1 / 13

Student Representation

Student Representation. September 2013. Professor Patricia Price PVC: Student Experience and Academic Standards Cardiff University. Overview. What is Institutional Review (IR)? How are students involved? Chapter 5 QA Code Student Representation Q&A.

kalyca
Download Presentation

Student Representation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Student Representation September 2013 Professor Patricia Price PVC: Student Experience and Academic Standards Cardiff University

  2. Overview • What is Institutional Review (IR)? • How are students involved? • Chapter 5 QA Code • Student Representation • Q&A

  3. Safeguarding standards and improving the quality of UK higher education “Institutional Review is the review method for higher education institutions in Wales. It is used to check how effectively institutions manage the quality and standards of their academic provision.” Week of 31 MARCH 2014 3-5 days

  4. How Judged? IR (Wales) – differs slightly • Cardiff University’s threshold standards • Are the awards and qualifications from Cardiff University of an academic standard consistent with Framework for Higher Education Qualifications? • Meets UK expectations/does not meet UK expectations • The quality of the students’ learning opportunities • The quality of public information (new category) • The institution’s strategy to enhance students’ learning opportunities • Commended/ meets UK expectations/ requires improvements/ does not meet UK expectations

  5. Why is IR important to the University?

  6. Chapter B5: Student engagement June 2012 Student engagement (page 2): • improving the motivation of students to engage in learning and to learn independently (Chapter 3) • the participation of students in quality enhancement and quality assurance processes, resulting in the improvement of their educational experience (Chapter 5). Student Involvement: • Visiting panel • Student Submission • Student interviews

  7. Areas of ‘partnership’ • application and admission • induction and transition into higher education • programme and curriculum design, delivery and organisation • curriculum content • teaching delivery • learning opportunities • learning resources • student support and guidance • assessment “All students should have the opportunity to be involved in quality enhancement and assurance processes in a manner and at a level appropriate to them“ (page 3).

  8. Expectation Higher education providers take deliberate steps to engage all students, individually and collectively, as partners in the assurance and enhancement of their educational experience.

  9. Indicators Indicator 1 • Higher education providers, in partnership with their student body, define and promote the range of opportunities for any student to engage in educational enhancement and quality assurance. Indicator 2 • Higher education providers create and maintain an environment within which students and staff engage in discussions that aim to bring about demonstrable enhancement of the educational experience. Indicator 3 • Arrangements exist for the effective representation of the collective student voice at all organisational levels, and these arrangements provide opportunities for all students to be heard.

  10. Indicators Indicator 4 • Higher education providers ensure that student representatives and staff have access to training and ongoing support to equip them to fulfil their roles in educational enhancement and quality assurance effectively. Indicator 5 • Students and staff engage in evidence-based discussions based on the mutual sharing of information. Indicator 6 • Staff and students to disseminate and jointly recognise the enhancements made to the student educational experience, and the efforts of students in achieving these successes. Indicator 7 • The effectiveness of student engagement is monitored and reviewed at least annually, using pre-defined key performance indicators, and policies and processes enhanced where required.

  11. N.B. • Our Student Representative should be trained – Bethan! • Please note: deadlines for the names of School Chairs College Forums. • Minutes of Student-Staff Panels Bethan WHY? • monitor any significant University wide issues • help the elected officers to be more informed in meetings

  12. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? pricepe@cardiff.ac.uk

More Related