1 / 5

Large-scale projects to enhance development

Large-scale projects to enhance development. 1. Dams. positive effects:. - meets demand for electricity for industries and housholds. - no CO 2 emissions. - more irrigation. more food production. - prevention of flooding. - water reservoir for cities. - more jobs in rural areas.

kylee
Download Presentation

Large-scale projects to enhance development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Large-scale projects to enhance development 1. Dams positive effects: - meets demand for electricity for industries and housholds - no CO2 emissions - more irrigation more food production - prevention of flooding - water reservoir for cities - more jobs in rural areas negative effects: - people are forced to leave their land and homes - loss of farmland - flooding of historic sites - loss of natural habitats and species - restricted migration of fish -change of microclimate

  2. 2. Exploitation of resources (Stiglitz: "The resource curse") • natural resources (oil, diamonds, gold and other metals) problems: - MNCs pollute the land and don't pay for the damage - destruction of other jobs, e.g. dangerous run-offs destroy fishing waters - most of the profit goes to MNCs • agricultural products Immanent problem with all big projects: corruption e.g. – tropical wood – roses from Africa – palm oil – Victoria perch problems: – indigenous people lose their livelihood (forced displacement/loss of land/biodiversity) poverty and hunger – less arable land for food production imports? – dependence on foreign investors and capital – dependence on only one crop – dangers of monocultures: • decreasing yields • heavy use of pesticides • contamination of ground water – loss of rain forests: negative impact on world climate – erosion of soils

  3. possible advantages: - growth of GDP  problem: uneven distribution of new wealth (disparities remain) - higher tax revenues: can be used for improved education and health care facilities etc. - more jobs in the manufacturing sector and on plantations/fishing sites etc.

  4. How can the "resource curse" be fought? - state-owned companies (possibly as joint ventures) can keep the wealth in the country  successful cases: - Malaysia (oil) - Chile (copper), with stabilization fund - Russia Putin era - Norway (oil), with stabilization fund - Botswana (diamonds), with stabilization fund - stabilization funds: help to stabilize the economy in case of price slumps (volatility of prices of natural resources) - setting up of independent institutions to fight corruption - exploiting resources must result in good investments for the future otherwise: once the resources are gone, the country will be poorer (not sustainable) instrument: accounting framework with depreciation of assets (resources)  Green Net National Product (Green NNP) destructive IMF accounting: "countries get good marks if they reduce their deficits by cutting down forests etc. at a fraction of the full value"  also: IMF only accounts debts without regarding investments

  5. - "Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative":  no tax deduction for payments to foreign governments without disclosure of what was paid and how much the resource was extracted - reduction of arms sales - certification:  diamonds: no uncertified "conflict diamonds" (certificate of origin from the government)  tropical wood - limiting of financial assistance to countries that sell their resources below value (why should taxpayers here pay for such bad management?) - setting norms: some international body (e.g. World Bank) could check/survey contracts of MNCs with DCs to make sure DCs get better value for their resources - MNCs must guarantee for any environmental damage they cause - effective enforcement of all these measures

More Related