1 / 35

Concepts and Categorization

Concepts and Categorization. Categorization and Concepts. Basic cognitive function is to categorize Use experience to aid in future behavior and decision-making Cognitive economy Concepts Mental representation of a category serving multiple functions

kelda
Download Presentation

Concepts and Categorization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Concepts and Categorization

  2. Categorization and Concepts • Basic cognitive function is to categorize • Use experience to aid in future behavior and decision-making • Cognitive economy • Concepts • Mental representation of a category serving multiple functions • We can use associations to organize the environment and our behavior • Distill our experience (knowledge) by utilizing functional relations

  3. Functions of Concepts • Classification • Determine category membership • Understanding, making predictions, inference • Once classified one can then understand its relevant parts, know how to interact with it, infer other properties • Explanation and Reasoning • For example, of others’ behavior • Learning • New entities compared to and understood in terms of old and provide feedback for modification • Communication • Shared concepts and categorization allow for easier expression of ideas to others

  4. Categories • Categories • Collection of objects, attributes, oractions, etc. • List of concepts • Hierarchy • Set of entities or examples picked out by the concept • How is experience distilled? How are functional relations established? • Category learning • How is knowledge represented in a category? • Structure • Schema • General knowledge structure that integrates objects, attributes, and actions into a cohesive representation • Script • Sequence • How do we use categorical knowledge?

  5. Classification • Determining the category membership of various things (objects, properties, abstractions etc.) • Allows for treating otherwise discriminable entities as similar • Similarity as the organizing principle for categories and categorization

  6. Structure of Categories • Classical View • Natural categories were structured in terms of necessary and sufficient features • If some entity has the set of necessary and sufficient features, it belongs to that category, otherwise it does not • Rigid category boundaries

  7. Classical view • Problems • Duck-billed platypus and brown dwarf • There simply do not seem to be defining features for many categories • Perhaps features are not available to consciousness? Uncertain as to whether the necessary feature is present? • Unlikely as folks are in disagreement as to what would constitute category membership (even with themselves at different times) • Even when certain, some examples are obviously better than others • Bye-bye classical view

  8. Probabilistic View • Certain features may be necessary, and so weighted heavily in categorization • Probabilistic features, which are usually present but not always, will also influence categorization • E.g. Flies, for birds • How might we classify and represent structured knowledge? • Features/Typicality • Theories • Prototype • Exemplar

  9. “Dogs” Great Dane Chihuahua Labrador Features and typicality • Some instances may have more features than others • The more frequently a category member’s properties appear within a category the more typical a member it is • Robins vs. Penguins • Arrange objects based on some attribution. • Comparison to average member (central tendency) • Based on experience with category which may be different for different folks

  10. Prototype • Categorization instead may reflect typicality judgments based on comparison to an ideal • Concepts as abstractions • People abstract common elements of a formed category and use a common representation to stand for that category • How is the category updated? • Family Resemblance • Overlap of common attributes • Classification is made based on overlap between prototype and exemplar

  11. Prototype • The prototype view can explain both typicality effects and the fact that prototypes that had not been previously presented are correctly classified (even more accurately) • Problems with prototype explanation • Doesn’t take into account category size or variability in examples • Context • What may be more typical in one setting may not be elsewhere • Correlations among attributes • E.g. smaller birds more likely to sing • Implies linear separability among categories • Categorization is perfect by adding up and weighing the evidence from features present • If this is not the case for separating categories, one would be hard pressed to come up with worthwhile prototypes

  12. Exemplar theory • Exemplar theory • Sort of a bottom up approach to categorization • Each instance is compared to others from past experience • Category arises by the lumping together of similar exemplars • Similarity based retrieval • Since the exemplar approach retains more information about the category itself it gets around some of the problems faced by the prototype theory (e.g. context effects), but also how a prototype could be recognized at test when wasn’t presented previously • Has similarity to previous examples and activates those stored representations

  13. Exemplar/Prototype theory • Hybrid view • Perhaps a little of both* • It may be that concepts rarely consist of only prototype or exemplar representation • Once rule is learned categorize according to it. When exceptions arise, use an exemplar approach • E.g. grammatical rules • MC’s thought for the day: metacategorization • How do we classify the empirical evidence as supporting (belonging to) one theory or another?

  14. Between Category structure • Up to this point the discussion has focused on classifying items within one category or another i.e. how a particular category is represented • Within category structure • But how are categories themselves organized? • Between category structure

  15. Types of Categories • Examples • Abstract vs. Concrete • Love vs. Mammal • Hierarchical vs. Non • Mammal vs. woman • Different processes required? • Hard to determine difference in kind

  16. Hierarchical • Membership assumes a hierarchy such that classification in a subordinate category means an exemplar belongs to the superordinate category • Poodle  Animal • Basic level • The default category classification • How will an item be typically classified? • Poodle as dog rather than animal • The basic level is found at a middle level of abstraction (e.g. between type of dog and more abstract categories like Living) • Typically learned first, the natural level at which objects are named and the level at which exemplars are likely to share the most features • With expertise, the basic level may move to a subordinate level • Child: Dog vs. Cat • Adult: Poodle vs. Irish setter • Expert: Minature vs. Toy

  17. Structure of Categories • Rosch • Hierarchal structure of concepts Vehicles CAR TRUCK BOAT Sedan Sports SUV Garbage Row Yacht -Corvette -Mustang

  18. Vehicles CAR TRUCK BOAT Sedan Sports SUV Garbage Row Yacht Structure of Categories • Vertical = Level of abstraction • Horizontal = variability within category

  19. Vertical Structure Vehicles Superordinate CAR TRUCK BOAT Basic Sedan Sports SUV Garbage Row Yacht Subordinate Superordinate = defines category Basic = overlap of common features Subordinate = examplars

  20. Vehicles Superordinate CAR TRUCK BOAT Basic Sedan Sports SUV Garbage Row Yacht Properties of Hierarchy • Each level gives a similar degree of information • Converging operations for Basic Level • Common attributes • Shape similarity • Ease of labeling • Similar verification time Subordinate

  21. Non-hierarchical • No clear structure • How would you classify yourself? • No clear hierarchy, no basic level • E.g. socially relevant categories to which a member may belong to several • The various applicable categories can be seen as competing for classification rights • Those used more frequently and recently will be more likely applied for classifying a new instance • E.g. gender, race

  22. What processes are involved in categorization? • Does judgment of similarity in and of itself explain categorization? • Variable • People’s judgments of similarity change depending on the situation • Medin Goldstone & Gentner (1993) • Depending on which pair of objects shown would change what determined a judgment of similarity

  23. Similarity • What constraints if any are placed on determinations of similarity? What constraints does similarity place on what counts as a feature? • Rocks and squirrels • Both exist, are bounded, can be run over etc. • Can similarity alone explain classification? • Perhaps serves as guideline rather than definitive delineator • Abandoned if additional info suggests it is misleading • Gelman & Markman (1986)

  24. Classification by theory • Organization of concepts is knowledge-based as opposed to similarity-based • Apply theory to the data • Concepts develop and change with experience/evidence • E.g. various mental disorders • Theory and Similarity • Theories will affect similarity judgments • Similarity constrains theory • Psychological essentialism • The way people approach the world • Essences of things (e.g. what makes male or female)

  25. Models of Categorization • Generalized Context Model • Exemplar-Based Random Walk • See Nosofsky link on class webpage • ALCOVE • Combinations of exemplar and rule-based processing • Decision-bound approaches • Rational model • Anderson

  26. Categorization and memory • What memory system or systems are used during category learning? • Essentially theories of category learning virtually all assumed a single category learning system • E.g. exemplar theory • When a novel stimulus is encountered, its similarity is computed to the memory representation of every previously seen exemplar from each potentially relevant category, and a response is chosen on the basis of these similarity computations • Category learning uses many, or perhaps all of the major memory systems that have been hypothesized by memory researchers.

  27. Working memory • Heavily used in reasoning and problem solving • Could be the primary mediating memory system in tasks where the categories are learned quickly. • Two possibilities: • The categories contain few enough exemplars that the process of explicitly memorizing their category labels does not exceed the span of working memory • Though possible, probably unlikely, however if comparisons are made to a single ideal or prototype perhaps • Working memory could be used if the category structures were simple enough that they could be discovered quickly via a logical reasoning process. • In other words if the means of categorization can be reduced to one or two dimensions (e.g. some rule)

  28. Working memory • Evidence • Single rule-based categorization is interfered with in divided attention tasks where more complex category learning is not • Rule-based category learning is possibly mediated by a conscious process of hypothesis generation and testing. • If the feedback indicates response was incorrect, then must decide whether to try the same rule again, or whether to switch to a new rule • If the latter decision is made then a new rule must be selected and attention must be switched from the old rule to the new. • Such operations require attention and working memory.

  29. Episodic and semantic memory • Memory for personally experienced events and general world knowledge • No empirical evidence from category learning suggests separate contributions of episodic and semantic memory systems • These declarative memory systems are used during explicit memorization, so category structures that encourage memorization are especially likely to be learned via these systems. • Two conditions: • First, memorization is an especially effective strategy if each category contains a small number of perceptually distinct exemplars. • Second, other simpler strategies are ineffective • Indirect evidence from successful exemplar-based models that assume use of stored representations from prior learning • Some direct evidence from amnesiacs that suffer in category learning

  30. Non-declarative memory • Procedural knowledge • Memories of skills that are learned through practice • Little awareness of details • Is slow and incremental and it requires immediate and consistent feedback • Like declarative memory systems, would not be utilized for simple rule-based categorization • Example of radiologists and tumors • Many exemplars in the set of X-rays, but identification takes practice and process is not well-defined by practitioners • Evidence • Information integration (more complex multi-dimensional categorization) tasks affected similarly as serial reaction time tasks • Changing the way in which one responds (key press) leads to poorer performance that is not seen in simple rule-based categorization tasks • As with procedural tasks, complex category learning can be hindered without appropriately timed feedback

  31. Perceptual learning • The specific and relatively permanent modification of perception and behavior following sensory experience • No behavioral evidence implicating the perceptual representation system, jury out on neuropsych evidence

  32. Use of categories in reasoning • Ad hoc categories • Spontaneously constructed for the purposes of some goal • Constructed differently from other categories? • Show similar results e.g. typicality effects, however, more of a comparison to an ideal rather than prototype • Gist: goals can affect category structure • Conceptual combination • Construction of new concepts by combining the previous representations • Recall structural alignment • Typicality may not be predictable from previous concepts • Properties of new concepts may not be present in old.

  33. Use of Categories • Classification • Process of assigning objects to categories • Treat (use) different “things” as the same • Explanation • Bringing knowledge to bear in novel situation • By classifying a novel event into an existing category, an explanation is provided.

  34. Use of Categories • Prediction • Understanding of an event guides reactions and behaviors • Allows us to expect certain outcomes or properties • Reasoning • Categories are the basis for inferences • Allow categorical knowledge to stand for an event • Allows for “filling-in” of ambiguous information • Allow for conceptual combinations • Paper Bee • Wooden Spoon

  35. Other stuff • Just because two instances might be lumped together under one category, does not mean we experience them similarly • Ferrari vs a Tempo • Some would say we experience events, not categories • Recall ‘situated action’

More Related