1 / 19

Evidence Based Initiatives: Using Data Systems to Improve Education Processes and Outcomes

Evidence Based Initiatives: Using Data Systems to Improve Education Processes and Outcomes. Matt Dawson Director, REL Midwest August 2009. Overview. View from the Top (Down) Exploring the Possibilities Learning Point Associates SEC Projects.

Download Presentation

Evidence Based Initiatives: Using Data Systems to Improve Education Processes and Outcomes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evidence Based Initiatives: Using Data Systems to Improve Education Processes and Outcomes Matt Dawson Director, REL Midwest August 2009

  2. Overview • View from the Top (Down) • Exploring the Possibilities • Learning Point Associates SEC Projects

  3. “Supposing is good, but finding out is better.” (Mark Twain)

  4. State Level Efforts • “Getting the Evidence for Evidence-Based Initiatives” • Available at: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/midwest/pdf/REL_2007016.pdf

  5. DQC Essential Elements

  6. Exemplary Practices • Establishing LDS using unique student ID • Linking data across the system • Developing diagnostics • Using accountability data

  7. Challenges and Constraints • Analytic capacity, staff, and resources • Data burden • FERPA

  8. Beyond Accountability: An Example where Di = number of FTE teachers needed to meet requirements in a subject area a = proportion of years that the student body is required to take in a given subject xi = average student enrollment in a given school y = class size z = number of periods taught per FTE per day

  9. District Level Needs Sensing • Survey of principals and teachers • More time to use data • More training to interpret test scores • More systematic and relevant information • Training on putting what is learned into practice • Training on working with the data being collected

  10. District Focus Group Findings • Almost all districts use state assessment data • Few find it useful • Few can link state and district data • Lack of consistency between systems • Few have qualified personnel to make data available and understandable

  11. District Focus Group Findings • Interested in tracking academic growth over time • Interested in measuring teacher value-add • Need easy to understand tools and reports • Data should meet the needs of various audiences • Data should be linked to strategies for improvement

  12. How is your district different?

  13. Questions for Districts (and States) • What is the goal? • How will the goal be reached? • Why is that the way to reach the goal?

  14. Reading the Tea Leaves • Secretary Duncan • John Easton • ARRA

  15. ARRA

  16. ARRA

  17. Examples of SEC work by LPA • NY: SEC as part of district audit process • DE: State level project analyzing alignment to standards • OH: Actively working with Ohio for last 5 years • MI: Building capacity for future work • IN: Primarily with districts in corrective action

  18. Questions?

  19. Matt Dawson P: 630-649-6563 F: 630-649-6700 E-Mail: matt.dawson@learningpt.org 1120 East Diehl Road, Suite 200 Naperville, IL 60563-1486 General Information:800-356-2735

More Related