200 likes | 326 Views
This document presents an exploration of advanced parametric methods in signal processing, focusing on Deterministic Maximum Likelihood (DML) and Stochastic Maximum Likelihood (SML) techniques. It covers key topics such as performance metrics, coherence challenges, Gaussian noise modeling, and subspace-based approximations. The analysis highlights the advantages of SML in terms of sample accuracy, particularly in low SNR and highly correlated signal environments. Additionally, it discusses subspace fitting methods and the importance of eigenvector weighting. This work aims to enhance understanding and application of these methods in real-world scenarios.
E N D
Parametric Methods 指導教授:黃文傑 W.J. Huang 學生:蔡漢成 H.C. Tsai
Outline • DML (Deterministic Maximum Likelihood) • SML (Stochastic Maximum Likelihood) • Subspace-Based Approximations
DML (Deterministic Maximum Likelihood)-1 • Performance of spectral-… is not sufficient • Coherent signal increase the difficulties • Noise independent • Noise as a Gaussian white, whereas the signal …deterministic and unknown
DML-2 • Skew-symmetric cross-covariance • x(t) is white Gaussian with meanPDF of one measurement vector x(t)
DML-3 • Likelihood function is obtained as • Unknown parameters • Solved by
DML-4 • By solving the following minimization
DML-5 • X(t) are projected onto subspace orthogonal to all signal components • Power measurement • Remove all true signal on projected subspace , energy ↓
SML (Stochastic Maximum Likelihood) -1 • Signal as Gaussian processes • Signal waveforms be zero-mean with second-order property
SML-2 Vectorx(t) is white, zero-mean Gaussian random vector with covariance matrix -log likelihood function (lSML) is proportional to
SML-3 • For fixed ,minima lSML to find the
SML-4 • SML have a better large sample accuracy than the corresponding DML estimates ,in low SNR and highly correlated signals • SML attain the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRB)
Subspace-Based Approximations • MUSIC estimates with a large-sample accuracy as DML • Spectral-based method exhibit a large bias in finite samples, leading to resolution problems,especially for high source correlation • Parametric subspace-based methods have the same statistical performance as the ML methods • Subspace Fitting methods
Subspace Fitting-1 • The number of signal eigenvector is M’ • Us will span an M’–dimentional subspace of A
Subspace Fitting-2 Form the basis for the Signal Subspace Fitting (SSF)
Subspace Fitting-3 • and T are unknown , solve Us=AT • T is “nuisance parameter ” • instead Distance between AT and
Subspace Fitting-4 • For fix unknown A , • concentrated Introduce a weighting of the eigenvectors
WSF (Weighting SF)-1 • Projected eigenvectors • W should be a diagonal matrix containing the inverse of the covariance matrix of
WSF -2 • WFS and SML methods also exhibit similar small sample behaviors • Another method,
NSF(Noise SF)-1 V is some positive define weighting matrix
NSF-2 • For V =I NSF method can reduce to the MUSIC • is a quadratic function of the steering matrix A