1 / 25

Progressive Addition Lens and Dispensing

Progressive Addition Lens and Dispensing. Faculty Aravind School of Optometry. History. Benjamin Franklin invented bifocal in 1784. Owen Ave developed first patent PAL in 1907. ESSILOR launched commercially first in 1959. 150 designs introduced till now.

leila-arnold
Download Presentation

Progressive Addition Lens and Dispensing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Progressive Addition Lensand Dispensing Faculty Aravind School of Optometry

  2. History • Benjamin Franklin invented bifocal in 1784. • Owen Ave developed first patent PAL in 1907. • ESSILOR launched commercially first in 1959. • 150 designs introduced till now. • 70 designs are currently available.

  3. PAL markings

  4. Optical Design • Aspheric front surface provides power progression. • Progression determines - the length of the intermediate zone, - the position of near addition and - the gradient of peripheral lens aberrations. • Peripheral surface to provide the comfortable down-gaze vision. • Advance designs are in transitions from ‘harder’ to ‘soft’.

  5. ‘Hard’ Design Rapid intermediate progression. A steeper peripheral aberration in small zones. Wider near and distance zones. Short and narrow progressive zone. ‘Swimming' effect visual experience. Slow adaptation. ‘Soft’ Designs Slower intermediate progression. Wider intermediate zone. Better for higher-add power. Quick adaptation. PAL - Designs

  6. Symmetrical Pattern Available but are less common. Right and Left lenses are identical. 10* lens rotation requires for nasal decentration. An induced vertical prismatic effect cause poor adaptation. Asymmetrical Pattern Incorporate a nasal offset of the near addition. Vertical prismatic effect is minimized. Better adaptation and visual comfort. Pattern of PALs

  7. Contour Plot ? • A most common method to represent PAL design. • Describes the lens front surface power & zones (indicated by contour lines) • CP shows the size of • the distance, - intermediate and near zones - peripheral zone. • Contour lines to indicate bands of constant surface power (0.5D /1.0D intervals). • Narrow contour lines indicate a rapid progression. • Only provides information on the relative ‘hardness’ and ‘softness’ of a design.

  8. PAL measurements

  9. Recommending the PAL • PAL provides the various range of focus to presbyopes. • Many Presbyopes are suited to use PAL. • Consider the patient’s visual needs and refractive status.

  10. Who is suitable for PAL? • Early presbyopes. • Constant bifocal wearers. • Specific needs of intermediate vision. • Near vision requirements on up-gaze. • Person who needs cosmetic protection .

  11. PAL can be avoided to… • Anisometrope - greater than 2.5D in spherical power - greater than 1.75D in cylindrical power • Near addition above in 4.00D • Person having an inadequate vision with best correction. • Person who having pathological changes. • Patients with shaky/unsteady heads. • Vertical facial symmetry and vertical heterophorias.

  12. Refraction and PAL • An accurate Rx is success with PAL. • An inaccurate Rx makes difficult to see clearly with normal head posture. • To confirm the final Rx,use the supplementary tests. (JCC,Duochrome,Astigmatic dial,etc.,) • Commonly used working distance(40cm)is to be considered for clearest near vision.

  13. Dispensing PALs – Frame selection • Metal frame with adjustable pads is a good option. • Facial measurements must be taken for correct fit. • Frame height require to ensure adequate area for distance & near. - at least 22mm below and - at least 14mm above from the pupillary center. • Frame shape also to be considered for near vision.

  14. Dispensing PAL -Frame adjustments The following adjustments need to be confirmed before PD marking. • Frame level • Pantoscopic tilt • Facial wrap • Temple length • Vertex distance

  15. Dispensing PALs – PD measurements • Monocular PD is more important. • Measures from the center of nose to the center of the pupil. • Methods include Pupillometer PD ruler Direct pupillary reflex marking method.

  16. Dispensing PALs – frame verification • Verify frame level with lay-out card followed PD markings. • Make sure that frame is suitable for PAL, before fitting.

  17. How to see the invisible markings? • Reflecting light from the overhead lights off the lens surface. • Simplest way is to hold the PAL 10-15 cm in front of this striped grid.

  18. Fitting procedures of PAL • Frame selection • Monocular PD measurements • Frame mark up • Verify the fitting heights • Lens fitting under auto process • Final verification

  19. Verification of finished PAL spectacle • Pre-delivery verification Identify the lens markings that properly aligned. Check the lens power. Check the fitting heights. Verify the monocular PD with lay-out card. • On-eye verification Check frame fit Check the position of markings with patient’s eye Check the vision and posture. Remove the ink markings.

  20. Possible errors with PAL • Incorrect PD measurements. • Incorrect fitting heights. • Inaccurate refraction. • Inappropriate frame selection and fit. • Base curve changes.

  21. Problems and their possible causes • Distance blur vision Fitting height too high. Over ‘+’ correction / under ‘-’ correction. Astigmatism • Near blur vision Fitting height too low. Increased vertex distance. Incorrect prescription of near add and distance Rx. Insufficient pantoscopic tilt. Base curve of the lens.

  22. Problems and their possible causes • Head tilt back at distance • over ‘-’ correction / under’+’correction. • Incorrect Rx. • Head tilt back at near or intermediate • Incorrect Rx. • Fitting height too low.

  23. Problems and their possible causes • Head tilt forward at distance Fitting height too high. • Head tilt forward at near or intermediate Incorrect Rx. Over ’+’correction.

  24. Key points to success with PALs • An accurate refraction. • Correct size frame and adjustments • An accurate monocular PD measurements. • Perfect fitting. • Proper instruction on use. • Motivate the patient to adapt the new type of vision.

  25. Thank You

More Related