common nonparametric statistical techniques in behavioral sciences n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Common Nonparametric Statistical Techniques in Behavioral Sciences PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Common Nonparametric Statistical Techniques in Behavioral Sciences

Common Nonparametric Statistical Techniques in Behavioral Sciences

267 Views Download Presentation
Download Presentation

Common Nonparametric Statistical Techniques in Behavioral Sciences

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Common Nonparametric Statistical Techniques in Behavioral Sciences Chi Zhang, Ph.D. University of Miami June, 2005

  2. Objectives • Assumptions for nonparametric statistics • Scales of measurement • Advantages and disadvantages of nonparametric statistics • Nonparametric tests for the single-sample case • Nonparametric tests for two related samples • Nonparametric tests for two independent samples • The case of k related samples • The case of k independent samples

  3. Assumptions about Parametric Statistics • A normally distributed population • Equal variances among the population • The observation must be independent • The variables must be measured at interval or ratio scale

  4. Assumptions about Nonparametric Statistics • Nonparametric (distribution free) techniques make no assumptions bout the population • The fewer the assumptions, the more general are the conclusions • The more powerful tests are those that have the strongest or most extensive assumptions

  5. Advantages of Nonparametric Statistical Tests • May be the only test when the sample size is small • Require fewer assumptions • The only choice when the measurement scales are nominal or ordinal (e.g. using categories, rankings, medians)

  6. Disadvantages of Nonparametric Statistical Tests • They are less powerful • They are unfamiliar to many researchers and editors

  7. Scales of Measurement • Nominal or categorical (e.g. gender, nationality) • Ordinal (e.g. ranking, ratings) • Interval (e.g. temperature) • Ratio (e.g. age, distance, weight)

  8. The Chi-square Goodness of Fit (Single-sample Case) • It assesses the degree of correspondence between the observed and expected observations in each category • Measurement scale: nominal or categorical • Small expected frequencies (when df = 1, freq (exp) => 5; when df > 1, 20%+ freq (exp) => 5)

  9. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov One-sample Test (Single-sample Case) • It tests the goodness of fit for variable which are measured on at least ordinal scale • It involves specifying the cumulative frequency distribution which would occur given the theoretical distribution ( e.g. normal distribution) and comparing that with the observed cumulative frequency distribution

  10. The NcNemar Test(Two related samples) • It is particularly applicable to “before and after” designs in which each subject is used as its own control • The measurements are made on either a nominal or ordinal scale

  11. The Sign Test(Two related samples) • For research in which quantitative measurement is impossible or infeasible • It is possible to determine, for each pair of observations, which is the “greater” • The only assumption is that the variable has a continuous distribution

  12. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test(Two related samples) • All the observations must be measured at ordinal scale • Ranking the differences observed for the various matched pairs • Power-efficiency is about 95% of that of paired t-test

  13. The Chi-square Test for Two Independent Samples • Suitable for nominal or stronger data • Determining whether the two samples are from populations that differ in any respect at all (e.g. location, dispersion, skewness)

  14. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Two Sample Tests • Ordinal or stronger data • It tests whether two independent samples have been drawn from populations with the same distribution • The test is concerned with the agreement between two cumulative distributions

  15. The Man-Whitney U Test(two independent samples) • It tests whether two samples represent populations that differ in central tendency • Variables measured at least at ordinal scale • One of the most powerful of the nonparametric tests • A useful alternative to t-test

  16. The Case of k Related Samples • The Friedman two-way ANOVA by ranks is appropriate when the measurements of the variables are at least ordinal • The Friedman two-way ANOVA by ranks tests the probability that the k related samples could have come from the same population with respect the mean rankings. • The Cochran Q test (nominal data)

  17. The Case of k Independent Samples • The Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA by ranks tests tha null hypothesis that the k samples come from the same population or from identical populations with the same median • The Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA by ranks requires at ordinal measurement of the variable • The Chi-square test (nominal data) and the Median test (ordinal data)

  18. Choice of Statistical Tests

  19. Reference • Siegel, Sidney & Castellan, N. John, Jr (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.