1 / 29

Common Core State Standards CCSS

Common Core State Standards CCSS. Presentation Objectives . TLW: understand the development process and design of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) become familiar with the ELA components of the CCSS become familiar with the Math components of the CCSS

justis
Download Presentation

Common Core State Standards CCSS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Common CoreState StandardsCCSS

  2. Presentation Objectives • TLW: • understand the development process and design of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) • become familiar with the ELA components of the CCSS • become familiar with the Math components of the CCSS • understand the CCSS assessment development and timeline for implementation • be able to locate CCSS website resources • discuss and develop an implementation plan for the CCSS at the building level

  3. CCSS Development • The Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI), coordinated by the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), committed to developing a common core of state K-12 English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics standards. • 48 states supported the concept • 40 states have officially adopted them • External and state feedback teams provided on-going feedback to writing teams throughout the process • Revisions made in response to feedback • Final standards released June 2, 2010 • Michigan State Board of Education adopted in June 15, 2010

  4. CCSS are: • Aligned with college and work expectations • Internationally benchmarked so that all students are prepared to succeed in our global economy and society • Build upon strengths and lessons of current state standards • Based on evidence and research • Robust and relevant to the real world • Focused and coherent • Fewer, clearer, and higher standards (???)

  5. The Common Core State Standards do NOT define: • How teachers should teach • All that can or should be taught • The nature of advanced work beyond the core • The interventions needed for students well below grade level • The full range of support for English Language Learners and students with special needs • The assessment framework

  6. Along with CCSS, • • Educators must be given resources, tools, and time to adjust classroom practice. • • Instructional materials needed that align to the standards. • • Assessments must be developed to measure student progress. • • Federal, state, and district policies will need to be reexamined to ensure they support alignment of the common core state standards with student achievement.

  7. Design and Organization Cluster • Content standards define what students should understand and be able to do • Clusters are groups of related standards • Domains are larger groups that progress across grades Domain Standard

  8. Common CoreState StandardsCCSS - Math

  9. Design and Organization Eight Mathematical Practices • Carry across all grade levels • Describe habits of mind of a mathematically expert student

  10. CCSS - Eight Standards for Mathematical Practice • 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. • 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. • 3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. • 4. Model with mathematics. • 5. Use appropriate tools strategically. • 6. Attend to precision. • 7. Look for and make use of structure. • 8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.

  11. Design and Organization State Standards for Mathematical Content • K-8 standards presented by grade level • Posters available • At http://store.kressdesign2.com/ • Address label stickers • At http://www.mictm.org/

  12. Design and Organization State Standards for Mathematical Content • Organized into domains that progress over several grades

  13. Fractions, Grades 3–6 • 3. Develop an understanding of fractions as numbers. • 4. Extend understanding of fraction equivalence and ordering. • 4. Build fractions from unit fractions by applying and extending previous understandings of operations on whole numbers. • 4. Understand decimal notation for fractions, and compare decimal fractions. • 5. Use equivalent fractions as a strategy to add and subtract fractions. • 5. Apply and extend previous understandings of multiplication and division to multiply and divide fractions. • 6. Apply and extend previous understandings of multiplication and division to divide fractions by fractions.

  14. Design and Organization State Standards for Mathematical Content • Grade introductions give 2–4 focal points at each grade level

  15. Focal points at each grade level

  16. Design and Organization State Standards for Mathematical Content • High school standards presented by conceptual theme

  17. High School Conceptual themes in high school • Number and Quantity • Algebra • Functions • Modeling • Geometry • Statistics and Probability

  18. CCSS and GLCE Comparisons • Two Resources: • Michigan Department of Education • http://michigan.gov/documents/mde/CCS_Math_Alignment_Intro_4-23-10_sc_319725_7.pdf • Michigan Council of Mathematics • Documents are called “Crosswalks” • Long form and short form • http://www.mictm.org/

  19. Common CoreState StandardsCCSS - Assessment

  20. Race to the Top Assessment Competition • Assessment Consortia • Development of an infrastructure and content for a common assessment in measuring CCSS in English Language Arts and Mathematics • Two consortia • SMARTER/Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) • Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Career (PARCC)

  21. Michigan - Smarter BalancedAssessment Consortium (SBAC)

  22. Assessment Update • A new assessment system will be implemented in 2014-2015 and will be based on the work of the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium • This will be a ‘system of formative and summative assessments, organized around Common Core standards, that • support high-quality learning and the demands of accountability • balance concerns for innovative assessment with the need for a fiscally sustainable system that is feasible to implement’

  23. Assessment Prototype • 19 Multiple Choice questions • 3 Constructed Response questions • 18 Technologically Enhanced • 2 Performance Events • Possibly scored by local teachers first

  24. Timeline for transitioning 2010-2011 Getting to know the CCSS/Alignment work 2010 MEAP/2011MME remain the same State focus will be on technical assistance 2011-2012 Implementation of CCSS in classrooms 2011 MEAP/2012 MME remain the same State focus will be on instruction/professional development 2012-2013 2012 MEAP minimally modified as necessary to reflect the CCSS 2013 MME remains the same State focus will be on student learning 2013-2014 2013 MEAP based on 2012 model 2014 MME remains the same State focus will be on preparing for new assessments from SMARTER Consortium 2014-2015 Full implementation: Instruction and assessment based on CCSS

  25. Resources • Michigan Department of Education http://www.michigan.gov/mathematics http://www.michigan.gov/ela • Common Core State Standards Initiative http://www.corestandards.org • Michigan Council of Teachers of Mathematics http://mictm.org • Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability http://www.michigan.gov/oeaa • Summative Multi-state Assessment Resources for Teachers and Educational Researchers http://www.k12.wa.us/SMARTER • Michigan’s Mission Possible http://missionliteracy.com • Website for CCSS posters http://store.kressdesign2.com/

  26. Two words… • Rigor • Relevance

More Related