1 / 41

Media Violence: History, Impact & Policy

Media Violence: History, Impact & Policy. What are the possible effects of watching television?. Your question… Can watching violent content in the media cause real-life aggression? Why or why not? Placing the debate in context…

julius
Download Presentation

Media Violence: History, Impact & Policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Media Violence:History, Impact & Policy

  2. What are the possible effects of watching television? Your question… • Can watching violent content in the media cause real-life aggression? Why or why not? Placing the debate in context… • Media violence is ONE factor that contributes to aggression & violence in society. • What are others?

  3. Placing the debate in context… • Media violence is not the only factor, nor is it most influential…however… • The impact is cumulative. • We have control over it (e.g., NTVS). • Change in mass media content has the potential to influence mass audiences.

  4. Theoretical Perspectives…Why do we think TV has these effects? • Social Learning Theory • Schema or Script Theory • Cultivation Theory • Priming Effects Theory • Desensitization

  5. Media content… Is all violence the same?

  6. National Television Violence Study1996, 1997, 1998 Foundations: • TV violence has harmful effects. • Three effects can occur • Learning attitudes & behaviors • Desensitization • Increased fear • Not all violence poses same degree of risk. • Not all viewers are affected by violence in the same way. Method • Content Analysis – Amount, Nature, Context

  7. Violence sells… Marketing Violent Entertainment to Children Federal Trade Commission Report http://www.ftc.gov

  8. Marketing Violent Entertainment • Impetus • Columbine School Shootings • Overarching Goals • Do industries promote violent content in venues where children and teens comprise a substantial percentage of the audience? • Are these ads intended to attract underage youth?

  9. Marketing Violent Entertainment • Sources of Data • Documentation submitted by industry (60) • Movie Previews • Sound Recordings • Game Demo Disks • Magazine & TV Ads • Confidential discussions w/trade groups • Conversations w/ invested parties • Review of marketing & media plans

  10. Marketing Violent Entertainment Movies rated R for violence (n=44)* • 80% targeted children under 17 yrs • 64% - marketing plans contained express statements that the target audience included children under 17. Music w/ explicit lyrics (n=55) • 73% targeted children under 17 yrs • 27% - marketing plans identified teens Electronic Games w/ M rating (n=118)* • 70% targeted children under 17 yrs • 51% - marketing plans identified teens *Follow-up – movies & games made progress

  11. Television Policy… Television Ratings & the V-Chip: A Family Systems Perspective

  12. The Study of Media Policy from a Systems Perspective Culture History Family Child Politics Economics Regulations

  13. A History of Public Concern… • Decades of research on TV violence • Public organizations take a stance • Telecommunications Act of 1996 • Ratings implemented in 1997 • V-Chip technology rolls out 1999/2000

  14. V-Chip Ratings (TV Parental Guidelines)

  15. The V-Chip Study:We wanted to know… • Access • Must have a new TV set • Information • Must possess awareness & understanding • Impact • Does V-Chip influence viewing? • Does it influence family dynamics? • What factors outside the family shape use?

  16. The Research Approach • Longitudinal field experiment: • Home environment • Collected data about the natural environment • Multiple assessments • Media activity logs • Telephone Interviews • Home Visits • Longitudinal • Followed families over a 1 – year period • Two waves of data collection

  17. Method • Sample • 150 mother-child pairs • Target children 7 – 10 years • Diverse SES backgrounds • Apparatus • V-Chip equipped TVs in homes • Conditions • High Information • Low Information • Control

  18. Did the families “use” the V-Chip? • 49% (n=53) tried the V-Chip • Of those who tried, 17% (n=9) had the V-Chip programmed and engaged at our last home visit

  19. “Use” is a multidimensional concept • Tried and Turned Off • Unlocking too time consuming • Other adult unhappy • Didn’t block enough or too many • Didn’t need it • Parents wanted to watch their shows • Tried and Failed • Perceived as complicated • Missed a step in the program process • Compatibility • Mechanical failure • Tried and Didn’t Know it • Someone else programmed the technology

  20. Reasons for not using the V-Chip

  21. V-Chip “Users” • n=9 families • Distinguishing characteristics • Married • Caucasian • Younger children • Homemaker • Worked less • Higher income • Fewer TVs in child bedrooms • More skill with V-Chip • Greater technical efficacy • Greater concerns about TV

  22. Removing the Technological Obstacle: A Follow-Up • Purpose • What happens when families actually use the V-Chip? • Research method • Home visits to program V-Chip • Focus group discussions • Sample characteristics • 28 families of diverse backgrounds • Past/present users & non-users

  23. Reflections on Use • Mother’s Experiences • Supervision, control & awareness • Multiple TVs in home • Children’s Experiences • Lives relatively unaffected • The Family System • Fathers • Siblings • Family pressures & priorities

  24. The Meaning of the V-Chip within the Family System • Multiple media context of the home • Interdependence of family members • Reframing the message to parents

  25. Implications? • Effectiveness of TV Ratings & V-Chip Technology • Parents as Gatekeepers of Media Content • Public Outreach Efforts • Universal Ratings System

  26. Challenges for Parents: Monitoring the Web • Web is virtually unlimited; • Enormous presence of commercial sites; • Children may know more than parents; • Web filter may be ineffective.

  27. Next week… Identity refers to personality characteristics that define the self by the individual and others. • Consider the following: Can one’s identity be shaped by the media? Under what circumstances might this occur? • Approx. 1 page; email response on 10/8 by noon.

More Related