400 likes | 592 Views
Outline. IntroSingle Factor ModelsTwo Factor ModelsThree Factor ModelsChoosing a Spot Price Model. Intro. Models for Pricing Energy DerivativesFormulated in Terms of the Spot Energy PriceDerivatives: Futures/Forwards, European OptionsRange: from 1 factor Black (1976) model to a three-factor
E N D
1. Book Review: Chapter 6 ’Spot Price Models and Pricing Standard Instruments’ Anatoliy Swishchuk
Dept of Math & Stat, U of C
‘Lunch at the Lab’ Talk
January 31st, 2007
2. Outline Intro
Single Factor Models
Two Factor Models
Three Factor Models
Choosing a Spot Price Model
3. Intro Models for Pricing Energy Derivatives
Formulated in Terms of the Spot Energy Price
Derivatives: Futures/Forwards, European Options
Range: from 1 factor Black (1976) model to a three-factor model with stochastic convenience yield and stochastic term structure of interest rate
Comments: seasonal factors
Volatility Smile + Numerical Techniques: Chapter 7 (Lance’s Talk)
4. Single Factor Models Futures and Forward Pricing
Option Pricing
The Schwartz Single Factor Model (Futures/Forward, Option Pricing)
5. Single Factor Models: SDE vs PDE
6. Futures and Forward Pricing (Black, 1976)
7. Volatilities (FP)=Volatility SP
8. Option Pricing (Black, 1976): European Futures Option
9. The Schwartz Single Factor Model (1997) Mean-Reverting
Positive S
Alpha-mean reverting rate
Mu-long term level
Lambda-market price of energy risk
10. The Schwartz Single Factor Model (x=ln S): SDE and PDE
11. Futures and Forward Pricing (Schwartz SF Model)
12. Futures and Forward Pricing (Schwartz SF Model): long maturity level and volatility
13. Futures Prices and Their Volatility (Schwartz SF Model):
14. European Call Option Pricing (Schwartz SFM): Clewlow, Strickland (1999)
15. European Call Option Pricing (Schwartz SFM): Clewlow, Strickland (1999): s=T
16. European Call Option Pricing (Schwartz SFM)
17. Comparison: Option Prices in the Black and Schwartz SFM
18. Two Factor Models (Stochastic Convenience Yield)
19. Two Factor Models (Stochastic Convenience Yield): PDE
20. Two Factor Models (Stochastic Convenience Yield): Futures/Forward Pricing (Schwartz(1997))
21. Two Factor Models (Stochastic Convenience Yield): Futures/Forward Pricing ( HR (1998))
22. Two Factor Models (Stochastic Convenience Yield): Futures Pricing (Schwartz(1997))
23. Two Factor Models (Stochastic Convenience Yield): Volatility of Futures Pricing (Schwartz(1997)&HR(1998))
24. Two Factor Models (Stochastic Convenience Yield): Volatility (Schwartz(1997))
25. Two Factor Models: Option Pricing (Clewlow & Strickland (1999))
26. The Schwartz 1 Factor Approximation: Rate of Change in the Futures Prices (Two Factor vs One Factor)
27. The Schwartz 1 Factor Approximation: Rate of Change in the Futures Prices (Two Factor vs One Factor, convenience yield)
28. The Schwartz 1 Factor Approximation: Rate of Change in the Futures Prices (Two Factor vs One Factor):Shadow Spot Price vs Futures Price
29. The Schwartz 1 Factor Approximation: Rate of Change in the Futures Prices (Two Factor vs One Factor):Shadow Spot Price vs Futures Price
30. Three Factor Models Schwartz (1997): extension of his TFM (Vasicek short term rate r)
Hillard & Reis (1998): interest rate follows HJM (1992) model
31. Three Factor Models: Schwartz (1997)
32. Three Factor Models: HR (1998)
33. Three Factor Models PDE: Schwartz (1997) &HR (1998)
34. Futures/Forward Pricing: (Three Factor Models, Schwartz (1997))
35. Futures/Forward Pricing: (Three Factor Models, HR (1998))
36. Volatility of the Futures Prices (S&HR)
37. TFM: Option Pricing (Milstein & Schwartz (1998))
38. Choosing a Spot Price Model For Short Maturity Options on Long Maturity Forward Contract: Black Model could be used
For Short Maturity Options on Short Maturity Forward Contract: Schwartz One Factor Model could be used
Large and Diverse Portfolio of Energy Contracts: Two Factor Stochastic Convenience Yield Model is good
39. Choosing a Spot Price Model II Not Necessary to Use Three Factor Model: Stochastic Interest Rate has a relatively minor impact on Energy Derivatives Prices
Jumps?-loss of the simple analytical solutions and numerical techniques
HR-presented a quasi-analytical solution for standard options under 3FM with jumps: but it’s not consistent with the attenuation of the jumps in the case of simple mean reversion
40. Summary
41. The End Thank You for Your Attention!