1 / 20

TB diagnosis in peripheral health care centres

Improving direct microscopy by overnight bleach sedimentation: a simple tool for peripheral Health Centres. Maryline Bonnet 1 , Laramie Gagnidze 1 , Willie Githui 2 , Francis Varaine 3 , Andrew Ramsay 4,5 , Philippe J Guerin 1

Download Presentation

TB diagnosis in peripheral health care centres

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Improving direct microscopy by overnight bleach sedimentation: a simple tool for peripheral Health Centres Maryline Bonnet1, Laramie Gagnidze1, Willie Githui2, Francis Varaine3, Andrew Ramsay4,5, Philippe J Guerin1 1Epicentre, 2Centre for Respiratory Diseases Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, 3Médecins Sans Frontières, 4Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, 5TDR/WHO

  2. TB diagnosis in peripheral health care centres • Ziehl-Neelsen Direct Smear microscopy • Only available tool in most settings • 50% sensitivity • No new test expected in near future • Improvement of smear microscopy • Sputum collection (e.g. sputum induction) • Sputum processing (e.g. sputum concentration) • Staining and reading (e.g. fluorescence microscopy)

  3. Rationale • Sodium hypochlorite (“household bleach”) with overnight sedimentation • Encouraging results • Could be implemented in any setting • Still no recommendations due to study limitations

  4. Objective • To evaluate the diagnostic yield and feasibility of microscopy after overnight bleach sedimentation in a peripheral laboratory • To compare direct smear microscopy and overnight bleach sedimentation • Smear-positive patient detection • Smear-positive specimen detection • To evaluate practical aspects of overnight bleach sedimentation

  5. Method • Population • Mathare, Nairobi • High HIV prevalence • > 15 years, pulmonary TB suspects (cough > 2 weeks) • Consecutive sampling • Procedure • Collection of 3 sputa in 2 days • Hot Ziehl Neelsen method

  6. Bleach 3.5% Specimen liquifaction with bleach Overnight sedimentation on the bench Ziehl Neelsen microscopy on the sediment

  7. Method • Case definitions • Smear-positive result: > 9 AFB/100 fields • Smear-positive patient • > 2 smear-positive results • > 1 smear-positive result • Analysis • McNemar test for comparison of matched data • Kappa coefficient for inter-reader and test-retest reliability (K >0.8: very good reliability)

  8. Results: Trial profile Total screened N= 788 Less than 15 years old =1 Impossibility to produce sputum = 7 Cough < 2 weeks = 20 ICF not signed =63 Other =1 Included N= 696 52 no sputum Analysed N= 644 patients

  9. Patients’ characteristics • Mean age: 32.5 years (SD 10.3) • Sex ratio, M/F: 0.8 • Past TB history:121 (18.8%) • Intake of antibiotics in the last 2 weeks: 37 (5.7%) • Production of 3 sputa: 614 (95.3%)

  10. Smear-positive TB patient detection • Definition of smear-positive patient : > 2 positive smears (N=621) • 121 (19.5%) with bleach method compared to 105 (16.9%) with direct smear method, p=0.02 • 16 (15.2%) additional patients detected with bleach method • 4 (3.8%) missed cases

  11. Smear-positive patient detection • Definition of smear-positive patient: > 1 positive smear (N=644) • 138 (21.4%) with bleach method compared to 120 (18.6%) with direct smear method, p=0.001 • 18 (15.0%) additional patients detected with bleach method • 1 (0.8%) missed case

  12. Smear-positive patient detection • Bleach on 2 first sputa versus direct smear microscopy on 3 sputa (N= 644) • Definition of smear-positive patient > 1 positive smear • 133 (20.7%) with bleach method compared to 120 (18.6%) with direct smear method, p=0.01 • 18 (13.5%) additional patients detected with bleach method • 5 (4.2%) missed cases

  13. Smear-positive specimen detection

  14. Practical aspects • Test reliability • Inter-observer Kappa 0.81 (95% CI 0.71-0.85) • Test-retest Kappa 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-0.95) • Mean duration of bleach sedimentation • Specimen bleaching: 18.6 min • Overnight sedimentation: 16.8 hours • Mean duration of Ziehl-Neelsen method • Smearing & drying: 52.9 min versus 21.4 min • Staining: 45.0 min versus 47.1 min • Reading: 3.5 min with both methods

  15. Discussion • Study strengths • Prospective and controlled • Outpatient suspected TB cases in peripheral clinic • Standardised concentration method • Practical aspects • Reliability data • Study limitations Absence of comparison to the culture Gold Standard

  16. Advantages & disadvantages of the bleach method • Disadvantages • Risk of artefacts • Fragile smears • Delay in diagnosis • No standard bleach quality • Advantages • Signifiant increase of TB patient detection • Good reliability • Ease of use • Inexpensive • Bleach readily available

  17. Conclusions • Effective, simple and affordable • Further research needed • Best strategy based on cost-effectiveness analysis • Feasibility in routine program conditions • Overnight BS and fluorescence microscopy • Shorter sedimentation time

  18. Acknowledgements • Médecins Sans Frontières, study promotor • Stéphanie Charrondière • Tom, Purity, Ali, Andrew and Lucy • The team in Blue House • The team in the Mycobacteriological Laboratory, KEMRI • The Kenyan National TB Control Program

  19. Smear-positive TB patient detection

More Related