1 / 9

UCSF Medical Center CTG – February 6, 2014

UCSF Medical Center. UCSF Medical Center CTG – February 6, 2014. Project: e-Form/e-Signature (Proof of Concept) BCD Project Manager: Sheryl Shah. The presenter(s):. Sheryl Shah, PMO Project Manager, Pamela Hudson, Executive Director. Irene Brezman , Director. The ask:.

Download Presentation

UCSF Medical Center CTG – February 6, 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UCSF Medical Center UCSF Medical CenterCTG – February 6, 2014 Project: e-Form/e-Signature (Proof of Concept) BCD Project Manager: Sheryl Shah

  2. The presenter(s): Sheryl Shah, PMO Project Manager, Pamela Hudson, Executive Director. Irene Brezman, Director The ask: Request CTG approval to move forward with a “technical proof of concept”to confirm maturity/functionality of e-Form/e-Signature vendor solution prior to developing a full business case. • Scope: • Proof of Concept • Create digital form with discreet data fields (patient demographics) with integration from APeX • Dual e-signature & workflow (Patient and Provider) of a surgical consent inside and outside of the organization • Integration of Consent Status in Apex so provider/staff easily know that the consent has been signed. • Prove of Concept Proposed Timeline: February to end of March 2014. • Proof of Concept Cost : $29,920 (to vendor) but will be credited back against license/subscription fee if we move forward with implementation • Proof of Concept Funding: CS operating budget

  3. Background: • Its been a journey . . . . . • Missing consent forms = delay patient care and waste (muda) : • Inappropriate/Over Processing • Unnecessary Motion • Wait Time • Solution must integrate with Apex and ImageNow (ECM). • Various vendor solutions reviewed, including: • BottomLine • EPIC • Docu-Sign/Kryptiq

  4. Recommended Vendor: Healthcare Workflow Integration Electronic Signature Platform • Benefits of the DocuSign for Patient include: • DSP is optimized for healthcare organizations by utilizing: • DocuSignplatform for: • Creation/Management of document templates • e-signature/authentication • Virtual distribution of e-form • Kryptic for workflow management and EMR integration : • Centricity, Allscripts, NextGen and Greenway • Device management at point-of-care (PC, Tablet) • Partnership Approach: • In recognition of opportunity to partner with UCSF to: • Integrate with APeX (Epic) and ImageNow • Extend workflow solution to Inpatient/Procedural areas • Kryptiq is offering UCSF a significant discount on an enterprise license

  5. Proof of Concept • Use Case: Surgical Consent Form • Develop e-Form with discreet patient demographic fields from APeX. • Validate Dual E-Signature workflow: Patient and Physician • Integration of Consent Form “status” into Apex to inform consent was signed • Storage of signed e-form in BLOB server and long-term into ImageNow • Impacted Application Resources (*Sunny Bang, Andrew Robinson, KhiangSeow) • Need Business Partners Participation for requirements/validation • Dr. Robinowitz, Others: Nursing, Prepare Clinic • Target Completion Date: March 31, 2014

  6. Product Costs: • DocuSign/Kryptiq has provided a reduced pricing quote • One-time Perpetual License of $149,601 (-20% from Proof of Concept) • Yearly maintenance fee of $29,920. • Includes: • Enterprise wide software license • Initial package of standard forms • Kryptiq development for integration points with ImageNow and Apex. • Client training on best practices for developing forms • No restriction on amount of forms that can be built • Further Costs: (Total Cost Ownership TBD - - pending successful completion of Proof of Concept) • Hardware: Server • Cost for installing DSP software onto Server • Tablets • Labor for UCSF staff

  7. Next Steps: • Based on successfully completing a “technical” proof of concept • Determine future roadmap for e-Form/e-Signature initiative • Based on ImageNow (ECM) project research, UCSF has approximately 2000 forms. • Identify business representatives to participate in planning efforts • Prioritization of impacted areas: ROI, High Risk Areas • Focus on specific use cases: Operational workflows to guide technical development needs • Determine opportunities to lean processes and drive to standardization • Determine full cost estimates for further development and implementation • Present back to CTG in May or June

  8. Appendix

More Related