it is “outstanding” to see a student complete all competencies