1 / 48

Modeling Multiple Printed Antennas Embedded in Stratified Uniaxial Anisotropic Dielectrics

Modeling Multiple Printed Antennas Embedded in Stratified Uniaxial Anisotropic Dielectrics. Ph.D. Candidate: Benjamin D. Braaten Electrical and Computer Engineering North Dakota State University February 6 th , 2009. Topics. Introduction The printed antenna. Properties and applications.

katharinec
Download Presentation

Modeling Multiple Printed Antennas Embedded in Stratified Uniaxial Anisotropic Dielectrics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Modeling Multiple Printed Antennas Embedded in Stratified Uniaxial Anisotropic Dielectrics Ph.D. Candidate: Benjamin D. Braaten Electrical and Computer Engineering North Dakota State University February 6th, 2009

  2. Topics • Introduction • The printed antenna. • Properties and applications. • Proposed research • Derivation of the new spectral domain immittance functions. • Solving the new spectral domain immittance functions. • Numerical results and measurements. • Future work. • Conclusion. North Dakota State University

  3. Introduction • In 1953 Deschamps formally introduced the microstrip antenna [1]. • Many uses: • Radar • Cellular comm. • Satellite comm. • Wireless networks • Wireless sensors • Biomedical devices • RFID … [1] G. A. Deschamps, “Microstrip Microwave Antennas,” 3rdUSAF Symposium on Antennas, 1953. North Dakota State University

  4. Introduction • Disadvantages: • Many designs have a narrow bandwidth • Radiate into a half space • Poor endfire radiation • Poor isolation between the feed an radiating elements • Possible surface waves (power loss) • Advantages: • Low profile • Lightweight • Low cost • Able to achieve UWB (in some cases) • Dual frequency capabilities • Simple to fabricate North Dakota State University

  5. Introduction • Region between plates act like the region between a transmission line and a ground plane with both ends open. • Results in a standing wave. • Fringing fields are responsible for radiation. North Dakota State University

  6. Introduction • Properties of interest include: • Input impedance • Current distribution • Radiation patterns • Bandwidth • Feed techniques • Mutual coupling with other elements • Conducting patch layout • … etc. North Dakota State University

  7. Introduction Many different types of layouts exist: [2] [3] [2] Anthony Lai and Tatsou Itoh, “Composite Right/Left Handed Transmission Line Metamaterials,” IEEE Magazine, September 2004. [3] H. Wang, X. B. Huang and D. G. Fang, “A single layer wideband U-slot microstrip patch antenna array,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 7, 2008, pp. 9-12. North Dakota State University

  8. Proposed Research Consider: North Dakota State University

  9. Proposed Research RESEARCH QUESTIONS: What is the input impedance of a driven element in the layered anisotropic structure in the presence of other conducting patches defined on arbitrary anisotropic layers in the same structure? and • What is the mutual impedance between a driven element in the layered anisotropic structure and other conducting patches defined on arbitrary anisotropic layers in the same structure? North Dakota State University

  10. Proposed Research The previous two questions are very significant in many fields. • Microstrip antenna arrays [4]. • Frequency Selective Structures (FSS) [5] • Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) [6] • IC based antennas • Radar … [4] David M. Pozar and Daniel H. Schaubert, “Microstrip Antennas: The analysis and Design of Microstrip Antennas and Arrays”, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 1995. [5]A.L.P.S. Campos an A.G. d'Assuncao, “Scattering paramters of a frequnecy selective surface between anisotropic dielectric layers for incidnet co-polarized plane waves,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 2001, Vol. 4, July 8-13, 2001, p. 382-385. [6]K. Finkenzeller, RFID Handbook:Fundamentals and Applications in Contactless Smart Cards and Identification, John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, England, 2003. North Dakota State University

  11. The new spectral domain immittance functions Start with the following Hertz vector potentials: Electric Hertz potential and Magnetic Hertz potential North Dakota State University

  12. The new spectral domain immittance functions • Next, only the y-direction of the Hertz vector potential is needed. and • This is because the optical axis is in the y-direction and • this component satisfies the higher order TE and TM tangential boundary conditions. North Dakota State University

  13. Numerical results and measurements The TEM, TM and TE modes TEM mode TM and TE modes [9] [9] http://www.ibiblio.org/kuphaldt/electricCircuits/AC/02407.png North Dakota State University

  14. The new spectral domain immittance functions Now define the following expression for the magnetic and electric field: where the Hertzian vector potentials are solutions to the following wave equations: North Dakota State University

  15. The new spectral domain immittance functions and North Dakota State University

  16. The new spectral domain immittance functions To simplify evaluating the previous expressions, we define the following Fourier transform: This results in the following relations: North Dakota State University

  17. The new spectral domain immittance functions This results in the following simplified expressions: where and North Dakota State University

  18. The new spectral domain immittance functions Similarly for and North Dakota State University

  19. The new spectral domain immittance functions Single layer problem North Dakota State University

  20. The new spectral domain immittance functions Single layer problem Now use these expressions to enforce the boundary conditions: North Dakota State University

  21. The new spectral domain immittance functions Single layer problem After extensive factoring and manipulation, the following spectral domain immittance functions are derived: and (typical expression – spectral domain Green’s function) where North Dakota State University

  22. The new spectral domain immittance functions Double (d3 = 0) and Triple layer problems North Dakota State University

  23. The new spectral domain immittance functions Double and Triple layer problems After extensive factoring and manipulation, the following spectral domain immittance functions are derived: and North Dakota State University

  24. Solving the new expressions • The spectral domain moment method was used to solve for the unknown current. • PWS functions were used as expansion and basis functions. • A delta source was used to drive the problem. North Dakota State University

  25. Numerical results and measurements The problem chosen to validate newly derived spectral domain immittance functions was the printed dipole. North Dakota State University

  26. Numerical results and measurements The first step was to validate the numerical results with experimental measurements. • Radius a = 0.4 mm • Length L = 60 mm • FR-4: εr = 4.35 • Printed strip W = 4a North Dakota State University

  27. Numerical results and measurements Picture of measured monopole. North Dakota State University

  28. This resulted in the following measured resonant frequencies:(Epsilam-10: and , Rogers 5880: ) Numerical results and measurements North Dakota State University

  29. Numerical results and measurements Single layer results North Dakota State University

  30. Numerical results and measurements Single layer results L = 15 mm W = 0.5 mm d1 = 1.58 mm Notice the y- component has the most effect on the resonant frequency (TM0 mode). North Dakota State University

  31. Numerical results and measurements Single layer results The TEM, TM and TE mode reminder A quick illustration of the TM0 mode. TM and TE modes [9] [9] http://www.ibiblio.org/kuphaldt/electricCircuits/AC/02407.png North Dakota State University

  32. Numerical results and measurements Single layer results North Dakota State University

  33. Numerical results and measurements Single layer results North Dakota State University

  34. Numerical results and measurements Single layer results L = 15 mm W = 0.5 mm f = 500 MHz d1 = 1.58 mm Notice:TM0 has the most effect (i.e. y-compontent of the permittivity North Dakota State University

  35. Numerical results and measurements Double layer results North Dakota State University

  36. Numerical results and measurements Double layer results L = 15 mm W = 0.5 mm d1 = 1.58 mm d2 = 1.58 mm ε1= 2.55 Notice: εx2affects the resonant frequency the most. North Dakota State University

  37. Numerical results and measurements Double layer results The field lines: North Dakota State University

  38. Numerical results and measurements Double layer results L = 15 mm W =0 .5 mm d1 = 1.58 mm ε1= 2.55 region 2: anisotropic North Dakota State University

  39. Numerical results and measurements Double layer results L = 15 mm W = 0.5 mm f = 500 MHz d1 = 1.58 mm d2 = 1.58 mm ε1= 3.25. North Dakota State University

  40. Numerical results and measurements Double layer results (Single layer results) North Dakota State University

  41. Numerical results and measurements Double layer results L = 15 mm W = 0.5 mm f = 500 MHz d1 = 1.58 mm d2 = 1.58 mm ε1= 3.25. North Dakota State University

  42. Numerical results and measurements Double layer results North Dakota State University

  43. Numerical results and measurements Triple layer results L = 15 mm W = 0.5 mm f = 500 MHz d1 = 1.58 mm d2 = 1.58 mm d3 = 1.58 mm ε1= ε2= 3.25. North Dakota State University

  44. Numerical results and measurements Triple layer results (Double layer results) North Dakota State University

  45. Conclusion • New spectral domain immittance functions have been derived. • The new spectral domain immittance functions have been validated with measurements, published literature and commercial software. • One, two and three layer problems have been investigated. North Dakota State University

  46. Conclusion • The following has been shown: • The permittivity in the direction of the optical axis below the printed dipole has the most impact on the resonant frequency. • The layer thickness values eventually have little effect on the resonant frequency. • The permittivity in the direction of the optical axis above printed dipoles has little or no effect on the mutual coupling. • The permittivity in the direction orthogonal to the optical axis in the layers above the dipoles can be used to control the mutual coupling. North Dakota State University

  47. Conclusion • Future work • Investigate coupling between rectangular microstrip antennas in layered anisotropic diel. • Investigate coupling between UWB antennas in layered anisotropic diel. • Investigate how anisotropic materials could be used to control coupling between RFID tags • IC based antennas • Metamaterial based designs • Mathematical aspects • poles • surface wave modes • convergence North Dakota State University

  48. Questions Thank you for listening North Dakota State University

More Related