1 / 12

Measuring ISP Toplogies with Rocketfuel Neil Spring, Ratul Mahajan, and David Wetherall

Measuring ISP Toplogies with Rocketfuel Neil Spring, Ratul Mahajan, and David Wetherall. Presented By: David Deschenes March 25, 2003. Contributions. Presents novel techniques for generating high quality ISP maps while using as few network measurements as possible

kynan
Download Presentation

Measuring ISP Toplogies with Rocketfuel Neil Spring, Ratul Mahajan, and David Wetherall

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Measuring ISP Toplogieswith RocketfuelNeil Spring, Ratul Mahajan, and David Wetherall Presented By: David Deschenes March 25, 2003

  2. Contributions • Presents novel techniques for generating high quality ISP maps while using as few network measurements as possible • Examines several properties of generated maps that are likely to be of use in creating synthetic Internet maps

  3. Motivation • Brute-force approaches to Internet mapping produce excessive loads and can take extraordinary amounts of time • Synthetic Internet maps of high quality are useful to researchers, especially with respect to the execution of realistic simulations

  4. Terminology • An ISP network consists of multiple POPs • Each POP is a collection of routers • POPs are connected by backbone links • Backbone routers are attached to backbone links • Access routers intermediate between the ISP backbone and routers on neighboring networks

  5. Approach • Omit measurements likely to be redundant • Expected BGP routing paths facilitate selection • Trades accuracy for efficiency • Improve alias resolution • Make use of IP identifier, rate-limiting and TTL values • Annotate maps • Hints about geographical location and role may be extracted from DNS names

  6. Directed Probing • Selects traceroute measurements that will transit the ISP in question • Measurement Types • Dependent Prefix • Insider • Up/Down Sample BGP Routing Table

  7. Path Reductions Ingress Egress Next-hop AS

  8. Alias Resolution • Send a series of probe packets to potential matches, and test the following data • Packet TTLs • ICMP Rate-limiting • IP Identifiers • The use of IP Identifiers proved most valuable, while the other data provided greater levels of confidence in IP Identifier matches

  9. Rocketfuel BGP Table Egress Discovery Tasklist Generation Alias Resolution Execution Path Reductions ISP Map

  10. Impact of Reductions • Direct probing reduced number of traces to 1-8% depending on the ISP to be mapped • Ingress reduction kept only 12% of those traces selected by direct probing • Egress reduction kept only 18% of those traces selected by direct probing • Next-hop AS reduction kept only 5% of those selected by direct probing • Overall, after reductions, less than 0.1% of the traces required by a brute-force technique were executed by Rocketfuel

  11. Accuracy of Generated Maps • Found from 64% to 96% of backbone routers depending on the ISP to be mapped (See Table 2) • BGP adjacencies somewhat consistent with those provided by RouteViews (See Figure 9) • Significant disparity between Rocketfuel and Skitter with regard to adjacencies (See Figure 10)

  12. Questions?

More Related