1 / 18

Storage Innovator Awards

Storage Innovator Awards. Paul Gillin, TechTarget Patrick Eitenbichler, Hewlett-Packard Sponsored by. How HP Solved KinderCare Learning Center’s Storage Problem. Leslie O’Donnell Senior Director, Systems Engineering KinderCare Information Systems. Corporate Relocation Challenge.

kaili
Download Presentation

Storage Innovator Awards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Storage Innovator Awards Paul Gillin, TechTarget Patrick Eitenbichler, Hewlett-Packard Sponsored by

  2. How HP Solved KinderCare Learning Center’s Storage Problem Leslie O’Donnell Senior Director, Systems Engineering KinderCare Information Systems

  3. Corporate Relocation Challenge • Technology is Outdated • HP T500 10 way Database Server • HP G70 Application Server • JBOD with Software Mirroring and Striping • Compressed Maintenance Window • KinderCare relocated it’s corporate office from Montgomery, Alabama to Portland, Oregon. Due to the time change, the window during which maintenance could be performed was condensed considerably. KinderCare needed equipment and software that could assist with this change in operation.

  4. Challenges (Cont..) • The network was converted from dial-up to continually connected frame relay. • Intranet e-mail was established for the entire corporation. • Limited Scalability • With the addition of frame relay and intranet accessibility, KinderCare needed to effectively accommodate a larger volume of concurrent users. • All data required 100% back-up on a nightly basis. • All data required replication for development and testing purposes.

  5. Corporate Relocation Selection Process • KinderCare considered using several different vendors to accomplish our goal of a successful and seamless move. HP was our primary vendor and exhibited the ability to maintain the entire hardware and software solution. This would eliminate the need for multiple vendors and integration problems, and thereby decrease the time spent by KinderCare staff to resolve issues.

  6. Corporate Relocation Solutions • Update Technology • Addition of HP N4000 database server • Addition of HP K570 application server • HPUX 10.X and up • Addition of HP SureStore disk array XP256 • Reduce Maintenance Process • HP SureStore E business copy XP software • HP DLT library • Easily Accommodate Increased User Volume • Upgrade path to Superdome and XP512 to manage increased number of applications and users.

  7. End Result • Business Copy • Created reporting database • Reproduced testing and development system • Created offline backup system • XP256 • Eliminated disk bottlenecks • Gained significant performance improvement • Reduced complexity of disk management • Increased flexibility to add capacity

  8. Payback • Data migrations and software upgrade times were significantly diminished. • KinderCare systems administration department was able to manage 1,200 field locations with a staff of only five personnel.

  9. The judges Storage Innovator Awards Jim Booth, engagement manager, GiantLoop Networks John Blackman, systems architect, Wells Fargo Marc Staimer, president, Dragon Slayer Consulting Michele Hope, site editor, SearchStorage.com Mark Schlack, editor in chief, Storage magazine Paul Gillin, VP, editorial, TechTarget, Inc.

  10. Category: Asset Utilization Storage Innovator Awards Rohm and Haas

  11. Highlights Storage Innovator Awards • Increased Windows NT storage utilization levels from 30 percent to nearly 100 percent • Move to a SAN eliminated 75 servers; caused a 20 percent reduction in their NT environment • Accomplished server consolidation/server elimination while data needs were growing • Used diverse software and storage components creatively to maximize efficiency of their systems • Exhibited great use of backup/recovery tools and both block- and file-level data transmission over the network

  12. The judges said… Storage Innovator Awards “Rohm and Haas clearly demonstrated that IT departments can both maximize existing storage resources AND reduce overall IT costs –- all while meeting their company’s growing data storage needs. While most companies seem satisfied with maintaining the status quo of their servers, this company actively sought to reduce its volume of servers in use. The company’s move to a SAN proved an integral part of its consolidation efforts.”

  13. Category: Total Cost of Ownership Storage Innovator Awards BlueCross BlueShield Of Tennessee

  14. Highlights Storage Innovator Awards • Fragmented storage, skyrocketing data growth led to decision to implement a SAN • Storage requirements have grown 90-fold in six years with zero increase in staff • Saved $120,000/mo. from month one. • Manage 46TB of data with four p/t administrators • Zero SAN downtime, much improved visibility into storage fabric • SAN has enabled large-scale server consolidation

  15. The judges said… Storage Innovator Awards “BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee exemplified innovation by completely overhauling its IT architecture over the last several years. Fundamental to its recent IT initiatives was the installation of a SAN, which permitted huge growth in data volumes with little added cost. The company’s documented cost savings are impressive, as is its potential to handle future growth through expansion of the SAN.”

  16. Category: Total Cost of Ownership Storage Innovator Awards Grant Thornton, LLP

  17. Highlights Storage Innovator Awards • Ran 44 Exchange servers and seven SQL databases, all with locally-attached storage. • Architectural limitations inhibited storage growth plans. • Consolidated onto four Exchange servers, single database with SAN underpinning. • Database administration dramatically reduced, downtime cut, backups trimmed from 32 hours to four. • $850,000 yearly savings through consolidation; disk savings of $150,000 year one.

  18. The judges said… Storage Innovator Awards “Grant Thornton’s story demonstrates the cost-saving benefits of consolidation. The company undertook an ambitious project to combine mail and database servers while simultaneously moving to a SAN. Adoption of networked storage enabled many of the infrastructure changes to happen and enabled Grant Thornton to save millions of dollars. The company is well positioned to take advantage of further consolidation benefits.”

More Related