1 / 65

Proper Name Plurals in Orizaba Nawatl ( nlv )

Proper Name Plurals in Orizaba Nawatl ( nlv ). David Tuggy ILV-Mexico. I have run up against an interesting construction in a language I work with. A lot of people don’t seem to be aware of it ( though it has certainly been described and discussed by some ) , even though it is

lenka
Download Presentation

Proper Name Plurals in Orizaba Nawatl ( nlv )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Proper Name Plurals in Orizaba Nawatl(nlv) David TuggyILV-Mexico

  2. I have run up against an interesting construction in a language I work with. • A lot of peopledon’tseemtobeaware of it(thoughit has certainlybeendescribed and discussedbysome), eventhoughitis • widespread in theworld • very natural (once you come tothinkaboutit) • likelytobeuseful (once you come tothinkaboutit) • Onenameforitis “associativeplurality”

  3. Associative Plurality • It shows up clearly (and for many languages only) when a proper name is pluralized. • Forinstance, a standard plural in Orizaba Nawatl (=ON, nlv) is–tih, and the plural nameSamueltihdoesnot mean “peoplenamed Samuel”, but “Samuel and hisbunch.” • Thatiswhatassociativeplurality looks like.

  4. Associative Plurality • Onthismap (from WALS.36A) bluedots show whereassociativeplurality has beenreported

  5. Associative Plurality • As you can see, itiswidespread. • Theothercolorsindicateassociativesthataren’talsoused as plurals. White = no associativereported.

  6. Associative Plurality • Itsnaturalnessisfurtherattestedbythefactthatitseemsto pop up more orlessindependently in languagesthat do nothaveit as a regular feature. Forinstance: • English: TheAlberts= Uncle Albert and hisfamily (in a child’sspeech) • French: Les Margaret = GeoffNathan & Margaret Winters • Spanish: En la época de los Borja = back when Borja and hiscontemporarieswerethestarsplayingfootball (soccer) [Apellido>Name>Apellido?] • Spanish: Los Chuchos = followers of (candidate) JesúsHernándezOchoa.

  7. Associative Plurality in Nawatl • Here are someexamples of howassociativeplurality shows up in ON. • New͎itzeh n ichpopochtihkoxamoyonder.they.comethegirlswhethertlahtlaniskehinka n Samueltih. they.will .askwith.themthe Samuel-s • “Thosegirlsovertherethat are headingthisway are probablygoingtoaskafter Samuel and hisfriends.” • (Itmightalsobe Samuel & hisfamily; probablynot Samuel & hispoliticalparty.)

  8. Associative Plurality in Nawatl • Mokniitzkuihnimanyeh se your.sibling his.dog immediately.heone n Simontihkipiah.theSimons they.have.it • “Your brother’s dog is just like one of Simon’s family’s.” • (The chances of itbeing a family are raisedbythe cultural awarenessthatmostothergroupingsdon’towndogs.)

  9. Associative Plurality in Nawatl • Nahuatldoesnotmarkplurality as consistentlyas do someotherlanguages • Astaiknekahki n toahsiampah; until yonder is the our.common.boundary • ompainw͎ansemonamiki n Migelthere with.themwe.meet.each.other the Michael“Our common boundary is over there; that’s where our land borders on Michael’s family’s land” • Migeldoesnotbear a plural suffix. • Thepluralityissignalledonlybythe post-positionalwordinw͎an‘withthem’.

  10. Why Use Associative Plurals? • Fortherest of thistalkI’dliketoconsiderthenotion of whyspeakersmight decide todo this. • Itis no accidentthatassociativeplurality centers onpluralizedNames (=propernouns). • ThisisbecauseNames and plurals are bytheirverydefinitionsopposing, or incompatible, concepts.

  11. General comments • Whenyouputtwonotions (A & B) together in yourmindtoform a complexwhole, youmight do one of threethings: • Make A your “main” idea and fit B toit, ortheotherwayaround. (“Main” idea = ± ‘head’.) • Makeeachadapta bit tofittheother (can = unclearheadship) • Buildsomethingratherdifferentfrom (thoughnotunrelatedto) either(=exocentricity) • Thesestrategies grade intoeachother

  12. General comments • A surprisingamount of syntacticstructureiscoveredbythese simple possibilities. • The ideas joined are almostalwaysdifferent (otherwisewhybotherjoiningthem), butoften are quite compatible. • Whenthey are incompatible theywillnotfittogether in thewayyoumightexpect, so something has togive.

  13. General comments • Either A has tobechanged so it can fitwith B in theexpectedway • or B has tobechangedtofitwith A • oreach has to “give” a littletilltheyfit. • Oryoumaybeableto come up withanunexpectedwayto combine them so thattheyfitcompatibly. • Or, of course, youmayjustrefusetoputthetwo ideas together at all.

  14. Proper Names vs. Plurals • Propernames (=Names) and plurals, I am claiming, are incompatible. • Languagesseemtotake at leastthreetacksregardingthissituation. • Somesimplydon’tallowNamestobepluralized. • SomechangetheName so itfitseasily in the plural construction • Somechangethe Plural so itdoesn’tcontradicttheName

  15. Proper Names and Plurals • Both a plural and a Nameevokestronglythenotion of a group of prominentlyconceived individual Things.

  16. Proper Names and Plurals • Buttheymake incompatible additionstothatbasicnotion.

  17. Proper Names • A Nameassumeseach of thoseThingsisseparatelylabeled, thusdifferent in theirmostrelevant (and ∴ prominent) characteristic

  18. Proper Names • Thenamethen singles outfromthegrouptheoneThingwiththe particular pronounced (orwritten) label.

  19. Plurals • A plural, bycontrast, construesthe individual Things as havingthesamecharacteristics (thuseffectively similar) and designatesthegroup of them.

  20. Plurals • Thecharacteristicssharedbytheindividualswithinthe plural group are expectedtobespecifiedbythe nominal stemwithwhichthe plural affixiscombined.

  21. Plurals • That nominal stemthusfunctionsnot as an individual Thingbut as a type, whichisexpectedtobeinstantiated in manyindividuals.

  22. Plural overrides Name • Onewaytopluralize a Nameistokeepthespecifications of the Plural intact, and forcetheNametofitthem.

  23. Plural overrides Name • Thismakes (coerces) theNameinto a Type, withmultipleinstantiations • Thiscontradictsitsownspecificationthatitdesignates a unique individual.

  24. Plural overrides Name • Thisiswhathappens in English: ifyousay “theCarolyns” you mean “thegirls/women (all) namedCarolyn”.

  25. Plural overrides Name • “BeingnamedCarolyn” isthedefiningcharacteristicforthe new Type of Thing.

  26. Plural overrides Name • (Otherkinds of constructions can effect similar coercions. Forinstance, ifyousay, “[she looks like] a Carolyn” youconverttheNameinto a typewhich can bemodifiedbyanindefinitearticle. • Only in this case thetypespecifiessomeothercharacteristics —presumably visual ones— besidesjusthavingthename. • Ifyouweretosay “theCarolyn”, thatwould come veryclosetojustsaying “Carolyn”.)

  27. Making Plural fit Name • Butwhatif, instead of changingName so itfitswhat Plural expects, wechange Plural so Namefitsbetter?

  28. Making Plural fit Name • Wecouldabandonboth • (a) thespecificationthattheThings in the Plural group are alike and • (b) theprofiling of thegroup as a whole.

  29. Making Plural fit Name • Thenthetwo ideas wouldbe so compatible as tobealmostidentical, • Plural wouldaddnothingtoName, so whybotherto combine them?

  30. Making Plural fit Name • Itis more likelytobeusefultodroptherequirement of alikeness, butkeepthedesignation of a group, lettingitoverrideName’sspecification of an individual.

  31. Making Plural fit Name • Thisisessentiallywhathappens in anassociative plural. • Thecombinationdesignates a groupwithinwhichtheNamedThingisprominent.

  32. Making Plural fit Name • Therelationshiponthebasis of whichtheassociationisformedisnotspecified, at least in themostschematicversions of theconstruction.

  33. Making Plural fit Name • In the “true” plural, of course, therelationshipisone of similarityoreffectiveequality, of sharing of theessentialcharacteristicsspecifiedbythenounstem.

  34. Making Plural fit Name • This, however, has beenspecificallynegated in the case of theassociative plural.

  35. Making Plural fit Name • Thisdoesnot mean theassociatedthings are different in allimportantrespects. Itdoes mean anyimportantsharedcharacteristics are notthosedesignatedbytheName.

  36. Making Plural fit Name • Names, of course, mosttypically are usedtodesignatehumans. (Naming of places, computerprograms, etc., are secondaryusages.)

  37. Making Plural fit Name • So, quite naturally, theprototypicalcollectiveName-plural constructionalsospecifieshumans. • (In fact I have no clear ON exampleswith non-humans)

  38. Making Plural fit Name • Althoughthesehumans are alike in beinghuman, theyhavedifferentnames, and a nameiswhatisdesignatedbythestem.

  39. Making Plural fit Name • So theassociativegroupisestablishedonthebasis of someotherrelationships. • Typicallythey are therelationshipsthattypicallygrouphumans. • Kinship • Friendship • SharedActivities • Nearness • Hierarchy(e.g.boss-peon) • Etc.

  40. Making Plural fit Name • Userscountoncontexttoconstrainthelikelihoodthatonerelationshipratherthananothershouldbeadopted • (as in theexampleswesawearlier.)

  41. Associative-plural lookalikes • There are a couple of othercommonphenomenathat are very similar tothiscollective plural structure. • Seeingthesimilaritiesand differ-encesmaybeinstruc-tive.

  42. Doing “dishes” • In (my) Englishtheworddishbyitselfmostprominentlymeans “a plate”. • Butthe plural dishescan mean either “a group of plates” (a normal plural), or

  43. Doing “dishes” • dishes can mean “dishes and (/or?) other similar types of things”, prominentlyincludingglasses, silverware, pots and pans and cookingutensils.

  44. Doing “dishes” • Thisismuchlikeanassociative plural. There are differenceshowever. • Ratherthanthestemdesignatingan individual and the plural a collection of individuals, bothdesignatea type anda collectionof types.

  45. Doing “dishes” • Thereis a strongtendencyforusageswiththismeaningtooccur as part of certain set phrases, including “do thedishes”, “washthedishes”, “dirtydishes”, and so forth.

  46. Doing “dishes” • Thereissomethingcertainlyrighttosayingthatdish has acquired a schematicmeaning “thingassociatedwithfoodpreparation (whichmayneedwashing)”. • Thatmeaningislimitedtothe plural constructionand isfavoredbyother more extensiveconstructionsconcurrently (e.g. “washthe ____es”).

  47. Doing “dishes” • Acquiringsuch a more schematicsense as part of a polysemicstructureisone of thestandardways lexical itemsdevelop.

  48. Doing “dishes” • Manywords in manylanguagesgeneralize in similar ways. • E.g. in Nawatlƛāka can mean “man (adulthumanmale)” or “humanbeing”. • Thelattermeaningispracticallylimitedto plural forms and favorsconstructionslikenochiƛākah ‘allmen (= humans)’

  49. “Plural” pronouns • Anotherassociative-plural look-alikeiswhat are traditionallycalled “plural pronouns”. • LikeNames, singular pronounsdesignate a single individual out of a group. • Particularlyrelevanthere are 1st and 2ndpersonpronouns. They are definedbyspecific roles in the “communicationsituation” (akathe “epistemicground”, etc.)

  50. “Plural” pronouns • 1stperson singular designatesthe individual communicating (prototypically, speaking) • 2ndperson singular, of course, designatesthe individual towhomthatcommunicationisdirected.

More Related