US 301 Waldorf: A Strategic Approach to Environmental Stewardship

1. US 301 Waldorf:A Strategic Approach to Environmental Stewardship Green Infrastructure Network Design & Optimization The Conservation Fund Will Allen, Director of Strategic Conservation wallen@conservationfund.org 919-967-2223 ext 124 http://www.conservationfund.org/strategic_conservation August 2010

2. The Strategic Approach • Framework for Environmental Stewardship • The Conservation Fund, Maryland DNR, and US Fish and Wildlife Service partnered with Maryland SHA to design a framework for identifying environmental stewardship opportunities for a proposed Transportation Improvement project near Waldorf, MD. • Green Infrastructure Network Design • The Conservation Fund served as the lead designer of an interconnected network of land and water resources that serve as a framework for evaluating and prioritizing conservation and restoration opportunities within the project area. • Integrating the Green and the Gray • The US 301 project serves as a model for integrating transportation and environmental planning used public involvement, the best available conservation science, and decision support tools. • Optimization Tool for Project Selection • The Conservation Fund and the University of Delaware developed an Excel-based decision support tool to select environmental stewardship projects that maximize benefits at a given budget level.

3. Stakeholder Priorities • Four focus group sessions • 64 individuals

4. US 301 Core Areas

5. Environmental Stewardship - Ecological Ranking

7. Project selection methods • Government agencies and NGOs typically use a rank-based approach to select projects for implementation. • The rank-based approach focuses only on the benefits of a project without considering the project’s cost, which can result in highly inefficient investments. • It ignores potential “good buys” that offer high quality (environmental benefits) at a significantly lower cost. • The use of optimization in project selection provides a means to extend the reach and effectiveness of environmental efforts. Courtesy of University of Delaware

8. Rank-Based Models Rank-order projects from highest benefit to lowest. Invest in highest ranked projects until the budget is expended. Guarantees selection of the highest rated projects. Optimal, only if all costs are equal. Optimization Models Seeks to maximize aggregate benefits. Subject to constraints (e.g. budget, project type, etc.) Model selects “Best Buys” by using optimization method (i.e. binary linear programming) or cost-effective analysis method Differences in selection models Courtesy of University of Delaware

9. Courtesy of University of Delaware

10. Project selection using optimization • Optimization Decision Support Tool requirements • Opportunities (Environmental stewardship projects) • Benefits (Project benefit scoring/ranking) • Costs (Financial investment required to achieve benefits) • Constraints (Budget scenario, other decision constraints) • Tool benefits • Easy to use (Excel interface) • Flexible (answer multiple planning questions) • Ability to run multiple scenarios (sensitivity analysis) • Potential to extend limited funds for compensatory mitigation and environmental stewardship

11. Optimization Tool Tool developed by the University of Delaware and The Conservation Fund

12. Optimization Example