slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Modeling and Simulation ITWG Jürgen Lorenz - Fraunhofer-IISB PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Modeling and Simulation ITWG Jürgen Lorenz - Fraunhofer-IISB

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 20

Modeling and Simulation ITWG Jürgen Lorenz - Fraunhofer-IISB - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 255 Views
  • Uploaded on

Modeling and Simulation ITWG Jürgen Lorenz - Fraunhofer-IISB. ITWG/ TWG Members. H. Jaouen, STM * W. Molzer, Infineon * R. Woltjer, Philips * G. Le Carval, LETI J. Lorenz, Fraunhofer IISB * W. Schoenmaker, IMEC # * : supported by EC User Group UPPER+ # : now with MAGWEL

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Modeling and Simulation ITWG Jürgen Lorenz - Fraunhofer-IISB' - kiri


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Modeling and Simulation ITWG

Jürgen Lorenz - Fraunhofer-IISB

ITWG/TWG Members

H. Jaouen, STM*

W. Molzer, Infineon*

R. Woltjer, Philips*

G. Le Carval, LETI

J. Lorenz, Fraunhofer IISB*

W. Schoenmaker, IMEC #

*: supported by EC User Group UPPER+

#: now with MAGWEL

T. Wada, SELETE

S. Sato, Fujitsu

Japanese TWG 15 industrial members

V. Bakshi, SEMATECH

C. Riccobene, AMD

V. Singh, INTEL

M. Orlowski, Motorola

M. Meyyappan, NASA

I. Bork, Synopsys

J. Wu, TI

E. Hall, Arizona State Univ.

J.-H. Choi, Hynix

K.H. Lee, Samsung

Y.T. Chia, TSMC

slide2

Technology Modeling SCOPE & SCALES

  • Equipment related
  • Equipment/Feature scale Modeling
  • Lithography Modeling
  • Feature scale
  • Front End Process Modeling
  • Device Modeling
  • Interconnects and
  • Integrated Passives Modeling
  • IC-scale
  • Circuit ElementsModeling
  • Package Simulation

•Materials Modeling

•Numerical Methods

slide3

Key Messages (I)

  • Mission of Modeling and Simulation as cross-cut topic:
  • Support areas covered by other (especially focus) ITWGs
  •  In-depth analysis of M&S needs of other ITWGs performed, based on
  • documents + inter-ITWG discussions
  • Modeling and simulation provides an ‘embodiment of knowledge and understanding’. It is a tool for technology/device development and optimization and also for training/education
  • Technology modeling and simulation is one of a few enabling methodologies that can accelerate development times and reduce development costs: Assessment up to 35% in 2003
  •  important not only in years of difficult economic conditions
slide4

Key Messages (II)

  • Art of modeling:
  • - Combine dedicated experiments & theory to extract physical mechanisms
  • & parameters
  • - Find appropriate trade-off between detailed physical simulation (CPU and
  • memory costly) and simplified but physically appropriate approaches
  • Accurate experimental characterization is essential
  • Further growing importance of atomistic/materials/hierarchical/multilevel simulation - appropriate treatment of nanostructures
  • Need for additional participation esp. from Korea and Taiwan
slide5

Crosscuts between M&S and other ITWGs

  • Detailed analysis of other ITRS chapters + discussions with other ITWGs as basis for 2003 M&S challenges and requirements tables, and text
  • This process is continued in 2004 - emphasis on tables - also as preparation for 2005
  • Crosscuts with focal ITWGs and other cross-cut ITWG described in detail
  • Links with ALL other ITWGs. Some examples:
  •  Design: Influence of process fluctuations, intrinsic statistics, noise,
          • reliability, ... on design
  •  Test: Extension of interconnect simulation towards simulation
          • of test equipment
  •  PIDS: Long list including modeling of new materials and new
          • device architectures, atomistic/quantum mechanical
          • simulation, fluctuations and variations,
          • coupled device/circuit/system simulation
slide6

Crosscuts between M&S and other ITWGs (cont.)

  • Some examples (cont.):
  •  FEP: Long list including modeling of material issues,
          • new device architectures, ultra-shallow junctions and
          • defect engineering, assessment of process variants
  •  Lithography: Push limits of optical lithography by optimization of
          • options; assessment of Next Generation Lithography
          • based on predictive physical models (e.g. efficient
          • solution of Maxwell equations)
  •  Interconnects: Large range of M&S support needed, from prediction of
          • material properties (e.g. resistivitiy of narrow Cu lines) to
          • impact of non-idealized interconnects on IC layout
  •  Factory Int.: Support shrink of technology implemented in fab line,
          • by equipment/process/device/circuit simulation.
          • Assess impact of process variations on yield
slide7

Crosscuts between M&S and other ITWGs (cont.)

  • Some examples (cont.):
  •  Assembly and Packaging:
          • Co-design issues: Chip and package,
          • mechanical/electrical/thermal simulation
  •  ESH: Bi-directional link w.r.t characterization and models for
          • gas composition and chemical reactions
  •  Yield Enhancement:
          • Simulation influence of defects and of
          • process fluctuations on devices/ICs/yield
  •  Metrology: M&S needs advanced metrology for development/
  • assessment of physical models.
          • Physical modeling to support metrology e.g. w.r.t. linking
          • measured spectra to gas composition, interpretation of
          • measured data, extension of measurements from 2D to 3D
slide8

Short-Term Challenges: 2003 and 2004 Changes

  • 2003 ITRS
  • Modeling hierarchy included  “Modeling of shallow junctions” extended
  • to “Front-End Process Modeling for Nanometer Structures”
  • • “Ultimate nano-scale CMOS simulation capability” pulled in from long-term, replacing & partly incorporating “Gate-stack models for ultra-thin dielectrics” (phenomenological models)
  • • 2002 long-term challenge “Thermal-Mechanical-Electrical Modeling for interconnections and packaging“ pulled in from long-term (6th short-term challenge)
  • More precise phrasing & shift of emphasis / new aspects in other challenges
  • 2004 ITRS:
  • High-frequency Device and Circuit Modeling for
  • 5–100 GHz Applications
  • Challenge “Modeling of Equipment Influences on Features Generated in

Deposition and Etching Processes“ updated to “Integrated Modeling of

Equipment, Materials, Feature Scale Processes and Influences on Devices”

  • Additionally stress co-design with packaging; reliability
slide9

2003 Difficult Challenges > 45 nm

Grand Challenge

Grand Challenge

slide10

2003 Short-term Difficult Challenges

High-Frequency Circuit Modeling for 5-40 Ghz Applications

  • Needs
  • Efficient extraction and simulation of full-chip interconnect delay
  • Accurate and yet efficient 3D interconnect models, esp. for transmission lines and S-parameters
  • High-frequency circuit models including
    • non-quasi-static effects
    • substrate noise
    • parasitic coupling
  • Parameter extraction assisted by numerical electrical simulation instead of RF measurement
  • Identified as one of the Grand Challenges !

(From Philips)

slide11

2003 Short-Term Difficult Challenges

Front-End Process Modeling for Nanometer Structures

Needs

  • Diffusion/activation/damage models and parameters incl. low thermal budget processes in Si-based substrate, e.g. Si, SiGe:C, (incl. strain), SOI and ultra-thin body devices
  • Characterization tools for ultra-shallow geometries and dopant levels
  • Modeling hierarchy from atomistic to continuum for dopants and defects in bulk and at interfaces
  • Identified as one of the Grand Challenges !

Source: A. Claverie, CEMES/CNRS, Toulouse, France

slide12

2003 Short-Term Difficult Challenges

Modeling of Equipment Influences on Features Generated in Deposition and Etching Processes

Needs

  • Fundamental physical data ( e.g. rate constants, cross sections, surface chemistry); reaction mechanisms and reduced models for complex chemistry
  • Linked equipment/feature scale models
  • CMP (full wafer and chip level, pattern dependent effects)
  • •MOCVD, PECVD and ALD modeling
  • • Multi-generation equipment/wafer models

Simulated across-wafer variation of feature profile for a sputter-deposited barrier.

(From Fraunhofer IISB)

slide13

2003 Short-Term Difficult Challenges

Lithography Simulation including NGL

Needs

  • Optical simulation of resolution enhancement techniques including mask optimization (OPC, PSM)
  • Predictive resist models incl. line-edge roughness, etch resistance and mechanical stability
  • Multi-generation lithography system models

Printing of defect on phase-shift mask: bump defect (top) vs. etch defect (lower)

(From Fraunhofer IISB)

slide14

2003 Short-Term Difficult Challenges

Ultimate Nanoscale CMOS Simulation Capability

Pulled in from long-term in 2003!

Needs

• Methods and algorithms that contribute

to prediction of CMOS limits

• Quantum based simulators

• Models and analysis to enable design

and evaluation of devices and architec-

tures beyond traditional planar CMOS

• Phenomenological gate stack models

for ultra-thin dielectrics

• Models for device impact of statistical

fluctuations in structures and dopant

distributions

classical

quantum

drain

source

courtesy Infineon / TU Munich

courtesy Infineon / TU Munich

Quantum-mechanical vs. classical carrier densitiy in double-gate transistor

slide15

2003 Short-Term Difficult Challenges

Thermal-Mechanical-Electrical Modeling for Interconnections and Packaging

Pulled in from long-term

in 2003!

Needs

• Model thermal-mechanical and

electronic properties of low-k,

high-k and conductors and the

impact of processing on these

properties

• Model reliability of packages

and interconnects, e.g. stress

voiding, electromigration,

piezoelectric effects; textures,

fracture, adhesion

courtesy TU Vienna /

IST project MULSIC

Temperature distribution in an interconnect structure

slide16

Long-Term Challenges: 2003 Status and 2004 Changes

  • “Extend beyond continuum tools” in 2003 shifted to short-term & integrated
  • there into various challenges, esp. “Front-End Process Simulation”
  • Instead: “Modeling of processing and electrical properties of new materials” - 2004 changed to “Modeling of Chemical, Thermomechanical, and Electrical Properties of New Materials“ - rest of 2002 short-term challenge “Gate-stack models for ultra-thin dielectrics” included here
  • “Ultimate nanoscale CMOS simulation capability“ in 2003 shifted
  • to short-term, including parts of old „gate stack modeling“ challenge
  • “Thermo-Mechanical-Electrical Modeling for Interconnections and Packaging” shifted to short-term in 2003
  • “Software Module Integration” skipped: Rather a requirement than a
  • challenge
  • Instead in 2003: “Nano-Scale Modeling” (e.g. nanotubes ...)
  • New 2003 challenge “Optoelectronics modeling”
slide18

Short-Term Requirements: 2003 Status & 2004 Discussion

  • General:
  • - Some items now in “zebra” colour - according to ITRS guidelines:
  • “Limitations of available solutions will not delay the start of production. In some cases, work-arounds will be initially employed. Subsequent improvement is expected to close any gaps for production performance in areas such as process control, yield, and productivity.“
    • This means for simulation: It can be used, but with more calibration,

larger CPU time/memory, less generality then in the end required ...

  • Items adapted to 2 years passed since 2001 ITRS & changes in requirements/technical progress
  • Lithography:
  • - In exposure simulation no more emphasis on evaluation of wavelengths, but on capabilities of simulation incl. mask features and CPU efficiency
  • - New: Full-chip lithography simulation
slide19

Short-Term Requirements: 2003 Status & 2004 Discussion

Gate stack: Short-term focus on high-k

Back-End Process/Equipment/Topography Modeling:

- More clear structure, according to kinds of processes to be simulated

Numerical device modeling:

- Instead of “bulk CMOS” and “non-bulk” CMOS now “Classical CMOS” and “Non-classical CMOS incl. channel-engineered devices”

- 2004: add “Novel memory devices” and “reliability”

“Circuit element modeling/ECAD” replaced by

“circuit component modeling”& now structured into “active devices” and

“Interconnects and integrated passives”.

2004: add “Process and Materials Impact on Electrical Performance“

Package modelingnow structuring into “electrical modeling” and “thermo-mecha-

nical modeling” instead of an item “thermo-mechanical-electrical integrated models”.2004: add “Material Properties”