1 / 7

Team 1 - Proposal

This proposal outlines the roles of team members, project type, scenarios, units of comparison, and resources to be used in the asset allocation project for technical decision making.

kater
Download Presentation

Team 1 - Proposal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EGR 403 – Asset Allocation in Technical Decision Making Team 1 - Proposal

  2. Introduction • Team member roles • Type of project • Scenarios • Units of comparison • Resources to be used EGR 403 – Asset Allocation in Technical Decision Making

  3. Team Member Roles • Leongkiat Lee – Summarizer • Brad Roush – Organizer • Brian Swager – Techie EGR 403 – Asset Allocation in Technical Decision Making

  4. Type of Project • Equipment Comparison - Make the decision between the purchase of two different pieces of equipment based on financial benefits and overall technological worth. EGR 403 – Asset Allocation in Technical Decision Making

  5. The Scenarios • Buy a 2005 Honda Civic • Buy a 1985 Honda Civic • Own for 3 years EGR 403 – Asset Allocation in Technical Decision Making

  6. Units of Comparison • Vehicle cost • Engine type • Fuel economy • Insurance costs • Maintenance costs • Depreciation rate EGR 403 – Asset Allocation in Technical Decision Making

  7. Resources To Be Used • Internet • Kelly Bluebook • Honda • Other technical web sources • Library • Pennysaver Magazine EGR 403 – Asset Allocation in Technical Decision Making

More Related