1 / 9

EMWDA Working Group on Meta-models for Existing Languages

EMWDA Working Group on Meta-models for Existing Languages. I ssue. Is it useful and/or desirable to define meta-models (potentially MOF-Based) for existing formal languages? For example SDL, MSC or VHDL. Or Ada, Java, C++. P eople Attending. Rasmus Fogh Girish Maskeri Laurie Tratt

kaoru
Download Presentation

EMWDA Working Group on Meta-models for Existing Languages

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EMWDA Working Group on Meta-models for Existing Languages

  2. Issue • Is it useful and/or desirable to define meta-models (potentially MOF-Based) for existing formal languages? For example SDL, MSC or VHDL. Or Ada, Java, C++.

  3. People Attending • Rasmus Fogh • Girish Maskeri • Laurie Tratt • Salim Bouzitouna • Zhen Ru Dai • Aris Georgalas • Anastasius Gavras • Jan Aagedal

  4. Solution • Is it useful? Yes. • data models or semantically-rich models? • semantics often already externally defined, but sometimes one needs semantics to exchange models

  5. Advantages of the solution • What to do with such instances of such meta-models? • Map to other models • Analysis of models • Simulation • Common representation • Tool integration and reuse • Easier to define the semantics of a new language in a meta-model than in traditional ways • Can get a graphical representation of the language

  6. Disadvantages of the solution • Redo everything done before? • Existing tools, e.g. for Z, are already quite advanced (refinement techniques, model checking) • Textual representations can be useful

  7. To Be Done • Find existing work on this in other communities • STEP/EXPRESS? • System Engineering? • SDL? MSC? (Humboldt University) • TTCN (Fraunhofer FOKUS)

  8. Roadmap for the solution • The other communities should pick up on this... • A methodology for how to take BNF to become a meta-model

  9. Related Issues • Read the book at www.xactium.com on how to do meta-modelling

More Related