1 / 11

A Stackhouse , M Nilsen, C Nielsen IRPA13 - 14 May 2012

Comparison of Provisions for Exclusion and Exemption of NORM radionuclides associated with the North Sea Oil and Gas Industries. A Stackhouse , M Nilsen, C Nielsen IRPA13 - 14 May 2012. Contents. Brief overview of North Sea and NORM Who has undertaken the comparison and why

leona
Download Presentation

A Stackhouse , M Nilsen, C Nielsen IRPA13 - 14 May 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comparison of Provisions for Exclusion and Exemption of NORM radionuclides associated with the North Sea Oil and Gas Industries A Stackhouse, M Nilsen, C Nielsen IRPA13 - 14 May 2012

  2. Contents • Brief overview of North Sea and NORM • Who has undertaken the comparison and why • On overview of the similarities and differences • Reason for differences • Practical implications • Conclusions for developing legislation in the future

  3. North Sea Areas Approx 1300 installations in the North Sea Majority are in UK and Norwegian waters

  4. North Sea NORM Regulators Working Group • Members • UK members, (SEPA, DECC, EA) • Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority • National Institute for Radiation Protection (Denmark) • Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Germany (BfS) • Purpose • Share best practice and information of common interest • Harmonise approach as far as possible • Consider joint research

  5. Lead-210 1 Bq g-1 5 Bq g-1 10 Bq g-1 Excluded Exempt (to landfill) if dose assessment demonstrates doses are acceptable Permit required (no restrictions on type of disposal facility) UK UK Permit required, either from NRPA or Pollution Control Agency. Any type of disposal facility acceptable provided total activity <10 kBq Waste must be sent to a repository Excluded Norway Norway Solid wastes Denmark: permit is required if Pb-210 > 5 Bq/g No exemptions or restrictions on what may be permitted

  6. Radium-226 Radium-228 0.5 Bq g-1 1 Bq g-1 5 Bq g-1 5 Bq g-1 10 Bq g-1 10 Bq g-1 Excluded Excluded Exempt if total activity < 50GBq must be sent to landfill Exempt (to landfill) if dose assessment demonstrates doses are acceptable Exempt (to landfill) if dose assessment demonstrates doses are acceptable Permit required (no restrictions on type of disposal facility) Exempt if total activity < 50 GBq must be sent to landfill Permit required (no restrictions on type of disposal facility) UK UK UK UK Waste must be sent to a repository Excluded Excluded Permit required, either from NRPA or Pollution Control Authority. Any type of disposal facility acceptable provided total activity <100 kBq Permit required, either from NRPA or Pollution Control Agency. Any type of disposal facility acceptable provided total activity <10 kBq Waste must be sent to a repository Norway Norway Norway Norway 1 Bq g-1 Denmark: permit is required if Ra-226 > 0.5 Bq/g or if Ra-228 > 1 Bq/g No exemptions or restrictions on what may be permitted

  7. Liquids • Very different approaches • UK has bespoke assessments and radionuclide specific values in Bq/l • Norway has supplemented concentration values with total activities • Denmark has same values as for solids but reporting is mandatory

  8. Summary - Reasons for differences • Legislation based on different international requirements/guidance • EC RP122 • IAEA RS-G-1.7 • Basic Safety Standards Exemption values • Bespoke assessments carried out by some countries • Practical considerations • Industries affected and quantity of waste generated • past practice • available disposal routes has an influence

  9. Conclusions • Close alignment regarding approach to clearance of solids in North Sea area • However, regulatory requirements on wastes that are subject to regulation quite different • For a consistent and harmonised approach it is important to work together on international legislation and standards – but this close working needs to continue during implementation into national law • Not always easy!

  10. Thank you for listening

More Related