html5-img
1 / 83

Presented at Modeling Subcommittee July 18, 2006

Preliminary Assessment of Sediment Observations from the Shallow Stations and the Mid-Channel Stations. Presented at Modeling Subcommittee July 18, 2006. What is the relationship between the shallow water turbidity observations and related observations from adjacent channel stations?

lainey
Download Presentation

Presented at Modeling Subcommittee July 18, 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Preliminary Assessment of Sediment Observations from the Shallow Stations and the Mid-Channel Stations Presented at Modeling Subcommittee July 18, 2006

  2. What is the relationship between the shallow water turbidity observations and related observations from adjacent channel stations? • - Does one reflect the other in any way? With what consistency? Can one predict one with the other? • - What is the relationship between turbidity and TSS? • - Do the Data Flow cruises go out to the channel stations and if so, what does that tell us about the relationship of the shallow and channel monitoring? If Data Flow doesn't go to the channel stations, should it? • Does it ever cross from one side of a broad river, e.g., the Potomac, to the other and what can that tell us about the shallow/channel differences? • Can one shallow water monitoring station's continuous turbidity observations as well as other observations be related to adjacent sites, or are they entirely independent? • Are the shallow water monitoring stations effected by high TSS loads from the fall line? • - With what frequency does this happen? • - How far down estuary does the fall line influence go? To the oligohaline? To the lower estuary? • - What is the frequency of fall line effects for different stations in the Tidal Fresh Potomac for example? • Can we relate wind speed and direction to turbidity? • - If a stiff wind is blowing in a Chesapeake tributary do we consistently see high turbidity on the leeward shore? • - Does this effect all stations on the leeward shore? • - Do the windward shore shallow water monitoring sites have relatively less suspended sediment under the same conditions?

  3. Review of Previous Work -- by MDDNR (Karrh; ) • 127 shallow, 54 midChannel (13 tribs) • Secchi depth, DIN, Chl-a. • Statistics: Wilcoxon paired-sample; relation plots. • ~2 km distance for midChannel to characterize nearshore conditions.

  4. Mid Channel Stations: TSS (biweekly). • Shallow stations: Turb (15 minutes interval). • Precipitation, Wind speed, fall-line flow.

  5. TF1.0 WXT0013 – Iron Pot XFB2184 - Piscataway PXT0455 – Jug Bay TF2.1 MTI0015:- Mataponi XEA3687 – M’woman RET1.1 XDE4587 - Pin Oak RET2.2 RET2.4 XBF6843:- SagePoint XBE8396:- PineyPoint XBF0231:- Fenwick PAT0311 – King’s Landing XED0694 - Benedict XCF9029 – CBL

  6. TF1.0 WXT0013 – Iron Pot XFB2184 - Piscataway PXT0455 – Jug Bay TF2.1 MTI0015:- Mataponi XEA3687 – M’woman RET1.1 XDE4587 - Pin Oak RET2.2 RET2.4 XBF6843:- SagePoint XBE8396:- PineyPoint XBF0231:- Fenwick PAT0311 – King’s Landing XED0694 - Benedict XCF9029 – CBL

  7. Iorn Point

  8. TF1.0 WXT0013 – Iron Pot XFB2184 - Piscataway PXT0455 – Jug Bay TF2.1 MTI0015:- Mataponi XEA3687 – M’woman RET1.1 XDE4587 - Pin Oak RET2.2 RET2.4 XBF6843:- SagePoint XBE8396:- PineyPoint XBF0231:- Fenwick PAT0311 – King’s Landing XED0694 - Benedict XCF9029 – CBL

  9. Jug Bay

  10. TF1.0 WXT0013 – Iron Pot XFB2184 - Piscataway PXT0455 – Jug Bay TF2.1 MTI0015:- Mataponi XEA3687 – M’woman RET1.1 XDE4587 - Pin Oak RET2.2 RET2.4 XBF6843:- SagePoint XBE8396:- PineyPoint XBF0231:- Fenwick PAT0311 – King’s Landing XED0694 - Benedict XCF9029 – CBL

  11. Mataponi

  12. TF1.0 WXT0013 – Iron Pot XFB2184 - Piscataway PXT0455 – Jug Bay TF2.1 MTI0015:- Mataponi XEA3687 – M’woman RET1.1 XDE4587 - Pin Oak RET2.2 RET2.4 XBF6843:- SagePoint XBE8396:- PineyPoint XBF0231:- Fenwick PAT0311 – King’s Landing XED0694 - Benedict XCF9029 – CBL

  13. Pin Oak

  14. TF1.0 WXT0013 – Iron Pot XFB2184 - Piscataway PXT0455 – Jug Bay TF2.1 MTI0015:- Mataponi XEA3687 – M’woman RET1.1 XDE4587 - Pin Oak RET2.2 RET2.4 XBF6843:- SagePoint XBE8396:- PineyPoint XBF0231:- Fenwick PAT0311 – King’s Landing XED0694 - Benedict XCF9029 – CBL

  15. TF1.0 WXT0013 – Iron Pot XFB2184 - Piscataway PXT0455 – Jug Bay TF2.1 MTI0015:- Mataponi XEA3687 – M’woman RET1.1 XDE4587 - Pin Oak RET2.2 RET2.4 XBF6843:- SagePoint XBE8396:- PineyPoint XBF0231:- Fenwick PAT0311 – King’s Landing XED0694 - Benedict XCF9029 – CBL

  16. Iorn Point

  17. Jug Bay

  18. Mataponi

  19. Pin Oak

  20. Iorn Point

  21. Jug Bay

  22. Mataponi

More Related