1 / 11

Reminder: The matrix

AEROVET - Recognition & Validation Annie Bouder, Cereq, Marseille FR Andreas Saniter, ITB, Uni HB GE. Reminder: The matrix. Reminder: Assessment. qualitative-performance-oriented The person in charge estimates whether the apprentice has the respective Mobility Unit (MU).

kathie
Download Presentation

Reminder: The matrix

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AEROVET - Recognition & ValidationAnnie Bouder, Cereq, Marseille FRAndreas Saniter, ITB, Uni HB GE

  2. Reminder: The matrix

  3. Reminder: Assessment qualitative-performance-oriented The person in charge estimates whether the apprentice has the respective Mobility Unit (MU).

  4. Recognition & Validation within the project (as training units) • Each MU of a chosen unit is a necessary but not sufficient contribution on apprentices’ way to a competent worker – even more important than the parts is the ability to combine these parts contextualised. • The sheet should not be used as a checklist. • Transcript of records of the LO related to the performed MU. • Validation by a kind of evaluation task: • TPT 14: The trainee is working on the whole process of passing bunched circuits, with special respect to the interfaces. • The whole process should be under surveillance of the trainer/teacher and/or an expert-worker. • Recognition: When successful, a certificate is delivered (MaMo).

  5. Recognition & Validation as part of the qualification(as occupational units) • High overlapping not only in work but also in apprenticeship between Germany, France and UK • => Good preconditions for recognising Learning Outcomes in the respective qualifications • Poor overlapping with the Spanish EQF level 5 "HIGHER TECHNICIAN FOR AEROMECHANIC MAINTENANCE" • => Learning Outcomes acquired in other countries should be certified separately, e. g. as in-house certificates

  6. Recognition & Validation as part of the qualification(as occupational units) France: very first steps towards designing the general conditions allowing for compatibility between present regulations and ECVET specifications (pilot project) But: Main reticence is about considering that accumulated pieces of competences could lead to a qualification. Trying to find a compatible solution. - French units are terminal certification units and not progressive learning units (compensation system, acting and reacting capacity); • The main impact of ECVET would be at the level of the regulation for the delivery of diplomas; • A possible solution in a recent evaluation method introduced for the Bac Pros (the CCF – Control during Training) • In the aeronautic sector no attempt up to now, at system level. The Lycée’s initiative

  7. Recognition & Validation as part of the qualification(as occupational units) Spain: No realistic recognition within the higher technician (Maintenance) But: Potential of designing a qualification in aircraft production. Actually: No qualification. Airbus Spain is on the one side not really interested in designing a qualification (the way they hire their workforce is quite cheap) But: On the other side there is an enormous lack of competence, they sent more than 900 workers to Airbus@Bremen within the last 2 years due to the A400M FAL in Seville. The certificates these workers awarded are type-specific.

  8. Recognition & Validation as part of the qualification(as occupational units) UK: Realistic recognition as Aeronautical Engineering Suite 3 Unit No 62: Installing Aircraft Cableforms/Looms But: High preconditions in assessing, 8 requirements, e. g.: 4. Apply five of the following installation methods and techniques: ● soldering ● securing and locking ● loom protection ● earth bonding ● crimping ● wire locking ● taking electrostatic discharge (ESD) precautions ● correct loom/fibre-optic handling ● correct amalgamated loom handling (source:http://www.ukstandards.co.uk/Admin/DB/0045/O45NAE3-062.pdf)

  9. Recognition & Validation as part of the qualification(as occupational units) Germany: Planned recognition as basis for the new profiles in the sector But: Definitely not as occupational units in the understanding of the ECVET-recommendation. Both social partners (BDLI, IG Metall) insist, that • a holistic exam is needed • the tradition of minimum standards (time frame) should be kept • the neo-liberal approach (the apprentice as the designer of his vocational career by collecting his bricks) is misleading.

  10. Draft: the new German occupational group:Aircraft technicians

  11. TheNetwork:

More Related