1 / 18

Interactional corrective feedback in L1 & L2 learning

Interactional corrective feedback in L1 & L2 learning. Krakow 2006 Mina Drever, consultant, Training and Development Agency for schools, London. Competence: implications for Language Education Framework. Assessment & competence. Why correct errors?. Self-repair

jui
Download Presentation

Interactional corrective feedback in L1 & L2 learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Interactional corrective feedback in L1 & L2 learning Krakow 2006 Mina Drever, consultant, Training and Development Agency for schools, London

  2. Competence: implications for Language Education Framework

  3. Assessment & competence

  4. Why correct errors? • Self-repair • Assist transitional competence • Develop metalinguistic awareness • Avoid fossilisation

  5. Whaterrors? • Corder’s systematic errors When? • immediately? / defer? How? • implicitly? / explicitly?

  6. Corrective feedback dimensions

  7. Most effective feedback in L2 • Locate errors • Immediate rejection + repetition of error in emphatic tone • Metalinguistic explanation > self-correction • Rephrase original question if no self-correction • Peer assistance if no self-correction

  8. Least successful feedback • Exact repetition of error • Expansion • Mixed • Intonation • idiosyncrasy

  9. Empirical enquiry: corrective feedback • 33 education authorities • 65 primary schools – 1 teacher in each • 33 schools > questionnaire • 33 schools > interview • Cross-validation • Observation study: 8 questionnaire schools

  10. Feedback type by 65 teachers

  11. Feedback to speaking

  12. Cross-validated findings: 8 questionnaire teachers’ observed feedback in recorded lessons

  13. Learner errors corrected covertly

  14. Confusing feedbackCVN = covert negativeCON = covert overt negativeCNP = covert negative positive

  15. Feedback dilemma This reveals what must be a source of ambiguity for young L2 learners as well as a dilemma for teachers whose mandate is to teach both language and content: namely, how to reinforce the substantive content of student messages while giving them clear messages about language form Lyster, 1998, p 71

  16. Covert Negative Positive: example 8 utterances on Christmas

  17. Error correction: 6 children’s attitudes to error correction at 3 different times over a period of 10 lessons

  18. Conclusion: corrective feedback • metalinguistic √ • Recasts X • Idiosyncratic ? • Confusing ?

More Related