1 / 13

EU CLASS ACTIONS: A PRACTITIONER’S VIEWPOINT

Presented by Paul Llewellyn. EU CLASS ACTIONS: A PRACTITIONER’S VIEWPOINT. LORD STEYN HAS OBSERVED:.

kiersten
Download Presentation

EU CLASS ACTIONS: A PRACTITIONER’S VIEWPOINT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Presented by Paul Llewellyn EU CLASS ACTIONS: A PRACTITIONER’S VIEWPOINT

  2. LORD STEYN HAS OBSERVED: “The question is sometimes raised whether (our) system should be replaced by the system of class actions as it is known in the United States….. Massive awards for injuries, which are not of a serious kind, would rightly not be tolerated by English public opinion. (Further), it is a feature of class actions in the United States that firms of lawyers earn billions of dollars in cases which do not even come to trial and often result in meagre recoveries by individual claimants. This too would be unacceptable in England.

  3. LORD STEYN HAS OBSERVED (cont): Finally, I would say that in England there is a general perception among judges, in this respect reflecting public opinion, that the tort system is becoming too expensive and wasteful. There is also an unarticulated but nevertheless real conviction among judges that we must not allow our social welfare state to become a society bent on litigation. The introduction of United States-style class action cannot but contribute to such unwelcome developments in our legal system”

  4. THE HOUSE OF LORDS’ IN TOMLINSON V. CONGLETON BOROUGH COUNCIL AND OTHERS: “The pursuit of an unrestrained culture of blame and compensation has many evil consequences and one is certainly the interference with the liberty of the citizen”.

  5. MICHAEL HAUSFELD: “…a crusade to export America’s legal system around the world”. “The future in Europe for both law and society is good”.

  6. WHERE ARE WE GOING?

  7. EUROPEAN MOTIVES • Enhancing access to justice • Providing effective remedies • Deterring corporate malpractice • Maintaining fair competition

  8. EUROPEAN RESTRAINTS ON CLASS ACTIONS • No juries • No punitive damages • No contingency fees • Loser pays • Limited discovery

  9. THREATS TO THE RESTRAINTS • Changes in litigation culture • Raising of claimant expectations • Changes to meet disappointed expectations • The privatisation of proceedings • EU initiatives

  10. EU GREEN PAPER ON PRIVATE ANTITRUST CLAIMS • Class actions • Greater discovery • Double damages • Loser does not pay “…encouraging a competition culture, not a litigation culture.”

  11. IN THE UK • The Women & Work Commission Reports • Better Regulation Task Force Report on legal redress

  12. WHERE IS THE NEED?

More Related