1 / 36

Creating a Window of Opportunity for Policy Change

Creating a Window of Opportunity for Policy Change. By Nancy Yinger, The Population Reference Bureau AMDD Conference Kuala Lumpur, 2003. Workshop Objectives. Goal: To provide overview of the role of information in policy process.   Topics:  The research-to-policy gap

kosey
Download Presentation

Creating a Window of Opportunity for Policy Change

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Creating a Window of Opportunity for Policy Change By Nancy Yinger, The Population Reference Bureau AMDD Conference Kuala Lumpur, 2003

  2. Workshop Objectives • Goal: To provide overview of the role of information in policy process.   • Topics: •  The research-to-policy gap • A model of the policy process •  Policy-relevant findings, implications, and recommendations • The importance of evaluation

  3. The Research-to-Policy Gap • Large investments have been made in policy-relevant data collection and research. • Yet, opportunities for increasing knowledge and putting data to use are often lost. • Researchers and decision makers work in different spheres.

  4. How is the gap manifested? • Stereotypes • Assumptions about how decisions are made

  5. Researchers' Stereotypes of Policymakers • Uninterested or too busy to read • Reach hasty conclusions • Actions unsubstantiated by data • Distrust survey and research findings • Limited perspective • Should be responsible for drawing implications from the data

  6. Policymakers’ Stereotypes of Researchers • Avoid policy implications of findings • Prone to professional "faddism" • Excessive use of technical jargon • Inconclusive generalities about broad theoretical matters • Little appreciation of real problems and data needs

  7. Assumptions about Decision-making Researchers may assume that policymakers: • Practice rational decision-making • Prioritize goals and objectives • Examine alternative solutions systematically • Choose alternatives that maximize goals

  8. Policymaking is Not Linear POLITICS PROBLEMS SOLUTIONS

  9. POLITICS SOLUTIONS PROBLEMS A Window of Opportunity for Policy Change Window of opportunity

  10. Moving the Spheres Together Policy Learning Coalition Building POLITICS PROBLEMS SOLUTIONS Agenda Setting

  11. The Goal of Agenda Setting Help issues gain and keep the attention of: • The media • The public • Policymakers

  12. Characteristics of Issues that Get on the Policy Agenda • Clear, measurable indicators • Policy champions • Feasible policy or program alternatives • Attention-focusing events

  13. Agenda Setting Activities • Press conferences and other kinds of support for journalists • Public events, seminars and speeches • One-on-one meetings with policymakers

  14. Coalition Building Links together individuals from • Government • The academic community • The media • NGOs and advocacy groups • Businesses

  15. Coalition Building Activities • Create and/or facilitate media or advocacy networks • Provide information to existing networks

  16. Policy Learning • The ongoing stream of information to policymakers • An understanding by all actors of complex power relations and changing institutional arrangements

  17. Policy Learning Activities • Policy analyses • Publications • Electronic communications (websites, CD-roms, e-newsletters) • Seminars and briefings

  18. Crafting the Policy Message Policy communication messages • derive directly from the data • help decision makers to understand policy implications and to make grounded policy recommendations.

  19. Implications Policy Environment Other Research Research to Recommendations Research Key Findings Recommendations

  20. Implications are: • Broad statements that express a direction, new information, or a need implied by the findings. • Analyses derived from two or more findings. • Guides to help the audience begin to interpret the findings.

  21. Making the Link to Recommendations Implications are a bridge from your key findings to policy recommendations.

  22. Recommendations: • Offer specific actions that you urge a policymaker or program planner to take. • Should start with an action & be S.M.A.R.T.

  23. A S.M.A.R.T. Recommendation Is: • Specific • Measurable • Action-oriented • Realistic • Timebound

  24. Skilled Attendance at Delivery, by Residence, India 1998-99 Percent of live births Source: OCR Macro, India National Family Health Survey, Demographic and Health Surveys.

  25. Implications • Rural women may be at significantly higher risk of maternal death than urban women because of the low level of skill attendance at birth. • A higher percentage of the urban women who have skilled care rely on doctors, which may result in higher medical costs.

  26. Recommendations • Within one year, conduct a behavior change campaign in rural areas to increase awareness of the importance of skilled care, and in urban areas to build support for using nurse/midwives. • Within two years, expand the number of trained nurse/midwives by 50%, and include a community service requirement to increase the pool of skilled providers in rural areas.

  27. Place of Delivery, by Education, Peru 2000 Percent of live births Source: OCR Peru Demographic and Health Survey.

  28. Implication • Educational level is clearly related to whether women in Peru deliver their babies at home or in facilities, but only the most educated women rely on facilities. Since women with primary education are quite similar to those with no education, programs need to target both groups to address their needs for safe delivery.

  29. Recommendations • Within 6 months, conduct additional analysis on the constraints to facility-based delivery faced by the 2 lower-education groups. • Within 1 year, start a community-based project to address those constraints, including materials for low-literate or illiterate populations about the danger signs of obstetric emergencies.

  30. Evaluating Policy Communications Have policy communications activities : • Helped your issues gain the attention of policy makers; • Enhanced coalition efforts to increase the saliency of your issues; or • Supported policy learning?

  31. And Ultimately…The Window of Opportunity Is there evidence of change in • Policies, • Programs, • Strategies, or • Resource allocation?

  32. Need for Benchmarks Policy Learning Coalition building “best” “worst” Agenda Setting

  33. Initial Assessment Policy Learning Coalition building Agenda Setting

  34. Post-Intervention Assessment Coalition Building: No change Policy Learning: Improved Window open Agenda Setting: Improved

  35. In Summary • Policy change is a complex, dynamic process. • Research can play a key role but the research-to-policy gap must be bridged. • Agenda-setting, coalition building & policy learning are key elements in policy change. • Effective policy communication depends on clear findings, implications & recommendations.

  36. Saving Women’s Lives Communicating your research findings to policymakers will help open the Window of Opportunity for improved maternal health policies. Thank you!

More Related