1 / 17

ME0 stack options – preview of a GMM talk

ME0 stack options – preview of a GMM talk. In Shashlik and CFCAL HE designs, space of D z~30 cm exists behind 10 lambda for muons 30 cm typically allows 2 overlapping chambers, each of thickness 10 cm plus 4+4 cm on each side for borated polyethylene and Pb shielding for neutrons

josiah
Download Presentation

ME0 stack options – preview of a GMM talk

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ME0 stack options – preview of a GMM talk • In Shashlik and CFCAL HE designs, space of Dz~30 cm exists behind 10 lambda for muons • 30 cm typically allows • 2 overlapping chambers, each of thickness 10 cm • plus 4+4 cm on each side for borated polyethylene and Pb shielding for neutrons • On the other hand, in HGCAL, a tail catcher of hadron showers is currently implemented as potentially dual purpose with ME0 muon detection • In fact this design is not being used for muon reconstruction yet • Some thoughts following conversations with Valeri Andreev, Roger R, Marcello M, Archana, Karl Gill, Alain Herve, Pawel…

  2. High Rapidity Muon (HRM) layout • Proposed at ECFA workshop

  3. Nose engineering drawing • Support of HE mechanical load and moment: Bolts at outer radius Sliding joint to strong back at inner radius

  4. Current ME0 “stack” cartoons • Version A) Shashlik and CFCAL sims: 1x6 layer chambers, HE support from sliding joint to fixed-r conn. to strong back: requires ME0 inner, outer sections • Version B) HGCAL sim: 4x1 layer chambers, 0.47 l and 5.1 X0 between measurements 3.45 cm Brass absorber HE strong back - stainless Brass spacer ~10 cm 0.90 cm Brass absorber 3.45 cm 0.90 cm Brass spacer 2.5 borated polyethylene 1.2 Pb for n shielding ~4 cm … 34.8 cm ~36 cm 6-layer chambers 6-layer chambers ~8 cm ~8 cm ~4 cm muon

  5. From Virdee Euroschool 2003… tail catching

  6. Comments on versions A and B A (6-layer chambers): •  Pros • “Traditional” muon chamber design like CSC, DT • 6 muon layers versus 4 layers • Internal alignment is precise • Cost savings • Lots of space to bring ME0 services, cables •  Cons • Likely not a good HE calorimeter tail catcher • Mechanical support is more complicated B (single layer chambers) •  Pros • Good HE calorimeter tail catcher • Simple mechanical support •  Cons • 4 muon layers versus 6 layers • Alignment concerns • Increased cost • Almost no space for ME0 services except at outer periphery, extremely thin packages required

  7. Other possibilities • Version C) 3x2 layer chambers, 0.54 l and 6.0 X0 between chamber measurements • Version D) 2x 3 layer chambers, 0.77 l and 8.6 X0 between chamber measurements Brass absorber 3.4 cm 4.5 cm 2-layer m Brass spacer 2.3 cm 4.0 cm Brass absorber 3.4 cm 2-layer m Brass spacer 2.3 cm 4.5 cm 34.2 cm … 4.0 cm 34 cm Brass absorber Brass absorber … Brass spacer Brass spacer 3-layer m 3-layer m Brass absorber Brass absorber Brass spacer Brass spacer 3-layer m 3-layer m

  8. Comments on Versions C and D C (3 x 2layer chambers) •  Pros • Familiarity with 2-layer packages from GE1/1 etc • Pretty good HE tail catcher •  Cons • Thicker brass spacers – is it a mechanical problem? D (2 x 3layer chambers) •  Pros • Muon radiation isolation between successive chambers (more X0 in brass, is it enough?) • Fair HE tail catcher •  Cons • Unfamiliar package • Even thicker brass spacers – is it a mechanical problem?

  9. Variant of ME0 stack that staggers 2-layer units • Version E) 2-layer units increases lever arm/pointing by a factor 2 • 2-layer units also convenient for construction (similar to GE1/1) • In Shashlik and CFCAL sims: 1x6 layer chambers 2-layer m 2-layer m 2-layer m 2-layer m 2-layer m 2-layer m HE strong back - stainless HE strong back - stainless ~10 cm ~10 cm 2.5 borated polyethylene 1.2 Pb for n shielding 2.5 borated polyethylene 1.2 Pb for n shielding ~4 cm ~4 cm 2-3.2 cm ~36 cm ~36 cm 6-layer chambers 6-layer chambers ~8 cm ~17 cm ~8 cm ~7 cm ~4 cm ~4 cm

  10. Finally, ME0 segmentation • ME0 is used for muons to link to inner Tracker tracks • Especially at highest eta, Tracker uses endcap pixel disks • Error ellipse is therefore likely to be rather round • Pads, therefore, are better for matching than narrow strips • This also favors use as a tail catcher in a projective calorimeter • But ignores the possibility of modest rejection of low-Pt muon candidates • Skinny radial strips best for this • Studies are needed to identify the dominant effect?

  11. Conclusions - suggestions • Verify the numbers, at least approximately • Try to install version A stack in HGCAL sim for now • HE: tail catcher capability doesn’t see to be high priority for studies, HGCAL group has expressed their flexibility • “Give” or at least “lend” the 34.8 cm space in z (and the cost) to the muon community for optimization • Z= 5193 – 5541 mm in present HGCAL (V.Andreev xml layout) • Later on, versions C (3 x 2layer HE-like) and E (staggered 3 x 2-layer muon units) look to be attractive alternatives for all HE choices

  12. Backup slides

  13. From the TDR of the HCAL

  14. Behind the calculations • Brass density 8.4-8.73 (casting, rolling variations) • Composition 63% Cu and 37% Zn by weight • At 8.4, density of Cu=5.292 g/cm3, density of Zn 3.108 g/cm3 • At 8.73, reduce interaction and rad lengths by 3.93% • Interaction lengths, radiation lengths • Cu l=137.3 g/cm2, X0=12.86 g/cm2 • Zn l=138.5 g/cm2, X0=12.43 g/cm2 • Interactions add up weighted average of the r/l and r/X0 • For 63/37 brass, calculatel=16.4 cm, X0=1.511 cm

  15. Valeri vs. my l calculations Valeri • 1.0 l for EE • 0.3 l for EE stainless back • 4.0 l for Si-brass • 4.15 l for Scint-brass • 9.45 l in front of GEM • 1.85 l for GEM-brass Me: • 1.0 l for EE (take as a given) • 0.3 l for EE stainless back • 3.9-4.07 l for Si-brass • 4.28-4.45 l for Scint-brass • 9.48-9.82 l in front of GEM (or 0.03-0.37l higher) • 1.90-1.98 l for GEM-brass

  16. Stack cartoon ruler • (0, 5, 10, … cm)

More Related