light scattering n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Light Scattering PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Light Scattering

Light Scattering

1430 Views Download Presentation
Download Presentation

Light Scattering

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Light Scattering Rayleigh Scattering & Mie Scattering

  2. Theory • Characteristics of Polystyrene and Sulphur Nanoparticles. -- Non absorbing -- Refractive index is a weak function of wavelength. • How does light interact with objects? -- Reflection (light deviated from its original path) -- Refraction -- Diffraction -- Absorption (light absorbed and converted to heat)

  3. Theory Cont… • A collimated light source is the most basic tool for nanoparticle work. Often called a Tyndall beam. • The Tyndall effect is the scattered path of light observed in the suspension. Examples: Milk, smoke, Lake Thunderbird. • Scattering Plane -- The scattering plane is defined by the two rays involved, the source-particle ray and the particle-observer ray. -- The scattering plane is determined by observation, it is not fixed in space. For example, if the observer moves, the scattering plane will move with the observer.

  4. Theory Cont…. • Theory of Rayleigh -- Particles are treated as electric dipole. • Results: -- I1/ λ4 (only true if the refractive index is a weak function of λ, i.e. not a metal.) -- Ir6 -- scattered light at 90° is linearly polarized perpendicular to the scattering plane. Verticle Source Polarization Horizontal Source Polarization

  5. Theory Cont… • Mie Scattering -- Absorption and Scattering by a Sphere. -- Multipole expansion (EM modes of a sphere) -- electric dipole. -- magnetic dipole, electric quadrupole. -- magnetic quadrupole, electric octupole. • If d < λ/20 then only the first term (dipole) is needed. In this limiting case, Mie’s theory reduces to Rayleigh’s theory. • Efficiency factors: Qsca, Qabs, Qext • Plot Qext vs λ for the extinction spectra • Qsca and Qabs vs λ show their contribution to Qext. • Intensity for perpendicular and parallel polarized light • Plot I vs θ for the angular intensity dependence for each polarization.

  6. Objective • Learn about Scattering plane • The Polarization of Rayleigh Scattering • Mie Scattering • Angular Dependence

  7. Procedure Rayleigh scattering • Using a light source and polarization lens we observed the way light rays are polarized through rayleigh scattering in different solutions: Silica SOL, Sulfur SOL and Fine Sulfur particles, by shining the light source through the solutions • Shine light source though solutions in a dark room • Place polarized lens in path of light source to observe polarization effects of scattered light in the scattering plane and outside of scattering plane, I.E. view from top (90 degrees) and other angles of observation

  8. Higher Order Tyndall Spectra (HOTS) • Using the same procedure to observe the Rayleigh scattering effects, observe the different colors associated with the scattered light and observe angle dependency • Note the number of orders in each sample, one order is one color change from red to green

  9. Scattering Angle • Using the Helium Neon laser apparatus (wavelength = 543.5 mm) the laser beam was shone through our samples of polystyrene latex • The samples were placed at an angle on the observation stage to avoid multiple reflection of the laser beam in the same area of the solution • Note the minimum intensity zones in the scattered light by observing in the horizontal plane and recording the angle these minima occur. This was done by observing from about 35 degrees to 145 degrees from the laser beam in the scattering plane. See picture Laser Sample Observation stage with angle measurement site

  10. Optical Microscopy • Using an optical microscope in dark field observation mode, observe the nanoparticles in each of the three samples • Note their movement and size (each sample resembles a night sky filled with stars, the particles can be seen but not studied in detail)

  11. Results: Rayleigh Scattering • Silica SOL • With the vertical polarization lens in place we noticed there is no angular dependence in the scattering plane • By using a second polarization lens at a 90 degree angle we verified that the light is polarized perpendicular to the scattering plane • Sulphur SOL • Using the same techniques we noted the HOTS followed slightly different result patterns, there was significantly more forward scattering which caused the scattered light to blend together and appear simply white toward larger scattering angles in the scattering plane • Polystyrene latex • By observing each of the three samples and noting their order using the HOTS phenomenon we ranked the sample by particle size from smallest to largest as follows: Sample C, Sample B, Sample A (This initial ranking seemed to be correct according to our scattering angle experiment data)

  12. Observation

  13. Results: Scattering Angle • Sample C • No minimum were found in this sample although the intensity significantly decreased as the viewing angle decreased, this result is consistant with the Mie plot data • Estimated particle size <240 nm • Sample B • Minima recorded at scattering angles of 54 and 96 degrees • Estimated particle size  600nm • Sample A • Minima recorded at 50, 74 and 98 degrees • Estimated particle size  1060 nm

  14. Mie plot results Sample C: Particle size < 240nm Sample A: Particle size = 1060nm ~ 50 Intensity decreases as angle increases ~74 ~98 Sample B: Particle size = 600nm ~54 ~ 96

  15. Experiment discussion • Experimentally determined particle size • Sample A: Particle size  1060 nm • Sample B: Particle size  600 nm • Sample C: Particle size  < 240 nm • Error and procedure improvement suggestions • Lab results were recorded by human observation of three different lab technicians, humans always make mistakes • These results could be improved my taking more measurements and averaging results • Mono-dispersed vs. Poly-dispersed HOTS • A more highly dispersed sample would appear more “milky” under observation, that is to say the light spectrum would be blended together and appear more like white light instead a showing distinct wavelengths