1 / 17

BC Notaries Annual Spring Conference April 21 and 22, 2012

BC Notaries Annual Spring Conference April 21 and 22, 2012. Potential U Undue Influence. D. Peter Ramsay, Q.C. Ramsay Lampman Rhodes Nanaimo, BC. Undue Influence. Sets aside transfers for money or gifts Sets aside Wills or part of a Will

lara
Download Presentation

BC Notaries Annual Spring Conference April 21 and 22, 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BC Notaries Annual Spring ConferenceApril 21 and 22, 2012 Potential U Undue Influence D. Peter Ramsay, Q.C. Ramsay Lampman Rhodes Nanaimo, BC

  2. Undue Influence • Sets aside transfers for money or gifts • Sets aside Wills or part of a Will • Elderly susceptible • WESA s. 52

  3. Background British Columbia Law Institute • Multidisciplinary project committee • Report: “Recommended Practices of Wills Practitioners Relating to Potential Undue Influence: A Guide” • Online at BCLI Website www.beli.org • Guide 45 pages • Reference Aid 4 pages

  4. Which Statement Best Describes ...Undue Influence in Relation to Making a Will? • Actual violence or forcible confinement • Any pressure put on a Will-maker to leave a gift to someone • Circumstances such that the Will does not express the independent wishes of the Will-maker

  5. I Clicker

  6. The Practical Problem How does someone who wants to challenge a Will or part of a Will on the grounds of undue influence prove the undue influence? Present law: The challenger must prove undue influence.

  7. WESA s. 52... If a person claims a Will or provision in a Will resulted from another person, • being in a position where there was potential for dependence or domination, and • Using the position to unduly influence the Will-maker

  8. ...WESA s. 52 Establishes the other person was in a position where the potential for dependence or domination was present Then the Person defending Will or gift in the Will must show no undue influence.

  9. Show a Relationship  undue influence presumed  must be disproved

  10. Result • More challenges to Wills or gifts in a Will • Will-drafter (Notary/lawyer) more likely called as a witness • Need to look even more carefully for “red flags.” • Keep thorough and complete notes.

  11. B.C.L.I. Reference Aid 2 Parts  Check list  Red flags

  12. Checklist... • Interview Will-maker alone (Basic Rule). • Ask non-leading, open-ended questions to determine factors operating on Will-maker’s mind. • Explore whether Will-maker is in a relationship of dependency, domination, or special confidence or trust.

  13. ...Checklist... • Explore whether Will-maker is a victim of abuse or neglect in other contexts. • Obtain relevant information from third parties when possible and if the Will-maker consents. • Obtain medical assessment if mental capability is also in question, but remember that mental capacity to make a Will is ultimately a legal test.

  14. ...Checklist • Compile list of events or circumstances indicating undue influence. • Make and retain appropriate records whenever red flags are present. • If Index of Suspicion remains high after reasonable investigation, decline retainer to prepare the Will.

  15. Red Flags... • Will-maker investing significant trust and confidence in a person who is a beneficiary or who is connected to a beneficiary (e.g., lawyer, doctor, clergy, financial advisor, accountant, formal or informal caregiver, new “suitor,” or partner) • Isolation of Will-maker resulting in dependence on another for physical, emotional, financial , or other needs • Physical, psychological, and behavioural characteristics of Will-maker

  16. ...Red Flags • Circumstances related to making of the Will and/or the terms • Characteristics of influencer in Will-maker’s family or circle of acquaintance • Practitioner’s “gut feeling”

  17. Undue Influence D. Peter Ramsay, Q.C. Ramsay Lampman Rhodes Nanaimo, BC

More Related