1 / 16

Safety Auditors Conference 2005

Safety Auditors Conference 2005. A Practical Approach……. ……of Safety Management Audits for Tertiary Education Institutions. By Martha M. McDougall San Diego, California. Safety Management Model. Safety Policy Organization Planning and Implementation Measuring Performance

Download Presentation

Safety Auditors Conference 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Safety Auditors Conference 2005 A Practical Approach…….

  2. ……of Safety Management Audits for Tertiary Education Institutions • By Martha M. McDougall San Diego, California

  3. Safety Management Model • Safety Policy • Organization • Planning and Implementation • Measuring Performance • Reviewing Performance • Audit Process

  4. Reasons for a Safety Management Program Audit/Review • Reorganization • Retirement • New Leadership • Strategic Positioning • Negative Regulatory Inspection • “Enlightened” Senior Management

  5. Types of Audits/Reviews • Focused • General • Self Assessment • University Internal Audit • Compliance Inspection • Checklists

  6. Indicators of a Strong Program • Control • Cooperation • Communication • Competence • Leadership • Integration

  7. A Program Review….. • …..includes intangibles • Work Environment • Stakeholder Impressions • Program Responsiveness

  8. Preparing for a Review • PLAN • IDENTIFY Team Members • IDENTIFY Interviewees • ASSEMBLE documentation • COMMUNICATE • SCHEDULE Meetings with Various Stakeholders

  9. During the Review • Opening Conference • Review Charge and Scope • Agree on Confidentiality and Reporting • To Whom to Report Urgent Problems • Schedule Exit Conference

  10. Reviewer Ground Rules • Remain as objective as possible • LISTEN • Observe and understand local culture • Maintain strict confidentiality – no names • Ask general questions and drill down • Make no assumptions

  11. Stakeholder Meetings • Safety Director, EHS Managers separately • EHS Staff • Peer Managers • Lab PI’s, Supervisors, Technicians • Estates Office, Development Office • Personnel, Health Services, and others • Facilitate Discussions

  12. Observations • Is there a Safety Policy? • Is there a Campus Safety Committee? • Does everyone understand their own role? • Are there signs of EHS interaction with the campus community? • Is training being conducted? • Are safety procedures available and publicised? • Is there a contractor management program? • Does the EHS strategic plan complement the campus plan? Any goals and objectives listed? • Are there performance measures? Risk prioritization?

  13. Observations, continued • EHS facilities adequate? Location? Waste Facility adequate? • Status of safety equipment? (e.g. fire extinguisher checks, fume cupboards, biological safety cabinet certifications? Emergency safety showers?) • Is there an accident and injury management program? • Is there an Emergency Management program? • Is there a document control system? • Is there an Internal audit program? • Do annual performance evaluations include standards for health and safety?

  14. Exit Conference • Overview of site visit • Overall status of Safety Management Program – Strengths and Weaknesses, Areas for Improvement • Findings in broad categories • Tentative key recommendations – shape to fit institutional culture • Provide opportunity for clarification and additional information • Timetable for submitting final report • Q and A with attendees

  15. After the Review • Written report must be timely and well documented. • Send draft to Safety Director for review of names, places, spelling, etc • Final Report within 2 weeks

  16. Summary • Many types of audits and reviews • Auditor must not make assumptions! • Auditor must listen, observe, communicate and understand the culture • Planning and preparation is essential

More Related