1 / 25

NEESR-SG: Controlled Rocking of Steel-Framed Buildings with Replaceable Energy Dissipating Fuses

NEESR-SG: Controlled Rocking of Steel-Framed Buildings with Replaceable Energy Dissipating Fuses. Greg Deierlein, Paul Cordova, Eric Borchers, Xiang Ma, Sarah Billington, & Helmut Krawinkler, Stanford University Jerome Hajjar & Kerry Hall, University of Illinois

justus
Download Presentation

NEESR-SG: Controlled Rocking of Steel-Framed Buildings with Replaceable Energy Dissipating Fuses

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NEESR-SG: Controlled Rocking of Steel-Framed Buildings with Replaceable Energy Dissipating Fuses Greg Deierlein, Paul Cordova, Eric Borchers, Xiang Ma, Sarah Billington, & Helmut Krawinkler, Stanford University Jerome Hajjar & Kerry Hall, University of Illinois Mitsumasa Midorikawa, Hokkaido University David Mar, Tipping & Mar Associates

  2. Shortcomings of Current Approaches Throw-away technology: Structure and Architecture absorbs energy through damage Large Inter-story Drifts: Result in architectural & structural damage High Accelerations: Result in content damage & loss of function Deformed Section – Eccentric Braced Frame

  3. Objective Develop a new structural building system that employs self-centering rocking action and replaceable* fuses to provide safe and cost effective earthquake resistance. *Key Concept – design for repair

  4. Leveraging previous research … • Self-Centering Concepts • rocking frame/wall systems • post-tensioned frames • Energy Dissipating Shear Panels • ductile fiber cementitous composites • slit steel shear walls • Performance-Based Engineering (PEER/ATC) • damage & collapse limit states • economic losses & life-cycle assessment • simulation tools

  5. Scope • System Design Development - parametric design studies - shear panel fuse design and testing - building simulation studies • Subassembly Frame/Fuse Tests - quasi-static cyclic loading - PT rocking frame details & response - panel/frame interaction - model calibration • Shake Table System Tests - proof-of-concept - validation of simulation models Stanford NEES - Illinois E-Defense

  6. Replaceable Fuse Pivoting Fuse Braced Frames D H A B A Shear Strains = D/H x A/B

  7. Combined Pivoting Fuse Base Shear MRF Drift Pivoting Fuse System with Backup MRF • Elastic restoring force • Reduce damage in fuse • Reduce residual deformations • Provides redundancy Moment Resisting Frames

  8. “Rocking” Braced Frames No Permanent Displacement Force Gravity load overturning resistance Displacement Midorikawa, M., Azuhata, T., Ishihara, T. and Wada, A. (2003)

  9. Rocking Braced Frame w/Post Tensioning Orinda City Offices Architect:Siegel and Strain Architects

  10. Controlled Rocking Braced Frame with Fuses Yielding of Structural Fuse Structural Fuse Post-tensioning (PT) Tendons PT Cables & Braces remain elastic Steel Braced Frame Could potentially employ additional fuse at base of column A B A

  11. Pretension/Brace System Fuse System c b c d e b Base Shear a,f Base Shear Fuse Strength Eff. Fuse Stiffness a d PT Strength g Drift Frame Stiffness g f e Drift b c Origin-a – frame strain + small distortions in fuse a – frame lift off, elongation of PT b – fuse yield (+) c – load reversal d – zero force in fuse e – fuse yield (-) f – frame contact f-g – frame relaxation g – strain energy left in frame and fuse, small residual displacement Base Shear 2x Fuse Strength d a PT Strength e f PT – Fuse Strength g Drift Combined System

  12. Energy Dissipating Fuse Options • Attributes of Fuse • high initial stiffness • large strain capacity • hysteretic energy dissipation • Candidate Fuse Materials & Designs • ductile fiber cementitious composites** • steel panels with slits** • low-yield steel • mixed sandwich panels

  13. Ductile Fiber Reinforced Cemetitious Panels • Tapered Flexural/Shear Links • Designed for distributed plasticity • Similar in concept to a “butterfly” link beam HPFRCC Flexural Panel Tests by Kesner & Billington 2005

  14. Steel Shear Wall with Slits Hitaka et al., 2004

  15. OpenSees Simulation Model Nonlinear Truss Members Elastic Truss Members EPP Post-Tensioning Tendons Uplift Spring

  16. PT Yielding RDR = 3% Global Behavior A A B Cyclic Response 4% shear strain cap PD Fuse Behavior DESIGN with R = 8.0 Vd = 0.125W PT = 1055kN, Vp,fuse = 1687kN br = 1.0 Pinching 50% residual

  17. Bilinear vs. Pinching Fuse Not Restoring Restoring PT Strength = Fuse Strength (2PT*A) / (Vp,fuse (A+B)) = 1.0

  18. Maximum Interstory Drift vs. Sa(T1) 2.7% 2/50 Level • Inelastic Time History Analyses: • 20 EQ record pairs, scaled to increasing intensities • Primary EDP: interstory drift • structural limit states • - column lift-off (rocking) • fuse yielding/damage • PT yielding 1.6% 10/50 Level PT Yielding Unscaled records The yellow squares represent the median, 16th and 84th percentile response.

  19. Subassembly Frame Tests (NEES-Illinois) • Test Configuration • 2/3 scale planar rocking frame with realistic details • quasi-static • System Response • structural details & PT • various fuse types • indeterminate shear-fuse/frame interaction • Simulation model validation NEES - Illinois

  20. Shake Table Validation Test (E-Defense) • Large-scale frame assembly • Validation of dynamic response and simulation • Proof-of-Concept • construction details • re-centering behavior • fuse replacement • Collaboration & Payload Projects

  21. shaking direction E-Defense Testbed Structure Section Plan View E-Defense

  22. Collaboration Opportunities • Alternative Fuse Designs • Alternative Rocking Systems • rocking column base details • hydraulically actuated self-centering • Industrial Collaboration • Steel manufacturers/fabricators • Design practitioners • Related Japanese “Steel Project” • Related US Initiatives • PEER Building Benchmarking • ATC 58 & 63

  23. Seismic & Green Design Rocking Frame Design Decision Matrix

  24. Life-cycle Financial Assessment

More Related