1 / 13

Analyzing the Effectiveness of Climate Change Policies: A Critical Review

This analysis breaks down a written work on climate change policies to assess its validity and effectiveness. The title reflects the focus on evaluating the impact of climate change measures. The author delves into the qualifications and background of the writer to ascertain credibility. The mode of publication is a web article, targeting environmentally conscious readers. The publisher is a reputable news source, ensuring reliable information. The discourse serves the interests of environmentalists and policymakers. The article aims to evaluate the effectiveness of climate change policies with a critical lens. The rhetoric modes include ethos, logos, and pathos to engage the audience effectively. Logical fallacies are scrutinized to ensure sound reasoning. The writing quality, language use, and overall effectiveness are evaluated to determine if the article achieves its intended purpose.

judah-clayton
Download Presentation

Analyzing the Effectiveness of Climate Change Policies: A Critical Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Analysis Breaking down a written work into its individual parts to test its validity and effectiveness.

  2. Title • What is the title of the work? • Why is it titled the way that it is? • Are there charged words/ ideas within the title?

  3. Author • Who is the author? • Why is he/she qualified to write about the topic? • Does he/she have a history which would affect this?

  4. Mode of Publication • Web Article • Blog • Journal Article • Academic Journal • Newspaper Article • Magazine Article

  5. Publisher • Self Published • News Source • FOX News • MSNBC • Huffington Post • USA Today • Jamestown Post Journal

  6. Target Audience • Environmentalist/ Economist • Age group • Democrat/ Republican • Special Interest

  7. Bias • Whom does this discourse serve? • Who will benefit from this article? • Who will be hurt by it?

  8. Thesis of the Article • What was the goal of the article? • Why do you believe this to be true?

  9. Modes of Rhetoric • Ethos • Validity of its sources • Author • Past record • Logos • Information/ Statistics • Clear and understandable logic • Logical Fallacies?

  10. Pathos • Does it spark the attention and caring of the audience? • Do the stories seem representative of the whole? • Are the stories real/ hypothetical? • Is there enough/ not enough emotion?

  11. Logical Fallacies • https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/03/

  12. Writing • Was it well written? • Easy to follow? • Error free? • Language • Charged • Exciting/ boring • Fair/ biased

  13. Effectiveness • Overall, did the writing accomplish its goal? • Remember to go back to its thesis and purpose. • This is not about whether or not you liked it, but about whether or not it was effective.

More Related