1 / 14

Communicating Europe Seminar hosted by Britain in the New Europe

Communicating Europe Seminar hosted by Britain in the New Europe. James Humphreys Woodnewton Associates June 2008. This Seminar was held to explore the current state of the debate on the European Union in the UK and the context of public opinion. Research. Lowest in EU27.

jersey
Download Presentation

Communicating Europe Seminar hosted by Britain in the New Europe

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Communicating EuropeSeminar hosted by Britain in the New Europe James Humphreys Woodnewton Associates June 2008 Woodnewton Associates +44 207 837 0048 www.woodnewton.eu

  2. This Seminar was held to explore the current state of the debate on the European Union in the UK and the context of public opinion Woodnewton Associates +44 207 837 0048 www.woodnewton.eu

  3. Research Woodnewton Associates +44 207 837 0048 www.woodnewton.eu

  4. Lowest in EU27 Membership of the EU (1) Q) Generally speaking, do you think that (COUNTRY’S) membership of the European Union is EU27 UK A good thing 58% 34% A bad thing 13% 28% Neither good nor bad 25% 31% Don’t know 4% 7% (EUROBAROMETER, Autumn 07) Woodnewton Associates +44 207 837 0048 www.woodnewton.eu

  5. Joint lowest in EU27 (with Cyprus) Spring 07: 44% UK “benefited” Membership of the EU (2) Q) Taking everything into account, would you say that (COUNTRY) has on balance benefited or not from being a member of the European Union? EU27 UK Benefited 58% 37% Not benefited 29% 47% Don’t know 13% 16% (EUROBAROMETER, Autumn 07) Woodnewton Associates +44 207 837 0048 www.woodnewton.eu

  6. Trust Q) For each of the following institutions, please tell me if you tend to trust it or tend not to trust it. EU27 UK European Parliament 55% 25% European Commission 50% 22% European Union 48% 25% National Parliament 35% 34% National Government 34% 30% (EUROBAROMETER, Autumn 07) Woodnewton Associates +44 207 837 0048 www.woodnewton.eu

  7. Influence Q) Please tell me for each statement, whether you tend to agree or tend to disagree…. % Tend to agree EU27 UK (OUR COUNTRY’s) voice counts in the EU 61% 47% My voice counts in the EU 30% 17% (EUROBAROMETER, Autumn 07) Woodnewton Associates +44 207 837 0048 www.woodnewton.eu

  8. Q) What do you think are the two most important issues facing (COUNTRY) at the moment? People’s Concerns EU27 UK Unemployment Rising prices / inflation Crime Healthcare system Economic situation Immigration Pensions Terrorism Education system Taxation Housing Protecting environment Energy related issues Defence/foreign affairs (EUROBAROMETER, Autumn 07) Woodnewton Associates +44 207 837 0048 www.woodnewton.eu

  9. Q For each of the following areas, do you think that the decisions should be made by the (NATIONAL) Government, or made jointly within the European Union? National Government or Jointly with EU? % Jointly within EU % Nat Government Education Taxation Pensions Economy Unemployment Health and social welfare Transport Fighting inflation Fighting crime Agriculture & fisheries Defence & Foreign Affairs Immigration Consumer Protection Competition Energy Support for regions facing economic difficulty Science and technological research Environment Fighting terrorism Woodnewton Associates +44 207 837 0048 www.woodnewton.eu 6 5 Base: 2,362 TT adults, March - April 2008

  10. Q) European integration has been focusing on various issues in the last three years. In your opinion, which aspects should be emphasised by the European institutions in the coming years to strengthen the European Union in the future? EU Priorities EU27 UK The fight against crime Immigration issues Environment issues Energy issues Social issues Solidarity with poorer regions European foreign policy The Internal market European defence policy Scientific research European education policy Cultural policy (EUROBAROMETER, Autumn 07) Woodnewton Associates +44 207 837 0048 www.woodnewton.eu

  11. Analysis Woodnewton Associates +44 207 837 0048 www.woodnewton.eu

  12. Analysis: Priorities • UK public has clear set of social policy priorities: crime, immigration, terrorism, and so on • These are very different from most of Europe: economy, employment, and so on (though growing economic uncertainty in the UK may be closing this gap) • UK public priorities also don’t match those of the UK Government: Single Market, UK’s greatest ‘win’, only priority of 5% of the public • But UK public is open to greater EU role in its priority areas: notably crime, terrorism, immigration, and environment • UK public keener on co-operation in most of these areas than Government (terrorism, immigration) Woodnewton Associates +44 207 837 0048 www.woodnewton.eu

  13. Analysis: Trust • UK public has low levels of trust in EU, even allowing for general distrust of government and politics in UK and worldwide • Low levels of trust usually associated with lack of understanding or familiarity • But research also suggests that views on EU have firmed up • So engagement with public is difficult: they don’t feel they understand EU, but do have firm views about it; and so are not that open to new information or persuasion Woodnewton Associates +44 207 837 0048 www.woodnewton.eu

  14. Conclusions • The research suggests that: • The public is mistrustful about the EU and direct ‘rebuttal’ tends to miss the point – fears about curly cucumbers are a symptom, not a cause, of mistrust • More productive approach would be to add to people’s knowledge, not challenge their preconceptions • In any case, the public is open to EU action in particular areas • So EU could engage more by changing the terrain of discussion: away from the single market and into environment, crime, consumers, etc • But a factual approach alone would not work; the EU would have to show it was on the side of ordinary people in the UK, as it to some extent it did in the 1980s/1990s • It also needs to challenge the perception of remoteness: for example, instead of shuttling from Brussels to Strasbourg, the Parliament could come to London or Birmingham Woodnewton Associates +44 207 837 0048 www.woodnewton.eu

More Related