100 likes | 204 Views
Next Steps for the Matrix Drilling Category vs. Data Type Requirements interface Meeting the needs of proponents and panels IODP Site Survey Panel Meeting Stephen Miller Scripps Institution of Oceanography September 12, 2005. Who needs a Matrix? Proponents
E N D
Next Steps for the Matrix Drilling Category vs. Data Type Requirements interface Meeting the needs of proponents and panels IODP Site Survey Panel Meeting Stephen Miller Scripps Institution of Oceanography September 12, 2005
Who needs a Matrix? • Proponents • What are the drilling environment categories? • What data are required for each site? • Why? • Panels • Do submitted data meet requirements? • Are all required data in SSDB for a site? • All sites for a proposal?
Design Conflicts • Customized for specific situations • Requirements depend on details • Depth of penetration, geological environment, … • Many special cases • Detailed but important • But scalable to grow without breaking • New drilling technology presents new situations • Minimize code changes, while accommodating • Special cases • New requirements • Continue to provide graphical view • Status of site and proposal • Despite complexity and changes
Available Ingredients Matrix Working Group Report Needs of SSP and PPSP panels Discussion of requirements rules SSDB data types Access to standard data types in digital library for each proposal SSDB interface technology SSDBstatus SSDBquery
SSDB data types in digital library
SSDB interface technology SSDBstatus SSDBquery
What is needed now? Review rules Drilling environment category descriptions Relation to new SSDB standard data types Design interface Review design Build prototype Test prototype