1 / 38

“Non-commercial” TB tests Brief overview from MSF perspective

“Non-commercial” TB tests Brief overview from MSF perspective. Francis Varaine, MSF Retooling Task Force Geneva, 15-16/01/08. Content. Microscopy Bleach concentration Auramine staining FDA staining 2 slides Positivity threshold Culture and DST MODS Thin-layer agar Nitrate reductase

lamont
Download Presentation

“Non-commercial” TB tests Brief overview from MSF perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. “Non-commercial” TB testsBrief overview from MSF perspective Francis Varaine, MSF Retooling Task Force Geneva, 15-16/01/08

  2. Content Microscopy • Bleach concentration • Auramine staining • FDA staining • 2 slides • Positivity threshold Culture and DST • MODS • Thin-layer agar • Nitrate reductase • Redox indicators • Kudoh method • Slide culture • …..

  3. Microscopy

  4. Bleach concentration method • Centrifugation or sedimentation increases the sensitivity of the sputum smear microscopy. • Angeby et al., IJTLD 2004 (literature review) • Recommend the evaluation and introduction of the bleach method in most settings where mycobacterial culture is not performed routinely. • Steingart et al., Lancet Infect Dis. 2006 (a systematic review) • Centrifugation with any of several chemical methods (including bleach) is more sensitive, that overnight sedimentation preceded • There were insufficient data to determine the value of sputum processing methods in patients with HIV infection. • Bonnet et al (MSF), CID 2008. • Bleach sedimentation: An opportunity to optimize tuberculosis smear microscopy in high HIV prevalence settings. Adopted, introduced and implemented

  5. Auramine staining • Steingart et al., Lancet Infect Dis. 2006 : Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review. • Fluorescence microscopy is more sensitive than conventional microscopy, and has similar specificity. • There is sufficient evidence to determine the value of fluorescence microscopy in HIV-infected individuals • LED • Study in Kenya : bleach + auramine Adopted, introduced and implemented

  6. FDA staining • FDA (fluorescein) staining can be distinguish between live and dead AFB • For diagnosis of true treatment failure. • A. Hamid Salim, et al., Int J Tuber Lung Dis 2006. Early and rapid microcopy-based diagnosis of true treatment failure and MDR-TB. • In Bangladesh: • Compared FDA staining and culture on smear positive sputum. • -Sensitivity 99% • -Specificity 82%   • -Accuracy 93%                                                                        Operational research

  7. New definitions • 2 slides • Positivity threshold : • 1 positive / 2 slides • 1 AFB / 100 fields Bonnet, et al : Reducing the number of sputum samples examined and thresholds for positivity: an opportunity to optimise smear microscopy. IJTLD (2007) Adopted, introduced and implemented

  8. Rapid culture and DST • Microcolonies • Colorimetric methods

  9. MODS Microscopic observation drug susceptibility Based on characteristic cord formation in early liquid cultures • Caviedes et al. JCM 2000; Moore et al. JCM 2004,NEJM2006 • MTB detection rapid (median 7 days, 13 days BACTEC, 26 days LJ) • Sensitive (98% vs 84%) • RIF: sensitivity 100%; specificity 100% • INH: sensitivity 84,6%; specificity 99.6% Caviedes et al. J. Clin Microbiol 2000 Not adopted

  10. MODS procedure manual http://www.ucph.edu.pe

  11. TLA Thin Layer Agar • Based on detection of microcolonies on 7H10 agar • Characteristic “cording” • • Robledo et al., IJTLD 2006 (multicenter study) • Da Silva et. al., Braz. J. of Microbiology 2007 • • Direct method for smear positive and negative specimens • • Median time to detection 10 days, for RIF and INH resistance • • Good sensitivity and specificity for direct DST (Robledo et al., submitted) Picture: J. Robledo Adopted for field testing

  12. TLA multicentric study Total of 1118 specimens studied in six sites Evaluation of a rapid culture method for tuberculosis diagnosis: a Latin American multi-center study. J. A. Robledo,G. I. Mejía, N. Morcillo,L. Chacón M. Camacho,J. Luna, J. Zurita, A. Bodon, M. Velasco, J. C. Palomino, A. Martin, F. Portaels. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung. Dis.10(6):613–619, 2006

  13. 7H11 + PNB 7H11 Reading with standard microscope Identification M. tuberculosis TLA for diagnosis Decontamination sputum sample NALC/NaOH

  14. Identification M. tuberculosis 7H11 agar growth control 7H11 agar +PNB 500 37°C 5%C02 7H11 agar + INH 0.2 7H11 agar + RIF 1 Reading with standard microscope Detection resistance INH Detection resistance RIF Direct DST TLA INH/RIF Decontamination sputum sample + ofloxacine under validation

  15. Implementation of TLA in Homa Bay, Kenya (MSF)

  16. TB culture lab.

  17. Reading under normal microscope (objective 10x), twice a week

  18. TLA procedure manual http://www.itg.be

  19. Rapid culture and DST • Microcolonies • Colorimetric methods

  20. Nitrate Reductase Assay (Griess method) NRA (indirect) • Ängeby et al., JCM 2002, • Martin et al., JMM 2005 (multicentric study first-line drugs), • Martin et al., JCM, 2005 (ofloxacin) • INH, RIF, EMB, SM, OFLO • High accuracy (95-100%) for INH, RIF and OFLO • Median TAT: 10 days NRA (direct) on sputum smear + samples • Musa et al. J Clin Microbiol 2005 • Solis et al. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005 • Affolabi et al. J Clin Microbiol 2007 • Median TAT: 14-28 days Considered for field testing

  21. Nitrate Reductase Assay (Griess method) Nitrate Nitrite

  22. Implementation of the NRA direct in Cotonou • Affolabi et al, JCM 2007 • Performed on solid media • Rapid method for DST • Easy to implement in resource-limited countries • No need for training if implemented in lab where DST is already performed on LJ. • No need of special equipment • Sensitivity 88%, specificity 100% • TAT: 18 days (direct)

  23. Picture: Dr Affolabi, Benin

  24. Colorimetric redox indicators • Based on reduction of indicators by mycobacterial metabolism • Alamar Blue (Yaiko et. al JCM 1995) • Resazurin (Palomino, AAC 2002) • Martin et al. 2007 meta-analysis • 18 studies for RIF • 16 studies for INH • Evidence of high sensitivity and specificity • Other studies: EMB, SM, KAN, ETH, CAP, OFLO MIC Picture: A. Martin

  25. Implementation of the resazurin in CotonouAffolabi et al., 2007 (submitted) • Studied 151 strains of TB • Performed REMA and compared results with the gold standard PM on LJ for RIF and INH • TAT REMA : 3 weeks + 8 days • Conventional method : 3 weeks + 4-6 weeks. • Results • for RIF: 94% sensitivity and 100% specificity • for INH: 100 % sensitivity and 100% specificity

  26. NRA procedure manual http://www.itg.be

  27. Colorimetric assay procedure manual http://www.itg.be

  28. Simplified culture

  29. . 4% NaOH Kudoh culture – Swab method • Kudoh and Kudoh. Bull. World Health Org. 1974;51:71-82 : a simplified swab method for culturing mycobacteria that takes only 3-4 minutes per sample, and needs neither technical skill, centrifugation, nor a biosafety cabinet. • Sputum is smeared onto a swab stick that is immersed into a test tube with sterile 4% sodium hydroxide. • Very simple method to culture Mycobacteria in rural areas • In 2006: evaluation of this method in Venezuela (Jacobus DeWaard, unpublish data) • Kudoh swab method is as sensitive as the Petroff decontamination procedure in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB. Medium Ogawa pH 6,4

  30. Implementation of Kudoh culture in Venezuela,Warao Amerindian populationJacobus De Waard et al. (not yet published) • Evaluation of the Kudoh method in two hospital laboratories in Caracas, Venezuela and in the Warao Amerindian population (Orinoco River delta). • All samples were processed for acid-fast staining and cultured using both the Petroff and Kudoh methods. Picture: Jacobus De Waard, Venezuela

  31. Results: Kudoh culture Jacobus De Waard et al. (unpublished) • Kudoh swab method is as sensitive as the Petroff decontamination procedure in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB. • It represents an alternative method for culturing mycobacteria that could reduce labor in laboratories with a high volume of sputum samples, especially appropriate for rural settings without the proper infrastructure for traditional culturing. • The method needs no laboratory equipment, and the minimal sample manipulation reduces biosecurity risks, so that it can be easily taught to technicians without experience in tuberculosis microbiology. Considered for operational research

  32. Slide DST

  33. Slide DST • Culture perform directly on slide smear-positive samples • Counting acid-fast micro-colonies under microscope • A. Hamid Salim et al., Int J Tuber Lung Dis 2006. Early and rapid microcopy-based diagnosis of true treatment failure and MDR-TB. • Sensitivity and specificity RIF:96% • Sensitivity and specificity INH: 99% and 64% Picture: A. van Deun Considered for operational research

  34. Early and rapid microcopy-based diagnosis of true treatment failure and MDR-TB, 2006, Int J Tuber Lung Dis 10 (11):1248-1254. A. Hamid Salim, et al

  35. Summary Implemented Implemented Operational research Implemented Implemented Microscopy • Bleach concentration • Auramine staining • FDA staining • 2 slides • Positivity threshold Culture and DST • MODS • Thin-layer agar • Nitrate reductase • Redox indicators • Kudoh method • Slide culture Not adopted Adopted for field test Considered for field test Not adopted Considered for operational research Considered for operational research

  36. Conclusion • Some tools exist • Some ready for implementation • Some require more field testing • Some require more evidence • Why so slow ? • Why so neglected ?

More Related