1 / 20

OPTIMUM POWER ALLOCATION FOR PARALLEL GAUSSIAN CHANNELS WITH ARBITRARY INPUTS DISTRIBUTION

OPTIMUM POWER ALLOCATION FOR PARALLEL GAUSSIAN CHANNELS WITH ARBITRARY INPUTS DISTRIBUTION BY: ORAI COKER. Outline. Introduction Problem formulation Optimum Power Allocation policy Waterfilling Policy-Gaussian Inputs Graphical Interpretations: MMSE Power Charts

kathier
Download Presentation

OPTIMUM POWER ALLOCATION FOR PARALLEL GAUSSIAN CHANNELS WITH ARBITRARY INPUTS DISTRIBUTION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. OPTIMUM POWER ALLOCATION FOR PARALLEL GAUSSIAN CHANNELS WITH ARBITRARY INPUTS DISTRIBUTION BY: ORAI COKER

  2. Outline • Introduction • Problem formulation • Optimum Power Allocation policy • Waterfilling Policy-Gaussian Inputs • Graphical Interpretations: MMSE Power Charts • Graphical Interpretations: Mercury Waterfilling • High power and low Power Regime • Application: DSL • Conclusion

  3. Introduction • For independent parallel Gaussian –noise channels, the mutual information is maximized under an average power Constraint by independent Gaussian inputs. -This power is allocated according to the water filling policy. • In practice, however discrete signaling constellations ( m-PSK, m-QAM, etc.) are the input signals instead of the ideal Gaussian signals. • This project formulates the power allocation policy that maximizes the mutual information over parallel channels with these non-ideal input distributions Graphical Interpretation: Mercury/water filling.

  4. Problem Formulation The Input-Output relationship on the th channel with noise zero-mean unit variance, independent of the noise on the other channels. Power constraint

  5. Problem Formulation (contd.) Introducing for convenience…….. with power allocation constrained by Defining the input-output mutual Information on the channel as: The problem posed is: What is the Power Allocation that maximizes the mutual information with given input distributions while satisfying the power constraint:

  6. Optimum Power Allocation Policy Introducing two very important theorems that are very essential for the determination of this Power Allocation Policy are: Theorem 1: For any distribution of the inputs satisfies: Theorem 2 : The Power Allocation With such that:

  7. Optimum Power Allocation Policy (contd.) From this two theorems the Power to be allocated to each channel can then explicitly be represented as : ……1 Where can be calculated from ……2 as sum of allocated power must be 1; Hence the power allocation boils down to a two-step process: • Solve for in (2 ) • Use to identify using (1 )

  8. Waterfilling Policy-Gaussian Inputs which reduces Theorem 2 to the Waterfilling policy Where plays the role of the water level.

  9. Waterfilling Policy-Gaussian Inputs

  10. Graphical Interpretations: MMSE Power Charts

  11. Graphical Interpretations: MMSE Power Charts (contd)

  12. Graphical Interpretations: MMSE Power Charts (contd.)

  13. Graphical Interpretations: Mercury Waterfilling Let us define, for any arbitrary input distribution: such that, for a Gaussian input, for all . The function enables the interpretation of our power allocation policy, which we refer to as Mercury/Waterfilling.

  14. Graphical Interpretations: Mercury Waterfilling (contd) • For each of the channels, set up a unit-base vessel solid up to a height • Choose . Pour mercury onto each of the vessels until its height reaches .

  15. Graphical Interpretations: Mercury Waterfilling (contd) • Water fill, keeping identical upper level of water in all vessels, • until the water level reaches

  16. Graphical Interpretations: Mercury Waterfilling (contd) • The water height over the mercury on the th vessel • gives .

  17. High power and low Power Regime In Low power Regime: The Waterfilling policy is identical to the optimum Mercury/Waterfilling policy. For Proper complex input distributions ..its the same High Power Regime: In stark contrast with waterfilling: Given equal constellations, the stronger a channel, the less power it is allocated.

  18. Application: DSL • The smaller the constellation, the higher the excess power at all values of P . • Regardless of the constellation, the excess power vanishes for small P • For large P, high excess powers

  19. Conclusion • The relationship between the nonlinear MMSE an the mutual information is used in formulating the power allocation policy for independent Gaussian-noise channels driven by arbitrary (not necessarily identical) input constellations. • Mercury/Waterfilling, is a geometric representation of the optimum policy that generalizes the classical solution for ideal Gaussian inputs. • As long as the input constellations are proper complex they are almost as good as Gaussian inputs in the low-power region and thus, Waterfilling is almost optimum for proper complex inputs in that region. • In the moderate-to-high power regions, the principle that stronger channels should be allocated more power, may not hold with constellations of practical interest. In fact, in some circumstances, the Mercury/Waterfilling policy mandates exactly the opposite.

  20. Questions?

More Related