1 / 36

European Position Paper and Action Plan

European Position Paper and Action Plan. Support Schemes dedicated to Willem and Wim. Content. Position Conclusions Best Practice Report Conclusion 1ste Thematic WG meeting Position Team Proposal Action plan Conclusions Best Practice Report Conclusion 1ste Thematic WG meeting

julian-kline
Download Presentation

European Position Paper and Action Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. European Position Paper and Action Plan Support Schemes dedicated to Willem and Wim PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  2. Content Position • Conclusions Best Practice Report • Conclusion 1ste Thematic WG meeting • Position Team Proposal Action plan • Conclusions Best Practice Report • Conclusion 1ste Thematic WG meeting • Position Team Proposal PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  3. Position: Conclusions Best Practice Report: Feed in tariff – best practices: • Germany: high tariff, decreasing each year, plus long term security • Spain: high tariff, following electricity price developments, plus long term security PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  4. Position: Conclusions Best Practice Report: Feed in tariff – requirements: • differentiation of the tariff: local irradiation, sort of installation • long term security of payment (return on investment) • annual decrease of the tariff, following/forcing reduction of costs PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  5. Position: Conclusions Best Practice Report: Tax incentives – best practices: • France: 40 % tax credit plus 14,1% VAT reduction • Sweden: 70 tax credits (for PV on public buildings) PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  6. Position: Conclusions Best Practice Report: Tax incentives requirements: • the total refunds should be worth the administrative effort • the incentive scheme should be easily accessible • the procedure should be simple and straight forward PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  7. Position: Conclusions Best Practice Report: Tax incentive examples: • VAT reduction, • tax credits, independent of the taxes paid • tax deduction for part of the costs • possibility to move investment tax deduction for • or backward in time reduction of property taxes • no tax on investment profit PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  8. Position: Conclusions Best Practice Report: Other instruments – requirements: • the total refunds should be worth the administrative effort • the incentive scheme should be easily accessible, and the procedure should be simple and straight forward. PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  9. Position: Conclusions Best Practice Report: Other instruments – examples: • direct subsidies in % of project costs • direct subsidies in €/Wp • soft loans, well below the base-interest PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  10. Position: Conclusions 1st Thematic WG Feed in tariff: • feed-in tariff and grid access code are crucial. • the consequences of feed-in tariff and subsidies for final consumers (cost agreement) need to be further elaborated in the rapporteurs' working groups. • feed-in tariff calculation is a complicated exercise. PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  11. Position: Conclusions 1st Thematic WG Feed in tariff: • the reasons why feed-in tariff is the most efficient market mechanism should be explained • the objectives of the feed-in tariff scheme should be defined. • feed-in tariff values should be moderate. PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  12. Position: Conclusions 1st Thematic WG Feed in tariff: • the principle of cost effectiveness has to be followed. • the feed-in tariff scheme should not be modified • the feed-in tariff cost should be passed to the consumers PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  13. Position: Conclusions 1st Thematic WG Tax incentives: • not discussed Other instruments: • not discussed PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  14. Position: Proposal Reasoning: • no contribution from PV in EU in near future: 0,5% by 2010 • large long term market: 20 – 40 % in 2050 PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  15. Position: Proposal Reasoning: • need for preparation of desired long term market • no need for fast development of undesired niche markets PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  16. Position: Proposal Statement: • long term PV market in Northern Europe is building integrated PV • long term markets for Southern Europe are (very) large scale power plants plus building integrated PV PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  17. Position: Proposal Statement: • the support scheme should be independent from the government budget • the support scheme should be controlable (by the government PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  18. Position: Proposal Set – up 1: • a limited feed in tariff for a small market • an additional investment support to attract early adopters and fine-tune market growth PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  19. 1 2 Position: Proposal Set – up 1: combination of feed-in tariff (1) and investment support (2) PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  20. Position: Proposal Set – up 2: • a feed in tariff with a ‘moving cap’:a) annual capb) quotum cap PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  21. Position: Proposal Recommendations for feed-in tariffs: • avoid combinations of high tariffs and caps. • avoid tariffs, that cause unpredictable and uncontrollable market growth. • design a scheme with a differentiated tariff, PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  22. Position: Proposal Recommendations for feed-in tariffs: • calculate tariffs, based on the best (=most cost effective) systems • design a scheme that stimulates or forces prise reductions. • consider net-metering PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  23. Position: Proposal Examples of investment support instruments: • VAT reduction for PV systems • a generic subsidy in Euro/Wp • a tender subsidy for most cost efficient projects • tax deduction possibilities for investments in PV (or other sustainable solutions) PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  24. Position: Proposal Examples of investment support instruments: • tax credits, refunded to the applicant independent of the tax bill • reduction community or real estate tax • refund of real estate costs, when acquired from the community PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  25. Position: Proposal Aspects of investment support instruments: • VAT reduction:- easy to implement- little to no administration- loss of state income (DE 2005: 500 MEuro) PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  26. Position: Proposal Aspects of investment support instruments: • Euro / Wp subsidy:- requires government budget- requires separate administration PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  27. Position: Proposal Aspects of investment support instruments: • Tender:- requires government budget- requires separate administration- more appropriate for demo - phase PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  28. Position: Proposal Aspects of investment support instruments: • Tax deduction:- easy to implement- little to no administration- loss of state income- income dependent PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  29. Position: Proposal Aspects of investment support instruments: • Tax credits:- easy to implement- little to no administration- loss of state income PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  30. Position: Proposal Aspects of investment support instruments: • Real estate tax or cost reduction:- difficult to implement- often under local government - large differences throughout the country PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  31. Action Plan: Objectives 2007: A broad support for a standard method to set up national support schemes for the acceleration of PV deployment 2008: Increased harmonisation of national support schemes for the acceleration of PV deployment PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  32. Action Plan: Targets 2007: • A support scheme recommended by the European Commission and supported by the PV Policy Group, EPIA and the PV Technology Platform; • A guideline describing how to set up an effective and controllable support scheme. • A common and generally accepted calculation method for the determination of a feed-in tariff • National position papers and action plans for setting up national support schemes for the acceleration of PV deployment PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  33. Action Plan: Targets 2008: • National support schemes based on the national position papers and national action plans in the countries participating in the PV Policy Group 2010: • National support schemes based on the European position paper and the European action plan in all EU member states PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  34. Action Plan: Steps • Tuning with WG1 (Policy and Instruments) and WG2 (Market) of the PV Technology Platform; • Tuning with the PV Technology Platform – Mirror Group; • Presentation for the PV Technology Platform; • Discussion wit the EC – TREN on the publication of a Recommended approach for the support of market implementation of PV energy systems; PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  35. Action Plan: Steps • Formulation of a recommended support scheme; • Organisation of a conference for high level government officials, presenting and elucidating the recommended approach for the support of market implementation of PV energy systems; • formulation of national position papers and national action plans. PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

  36. Action Plan: Budget PV Policy Group - Thematic WG - 2nd meeting

More Related