1 / 25

Avi Bardack - avi@umd Antoni Gmurczyk - agmur@umd Steven O’Brien - ebisumaru@gmail

Avi Bardack - avi@umd.edu Antoni Gmurczyk - agmur@umd.edu Steven O’Brien - ebisumaru@gmail.com Ryan Oaks - roaks@umd.edu. December 7, 2009. Problem. Current restaurant review sites are not directed well toward College Park students Limited info about specific food items

laith-welch
Download Presentation

Avi Bardack - avi@umd Antoni Gmurczyk - agmur@umd Steven O’Brien - ebisumaru@gmail

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Avi Bardack - avi@umd.edu Antoni Gmurczyk - agmur@umd.edu Steven O’Brien - ebisumaru@gmail.com Ryan Oaks - roaks@umd.edu December 7, 2009

  2. Problem • Current restaurant review sites are not directed well toward College Park students • Limited info about specific food items • Difficult for college students to find restaurants based on their needs

  3. Solutions • Add menu for each restaurant, with reviews and ratings for individual food items • Add searching mechanisms directed toward the needs of college students

  4. Other Design • Did not have search box • Used directory style for every search type • Criteria • Restaurant type • No user login

  5. Usability Test Method

  6. Pre-Test Form • General questions • Age • Gender • UMCP Student? • Residency • Transportation methods • Internet access • Dining experience • How often go out for food? • How often go out to bars? • How often order delivery? • What's most important when buying food?

  7. Usability Test • Subjects • 8 UMCP College Students • Tasks • Freshman Scenario • Sushi-Lover Scenario • Hungry Pizza-Lover Scenario • Save Your Favorite Restaurant Scenario • Partying At The Bar Scenario • Lonely Scenario • Goal: Make use of the full functionality of the prototype • Different search options • Compare restaurants (based on different attributes) • Locate the restaurant • Compare food items • Write reviews, etc.

  8. HiFi Prototype

  9. Usability Test Results

  10. Results LIKE • Concentrated on restaurants around the area • Able to compare different attributes of the restaurants • Idea of searching for food items • Searching from restaurant page • On the right track DISLIKE • Search bar options confusing • Cannot sort the results by all available critria • Not all ratings in reviews apply to all places • Main concerns: non-dynamic and lack of visual appeal

  11. Demo • Demo.

  12. The Future • Infrastructure • Data • Page-specific • Features

  13. Infrastructure • Page refresh always required • MS Visual C# • Rewrite code base

  14. Data • Source • Restaurant Owners • Users

  15. Restaurant Results • Hours

  16. Food Results • Food Link • Horizontal Scanning

  17. Whitespace

  18. Whitespace

  19. Things We Didn’t Account For • Food reviews need a LOT of data • Different food sizes • Autonomous ratings • Searching by service/atmosphere • Food types

  20. Questions? • No?

  21. Good • Thank you, come again

More Related