1 / 32

The Corps and Environmental Regulation

The Corps and Environmental Regulation. Presented by Clarissa J Cook. In the Beginning…. June 16, 1775 – Continental Congress created an army with a chief engineer (Colonel Richard Gridley) and 2 assistants

karim
Download Presentation

The Corps and Environmental Regulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Corps and Environmental Regulation Presented by Clarissa J Cook

  2. In the Beginning… • June 16, 1775 – Continental Congress created an army with a chief engineer (Colonel Richard Gridley) and 2 assistants • 1779 – Corp of Engineers reorganized, only to be mustered out of service after Revolutionary War over • 1802 – Permanent and separate US Army Corp of Engineers (USACOE) established at the same time as West Point

  3. West Point Military Academy • West Point’s first superintendent, Jonathan Williams, was chief engineer of Corps • For 1st half of 19th century, WP was the only engineering school in the country

  4. The General Survey Act of 1824 and 1826 • Authorized the President to have surveys done for roads and canals deemed economically or militarily important • Responsibility given to USACOE • 1824 - $75,000 to improve navigation of Ohio and Mississippi rivers • 1826 – established use of authorizations for both surveys and projects (still used)

  5. History • 1879 – Mississippi River Commission • 3 of 7 members from USACOE • Used levees to control flooding in lower Mississippi Valley • 1914 – Panama Canal completed • Officially built by Panama Canal Commission with help from USACOE officers

  6. Headquarters • Headed by the Chief of Engineers • Currently Lieutenant General Carl A. Strock • Advises the US Army on engineering, topography, real estate, etc.

  7. Organization • 8 geographical divisions • Further divided into 41 districts in the US, Asia, and Europe • 9th division created in 2004 for Iraq and Afghanistan • Boundaries defined by watersheds, not state lines • Took watershed approach for better management, planning, and development over larger areas

  8. USACOE Organizations • Huntsville, US Army Engineering and Support Center (CEHNC) • Transatlantic Programs Center (CETAC) • Finance Center, USACE (CEFC) • Humphreys Engineer Center Support Activity (CEHEC) • Marine Design Center (CEMDC) • Institute for Water Resources (IWR) • 249th Engineer Battalion

  9. The Laboratories • Engineer Research and Development Center (CEERD) • Consists of 7 Laboratories • Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory • Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory • Construction Engineering Research Laboratory • Environmental Laboratory • Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory • Information Technology Laboratory • Topographic Engineering Center

  10. CEERD Research • Mapping and terrain analysis • Infrastructure design, construction, operations, and maintenance • Structural engineering • Cold regions and ice engineering • Coastal and hydraulic engineering • Geotechnical engineering • High performance computing and information technology

  11. Mission and Goals • Planning, designing, building, and operating water resources • Design, construct, and manage military facilities for the Army and Air Force • Provide support to other defense and federal agencies by providing designs and construction management

  12. Environmental Missions • Wetlands and waterways regulation and permitting • Authority over dredging and filling • Determine which areas need protection as wetlands • Ecosystem restoration • Re-establish natural, functioning, and self-regulating systems • Florida Everglades largest such attempt

  13. Environmental Missions Cont. • Environmental Stewardship • Management and project programs that comply to Federal, state, and local requirements • Radioactive site cleanup • Formerly under the jurisdiction of Dept. of Energy • Support to EPA Superfund program • Corps manages design and construction contracts for remediation • Provides technical support

  14. Environmental Legislation • The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1890 and 1899 • Aims to prevent unauthorized alteration of navigable waters • Section 10 enforced most and concerns anything that effects the course, location, condition, or capacity of those waters • National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 • Assures all branches of government consider environment before taking any major federal action

  15. Legislation Cont. • Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 • Commonly known as Clean Water Act • Regulates discharges of pollutants into waters • Under jurisdiction of both EPA and USACOE • Water Resources Development Act of 1986 • Nonfederal interests should have more management and financial responsibility concerning water resources • 1990 amendment created goal of “no net loss” of wetlands to increase their quality and quantity

  16. National Wetlands Mitigation Action Plan • Regulatory program administers and enforces Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act • Section 10 says that a Corps permit is required to do any work around or in navigable waters • Section 404 states that a Corps permit is required for dredging or filling into waters of the United States

  17. Regulatory Program • Mitigation • Process for permit applications and Corps decisions on projects • In-Lieu Fee option • Pay the value of the wetland instead of creating, restoring, preserving, or enhancing wetlands • Done by most companies • i.e. Wal-Mart

  18. FIGURE 1–1 Area of wetland impacts permitted, mitigation required by the permit, and the anticipated gain in wetland area as a result of permits issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulatory program from 1993 to 2000. 1 hectare = 2.47 miles. SOURCE: Data from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Headquarters, Operations, Construction and Readiness Division.

  19. Regulatory Program • Permit required before work can begin • Standard Permit • Pre-application/application • Public notice and comment • Evaluation, decision, and mitigation • Monitoring and enforcement

  20. Regulatory Program • General Permit • Most common permit, 90% • Issued quickly • Minimal impact on environment • Given on a national, regional, or state level • Letter of Permission • Issued more quickly than Standard Permit, but slower than General Permit • For projects with no controversy and water quality certificates

  21. Regulatory Program • Decision on applications takes an average of 30 days • USACOE makes about 90,000 decisions a year • 2003 – permits affected 23,000 acres of wetland • More than 43,000 restored, created, enhanced, or preserved

  22. 2001 SWANCC Ruling • Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • Restricts Corps regulation to traditionally navigable waters, surface tributaries, and wetlands adjacent to such waters • Renders moot the “Migratory Bird Rule” which extended jurisdiction to intrastate waters • States and tribes now responsible for isolated waters and wetlands

  23. Regulation Enforcement • Violation of permit usually involves unauthorized filling of wetland or the blocking/altering of waters of the US • Sometimes detected by Corps, but rely on individuals or local, state, and other federal agencies

  24. Regulatory Violations • Corps sends a warning letter if work completed • If work ongoing, violator sent a cease and desist order • Some choose to remove fill and restore cite • Violator can apply for after-the-fact permit

  25. Civil Penalties • Clean Water Act states a civil penalty should not exceed $25,000 a day • Enforced by EPA and USACOE • All monies collected from fines goes directly to US Fish and Wildlife Service • Use the money for wetland projects near the site of the violation

  26. Regulatory Problems • Mitigation plans vague on wetland requirements • Didn’t specify water source, water quantity, soil, topography, structure, and location • Animal habitat not usually considered unless the species are endangered or waterfowl • Numerous studies show as much as 34% of wetlands never installed

  27. Regulatory Problems • Compliance inspections rarely done by USACOE • Workload of USACOE staff is extremely high • Led to making permits a priority, and inspections and site visits became secondary • Rely on other agencies and citizens to call in violations

  28. Regulatory Numbers for 2003 • Standard and Letter Permits: 7,075 denied: 299 • Regional Permits: 43,486 • Nationwide Permits: 35,317 • Acres of wetlands with permitted activity: 21,330 • Acres requiring mitigation: 43,379 • Acres wetland loss avoided through process: 5,824

  29. Questions?

More Related