1 / 23

the LATINO movement

the LATINO movement. 1960S HISTORY  OTHER SOCIAL MOVEMENTS. SALSBERRY. LATINOS IN AMERICA. THE LATINO PRESENCE GROWS In the 1960s , the Latino population in the United States grew from 3 million to more than 9 million.

lavonn
Download Presentation

the LATINO movement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. the LATINO movement 1960S HISTORY  OTHER SOCIAL MOVEMENTS SALSBERRY

  2. LATINOS IN AMERICA THE LATINO PRESENCE GROWS • In the 1960s, the Latino population in the United States grew from 3 million to more than 9 million. • People from Mexico, Puerto Rico, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Central America, and South America. Map of Latin America

  3. LATINOS IN AMERICA WHY DID THEY COME HERE? • Better paying jobs • To be braceros(temporary laborers) • Freedom from a corrupt government • Escaping Civil War • Escaping chronic poverty Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia

  4. BRACEROS Braceroson a train from Mexico City headed for the United States

  5. LATINOS IN AMERICA WHERE WERE THEY IN THE U.S.? • Southwest • East Coast HOW WERE THEY TREATED IN THE U.S.? • Faced ethnic prejudice and discrimination in jobs and housing. • Most lived in segregated barrios (Spanish-speaking neighborhoods). • The Latino jobless rate was nearly 50% higher than that of whites

  6. LATINOS FIGHT FOR CHANGE THE FARM WORKER MOVEMENT • Thousands of Latinos did backbreaking work for little pay and few benefits. • A lot of them wanted to unionize (bargain as a group) • What they wanted • Equal opportunities • Better employment opportunities • Better working conditions • Respect for their culture and heritage • Assimilation (to become a part of the dominant culture)

  7. CÉSAR CHÁVEZ LEADER OF THE FARM WORKER MOVEMENT • Urged California farm workers to unionize and group together • Merged with the Filipino agricultural union to form the United Farm Workers Organizing Committee (UFWOC) • Led a boycott against California grape growers • Believed in using non-violence

  8. STRATEGIES STRATEGIES USED BY THE FARM WORKER MOVEMENT • Marched • Picketed • Went on strike • Fasted • Boycotted

  9. SUPPORTERS SUPPORTERS OF THE UFWOC • Other union members • Teenagers • Senator Robert F. Kennedy Senator Robert F. Kennedy and Cesar Chavez

  10. PRIDE AND POWER CULTURAL PRIDE • The activities of the California farm workers helped to inspire other Latino “brown power” movements. • School walkouts • Some of these movements were militant • Federal Alliance of Land Grants • Brown Berets Above: the Brown Berets lead a school walkout for more cultural classes Left: “Chicano” was a shortening of Mexicano”

  11. PRIDE AND POWER POLITICAL POWER • As a result of this new respect, 8 Hispanic Americans served in the House and 1 Hispanic American served in the Senate during the 1960s • Some worked within the system • Mexican American Political Association (MAPA) • Others created their own system • La RazaUnida (The People United) ¡El pueblo unido jamás será vencido!

  12. the native-AMERICAN movement 1960S HISTORY  OTHER SOCIAL MOVEMENTS SALSBERRY

  13. NATIVE AMERICANS IN AMERICA HOW WE SAW THEM

  14. NATIVE AMERICANS IN AMERICA THE REALITY • Hundreds of distinct tribes • What they all shared was a bleak existence in the U.S. • Poorest Americans; highest unemployment rate • Death rate was nearly twice the national average Indian Reservation

  15. BACKGROUND OF THE MOVEMENT 1954 “INDIAN TERMINATION POLICY” • Indians were relocated from isolated reservations into mainstream American life • Terrible failure • Completely ignored the sovereignty (right to independent authority) of the different tribes • What else did they ignore?

  16. BACKGROUND OF THE MOVEMENT 1961 DECLARATION OF INDIAN PURPOSE • Stressed determination • Ended termination program • Wanted to create economic opportunities for Native Americans on their reservations 1968 NATIONAL COUNCIL ON INDIAN OPPORTUNITY • Promised to ensure that progress and reform would be made

  17. AMERICAN INDIAN MOVEMENT (AIM) 1968 AMERICAN INDIAN MOVEMENT • Militant organization • Self-defense group against police brutality • Branched out to include protecting rights • Youth movement “Remember Wounded Knee”

  18. THE MOVEMENT WHAT PROBLEMS THEY SAW • Unhappy with the lack of reform • Lack of autonomy (ability to control and govern one’s own life) GOALS • Self determination • They did not want to assimilate / become part of the dominant culture. • Take back Native American lands (for some) • They wanted respect for their culture Self determination – is it a right or how it ought to be?

  19. MILITANT ACTIONS 1972 TRAIL OF BROKEN TREATIES • Washington D.C. • Protesting U.S. government’s treaty violations throughout history • Wanted the restoration of 110 million acres of land • Wanted to get rid of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) • Caused $2 million in damage

  20. OCCUPATIONS Wounded Knee, South Dakota (1973)

  21. OCCUPATIONS Alcatraz Island (1968)

  22. VICTORIES LEGISLATIVE VICTORIES • 1972 Indian Education Act • 1975 Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act • These acts gave tribes greater control over their own affairs and over their children’s education. LAND CLAIM VICTORIES • New Mexico • Sacred Blue Lake • 1971 Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act • $962 million in cash • 40 million acres

  23. LEGACY 1979 Maine Implementing Act provides $81.5 million for native tribes, including Penobscot and Passamaquoddy, to buy back land 1988 U.S. awards Puyallup tribe $162 million for land claims in Washington 1980 U.S. awards Sioux $106 million for illegally taken land in South Dakota

More Related