1 / 16

Forest Fertilization: Two Topics

Forest Fertilization: Two Topics. Roderick Negrave PhD, RPF, PAg Research Section Head, Coast Area MNRO, Nanaimo. You Will Hear About:. Spring versus fall applications of urea Nitrogen alone compared to N plus P fertilizer applications in western redcedar. Timing of Urea Application.

lamis
Download Presentation

Forest Fertilization: Two Topics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Forest Fertilization: Two Topics Roderick Negrave PhD, RPF, PAg Research Section Head, Coast Area MNRO, Nanaimo

  2. You Will Hear About: • Spring versus fall applications of urea • Nitrogen alone compared to N plus P fertilizer applications in western redcedar

  3. Timing of Urea Application What is the issue? • Volatilization and leaching losses of N • Reduced recover of N by crop trees • Less efficient use of fertilizer product by the crop • Increased possibility of environmental contamination

  4. Urea in the Soil • Plants cannot absorb urea directly • Urea decomposes to ammonium and then nitrate under appropriate conditions • Unfavourable condition will promote volatilization of N-based gasses (leaching) • Fertilizer-N best applied during periods of rapid fine root growth (spring and fall)

  5. General Findings • Studies have been conducted on pines and Douglas-fir on the BC Coast, Interior, US Northwest and Scandinavia • Season of urea application has not been studied for western hemlock nor for western redcedar • Studies of Coastal Douglas-fir response are likely most useful for our discussion

  6. Applicable Findings • Differences in urea-N uptake were found between spring and fall applications • Fall applications of urea resulted in greater foliar N concentrations • Foliar concentrations were examined but not growth • Less conclusive results in BC Interior

  7. Why? • Warmer and drier spring weather conditions promote volatilization of N • Cooler and moister fall weather conditions may promote leaching of N as nitrate • However, tree roots are present in sufficient volume to assimilate nitrate before is washes from sites

  8. We Can Conclude... • Nitrogen assimilation by stands is likely greater with fall urea applications on the Coast • This difference may decrease as sites become more continental • Effects of seasonal application on growth are uncertain

  9. Western Redcedar: N Versus N+P Fertilizer Applications • Hw responds well to N+P: What about Cw? • Phosphorus is a pivotal plant nutrient and constituent of cell contents and meristems • Broadly, P found at about 20% of N concentrations • Long-term fertilizer responses (>50 yrs) associated with P applications

  10. Sources of Information • Weetman et al (2 x 1989): • One-year of small plot data plus screening trials • Seven-year old plantation on CH site • Harrington and Devine (2009, 2011): • Thinning and fertilization of a low-site Cw stand on the Olympic Peninsula • Fertilizer applied at 1 and 13 years • Complicated my K, S and Ca application in first fertilization • Followed to 25 years

  11. Weetman et al.One-Year Height Growth (cm) N0P0 33 (24) N100P0 39 (20) N100P100 42 (18) N200P0 45 (21) N200P100 50 (20) N300P0 43 (19) N300P100 53 (19)

  12. Weetman et al. (cont.) • One-year trial suggests Cw response to P likely varies with N application • Three-year plot and single-tree screening trials confirmed that Cw does respond to N+P additions • Significance of difference between N vs. N+P not confirmed but suggested

  13. Harrington and Devine • Volume (Thinned): N: 266.9 (22.7)a N+P: 283.9 (11.5)a • Basal Area (Thinned): N: 41.8 (2.9)a N+P: 44.3 (1.9)a

  14. Devine and Harrington • BA PAI (13 – 25 years, thinned): N+P > N • Height PAI (13 – 25 years, thinned): N+P >N

  15. Considerations • Cost of fertilizer-P product • Cost of additional turns to deliver added product i.e. 300 kg/h of N versus 300 kg N plus 100 kg/ha of P • Value of added increment: Marginal return complicated by time and N x P interaction

  16. Conclusion • There is added growth in N+P compared to N-only applications • This difference may accelerate over time • Whether additional growth will pay for additional P is likely fairly complex due to complexity of P response with time

More Related