90 likes | 189 Views
Explore the significance of leadership issues when expanding or making changes, with insights on failures, lessons, styles, and sources of leaders in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. Understand what leaders value, the MD process to grow leaders, and remuneration issues. Discover the differences and similarities in leadership across the Baltics.
E N D
Practice:Leadership and Management Development in the Baltics
Why leadership issue is important? • Whenever expanding or planning a change – the leader issue is of key importance to all companies operating crossboarder • Failures to run subsidiaries abroad • 20% inadequate financing • 80% failure to reach and attract leaders • Lessons from expansion x-Baltic • Involve and adjust to new leaders • communicate vision
Leadership style perception • Decision making (authocratic/consultative) • Teamwork/individualistic orientation • Attitude to change (early adoption/ aggressive confrontation/ scepticism) • Communication habits (formal/informal) • Openness
Availability of leaders • Lithuania • Adequate supply for SME • For sizeable enterprizes – lack of managerially competent leaders in specialized fields (e.g. IT, etc) • Latvia • For SME – turnover of good leaders • For sizeable enterprizes the issue is at the mid-level management • Estonia • Adequate supply for SME • Lack of leaders for sizeabale enterprizes
Source of leaders • Lithuania • Internal development (change averseness, loyalty to organisation) • Multinationals is a source for other multinationals mostly • Latvia • Internal development • Headhunting among companies (average stay rather short) • Other companies (loyalty to profession, not organisation) • Estonia • Multinationals rotation • Sizeable state institutions & businesses
What Leaders Value • Lithuania • Stability and long term commitment • New challenges and variety • Proximity to political elite (large institutions and companies) • Latvia • Varying: e.g. Stability for state institution leaders, however challenges, money, etc. in the private sector • Personal development and achievement • Status and power • Estonia • The leaders expectation is first of all one’s own growth • Reasonable and trustworthy “stakeholders environment” • Technocratic/market rather than organisational goals prevail
MD Process to grow leaders • Lithuania • Integrated MD process is very rare in local companies • Interest in MD is growing • Succession planning quite rare so far, individual initiative • Latvia • Quite a few companies (mostly international) have an advanced MD process • Interest in MD is also significant and many companies started implementation efforts • Estonia • 3-5 local companies have the integrated MD process • MD Philosophy adopted in 10% of organisations • Few Leaders are coaching successors by personal initiative
Remuneration issues • Lithuania • The opportunity to build own image overweighs money • In state companies amounts limited by governmental level • Latvia • Highest remuneration in absolute terms in the Baltics • Large regional differences • Different types of remuneration including stock options, etc. • Estonia • Salary and annual bonus • Almost non-existent 2+ years related option and bonus schemes • The opportunity to build own image overweights money
Conclusion • There are differences • However, more similarities