1 / 5

“SMEs and FP7”

“SMEs and FP7”. Statement to the EPP Hearing on FP7 22nd September 2005 by Prof. Dr. Theo Gumpelmayer Vice-President, EARTO – European Association of Research and Technology Organisations President, ACR – Austrian Cooperative Research. “SMEs and FP7”.

ksena
Download Presentation

“SMEs and FP7”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. “SMEs and FP7” Statement to the EPP Hearing on FP7 22nd September 2005 by Prof. Dr. Theo Gumpelmayer Vice-President, EARTO – European Association of Research and Technology Organisations President, ACR – Austrian Cooperative Research

  2. “SMEs and FP7” Seven European trade associations representing over half a million SMEs from many sectors of the European economy have made practical proposals for a better Framework Programme.

  3. “SMEs and FP7”

  4. “SMEs and FP7” Three key arguments We have to get European SMEs investing much more in R&D. Europe has too few SMEs that build successful continental and global businesses A better-balanced Framework Programme is needed that does much more to stimulate knowledge and business growth amongst the much larger community of medium-tech SMEs

  5. “SMEs and FP7” The key conclusion and recommendation: FP7 should target three principal communities of SME, with a budget of at least €1 billion each: Medium-tech SMEs with European and global growth potential - and needing R&D support in order to be able to innovate successfully - using an instrument like CRAFT Medium- and low-tech SMEs facing growing international competition and increasing European regulatory burdens, using an instrument like Collective Research, and Hi-tech SMEs with longer-term European and global growth potential, using an instrument like STREPs - but, unlike the current STREPs in the Priority Thematic Areas, operated in a bottom-up manner because these SMEs’ need shorter-term research identified from market needs.

More Related