trouble with twibel and other social media legal issues n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Trouble with “ Twibel ” and Other Social Media Legal Issues PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Trouble with “ Twibel ” and Other Social Media Legal Issues

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 29

Trouble with “ Twibel ” and Other Social Media Legal Issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 113 Views
  • Uploaded on

Trouble with “ Twibel ” and Other Social Media Legal Issues. Jeffrey C. Sun Associate Professor, University of North Dakota Visiting Scholar, The Ohio State University. Messaging. Messaging. Social Media by the Numbers. 1.1 billion users 232 million users 259 million users

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Trouble with “ Twibel ” and Other Social Media Legal Issues' - kaylee


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
trouble with twibel and other social media legal issues

Trouble with “Twibel” and Other Social Media Legal Issues

Jeffrey C. Sun

Associate Professor, University of North Dakota

Visiting Scholar, The Ohio State University

social media by the numbers
Social Media by the Numbers

1.1 billion users

232 million users

259 million users

150 million users

70 million users

college students and social media

Today’s students are more likely to use:

Instagram

Text messaging

Snap chat

Twitter

#collegefessions

Vine

College Students and Social Media
slide7

Communication Boundaries

  • online privacy,
  • virtual reputations, and
  • digital amplification
slide8

http://www.whsv.com/news/headlines/Websites-Host-Controversial-Student-Dialogue--231823111.htmlhttp://www.whsv.com/news/headlines/Websites-Host-Controversial-Student-Dialogue--231823111.html

social media free speech
LEGAL RED FLAGSSocial Media & Free Speech

“True” Threat

Disruption

Harassment, Stalking

Hate

Defamation

Invasion of Privacy

Violations of Professional Codes in Academic Setting

case 1 discussion
Case #1: Discussion
  • What do you say to …
    • the brother of one resident,
    • the resident who spoke to the RA, and
    • the parent who called UCC?
  • What do you do?
    • What do you communicate to Marco and how? Do you take any actions? What are your justifications?
    • What services might you recommend or how might you reach out to this student?
true threat considerations
True Threat Considerations
  • Reaction- the reaction of those who heard the alleged threat;
  • Conditional- whether the threat was conditional;
  • Direct Communication- whether the person who made the alleged threat communicated it directly to the object of the threat;
  • Frequency- whether the speaker had a history of making threats against the person purportedly threatened; and
  • Propensity for Violence- whether the recipient had a reason to believe that the speaker had a propensity to engage in violence
case 1 discussion cont d
Case #1: Discussion (cont’d)
  • How might your responses change if …
    • the posting was pursuant to a course blogging activity? Does it matter if the course is a creative writing course?
    • several females in the residence hall, who were aware of these postings, reported Marco leering and moving his tongue with a snake like movement when he was alone with them in the staircase? The reports came in within the past 3 weeks.
case 2 discussion
Case #2: Discussion
  • You are the academic program director for the nursing clinical program. What do you do?
  • The program director consults the Dean of Students. What do you say as Dean of Students?
case 3 discussion
Case #3: Discussion
  • The program director consults the Dean of Students. He is particularly concerned that the University Police is not taking any action. As Dean of Students, what do you consider before responding, what do you ask, and how might you proceed?
professional conduct education

American Nursing Association & National Council of State Boards of Nursing

Liaison Committee on Medical Education

Professional Conduct Education

Source: https://www.ncsbn.org/2930.htm

case 4 discussion
Case #4: Discussion
  • Should Evan have “friended” Marci? What are reasons that support his decision? What are reasons that do not support his decision?
  • Students often gripe about college policies and procedures. At what point, if at all, should Evan have responded or communicated something to Marci? What should he have done and why?
  • Should Marci be held to a higher standard since she is a student leader?
  • What would you advise Evan if Marci and her friends criticized the competency of Evan’s co-workers or supervisor (as opposed to just discontent about decisions made)?
case 4 discussion cont d
Case #4: Discussion (cont’d)
  • How might your response above be different if the events took place at a public college?
  • Would any of your responses be different if Marci removed the postings (e.g., cleared her wall as a matter of practice every week)?
  • How would your responses change if Marci created a specific website for OLC students to gripe (e.g.,www.TheDarkSideofOLC.com)?
  • Marci’s communications presented cyber-gripes about administrative decisions. What if her gripes were about information regarding a cheating scandal on-campus? That is, she posted references about students cheating (or allegations of students’ cheating) by getting a copy of the publisher test bank for a class. If you were Evan, what might you do?
harassment through cyber revenge

What does the Code of Student Conduct say?

The university student code of conduct prohibited “extreme, outrageous or persistent acts, or communications that are intended or reasonably likely to harass, intimidate, harm, or humiliate another.”

 Not Overbroad

Not Vague

Sexual Misconduct by an Avatar: http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/02/25/bugeja

Consider OCR 2011 DCL, Montana Agreement, and SUNY Agreement; see also ELA/NASPA Guidance, http://www.naspa.org/rpi/reports/legal-links-volume-1-issue-1

Harassment Through Cyber Revenge
other considerations

State Laws such as California’s Leonard Law

see, e.g., Yu v. University of La Verne

Qualified Immunity

see, e.g., Zimmerman v. Bd. of Trs. Of Ball State Univ.

Open Records

Privacy

State Law Restrictions - Ark. Code Ann. § 6-60-104 (2014); Cal. Educ. Code § 99121 (2014); Ill. Comp Stat. § 75/10 (2014); N.M. Stat. Ann. § 21-1-46 (2013).

Stored Communications Act

see, e.g., Rodriguez v. Widener Univ.

Other Considerations
oftentimes beyond the university
(oftentimes) Beyond the University
  • Defamation: a false and unprivileged statement of fact that is defamatory about a target person and published with fault (e.g., defamation per se – STD or incompetence)
    • Can republish - retweet
  • Invasion of Privacy: (false light) A person who gives publicity to a matter concerning another that places the person in a false light, is subject to liability for invasion of privacy if the false light causes the other person to be viewed in a way that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person and the speaker acted with reckless disregard of the falsity of the publicized matter. 
special provisions
Special Provisions
  • Presence of Social Media (New Jersey)
  • Access
  • Observation
    • Shoulder Surfing (e.g., California, Delaware, Michigan, New Mexico)
    • Link/Friend (e.g., Arkansas, Delaware, Michigan, Wisconsin)
    • Monitor (e.g., Delaware, Michigan – but okay in Utah)
    • Change Privacy Settings (e.g., Arkansas)
  • Waiver of Rights (New Jersey)
  • Any Social Media Information (California)
special provisions cont d
Special Provisions (cont’d)
  • Indirect Access
    • Not Okay – Delaware
    • Okay – Arkansas, Michigan, New Mexico, Utah, Wisconsin)
  • Exceptions (Delaware, Illinois, Oregon)
  • No Duty to Monitor (Michigan, Utah, Wisconsin)
  • No Liability if viewed (Oregon, Utah, Wisconsin)
  • Damages
    • Injunction (Michigan, New Jersey), Damages (with caps – Michigan, Utah, Wisconsin), Attorney’s Fees (Michigan, New Jersey), Court Costs, and Criminal (Michigan)
adopt or not adopt formal internet usage policies
Adopt or Not Adopt Formal Internet Usage Policies?
  • Revisit existing internet usage policies.
  • Focus on “unacceptable online behaviors” or improving ethical “digital citizenship” among student users.
  • Do not tailor internet usage policies to specific technologies as they will change quickly.
slide27
Develop Specific Policies Covering the Boundaries of Student Online Interaction with Faculty and Staff
  • Policies and culture of “friending”
    • How informed are faculty, staff, and students about their activities to friend each other as well as alumni, legislators, and college constituents?
  • Working with “cyber griping”
    • An online “gripe site” is a type of website devoted exclusively to the critique and/or mockery of a person, place, corporation or institution.
    • What can we do to manage the situation and why?
    • What have we learned from the cyber griping experience?
slide29

Q&A

NASPA Legal Links

www.highereducationlaw.org

July 2014

Professor of Higher Education

University of Louisville