1 / 31

CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 3

CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 3. Paolo Ferracin ( paolo.ferracin@cern.ch ) European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN ). Case study 3. High field - large aperture magnet for a cable test facility Introduction

jermaine-rush
Download Presentation

CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CERN Accelerator SchoolSuperconductivity for AcceleratorsCase study 3 Paolo Ferracin (paolo.ferracin@cern.ch) European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN)

  2. Case study 3 Case study 3 • High field - large aperture magnet for a cable test facility • Introduction • High field (Bbore>10 T) magnets are needed to upgrade existing accelerators in Europe and to prepare for new projects on a longer timescale. • Nb3Sn is today the right candidate to meet those objectives, because of its superconducting properties and its industrial availability. • On the very long term, further upgrades could require dipole magnets with a field of around 20 Tesla (T): a possible solution is to combine an outer Nb3Sn coil with an inner coil of High Critical Temperature (HTS) conductor, both contributing to the field. • In addition, an high-field dipole magnet with a large aperture could be used to upgrade the Fresca test facility at CERN, in the aim of meeting the strong need to qualify conductor at higher fields. • Goal • Design a superconducting dipole with an 100 mm aperture and capable of reaching 15 T at 1.9 K (~90% of Iss).

  3. Case study 3 Case study 3 • High field - large aperture magnet for a cable test facility • Questions • Determine maximum gradient and coil size (using sector coil scaling laws) • Define strands and cable parameters • Strand diameter and number of strands • Cu to SC ratio and pitch angle • Cable width, cable mid-thickness and insulation thickness • Filling factor κ • Determine load-line (no iron) and “short sample” conditions • Compute jsc_ss, jo_ss, Iss, Bss, Bpeak_ss • Determine “operational” conditions (80% of Iss) and margins • Compute jsc_op, jo_op, Iop, Bop, Bpeak_op • Compute T, jsc, Bpeak margins • Compare “short sample”, “operational” conditions and margins if the same design uses Nb-Ti superconducting technology • Define a possible coil lay-out to minimize field errors • Determine e.m forces Fx and Fyand the accumulated stress on the coil mid-plane in the operational conditions (80% of Iss) • Evaluate dimension iron yoke, collars and shrinking cylinder, assuming that the support structure is designed to reach 90% of Iss

  4. Case study 3 Case study 3 • Additional questions • Evaluate, compare, discuss, take a stand (… and justify it …) regarding the following issues • High temperature superconductor: YBCO vs. Bi2212 • Superconducting coil design: block vs. cos • Support structures: collar-based vs. shell-based • Assembly procedure: high pre-stress vs. low pre-stress

  5. Case study 3 Case study 3 • High field - large aperture magnet for a cable test facility • Questions • Determine maximum gradient and coil size (using sector coil scaling laws) • Define strands and cable parameters • Strand diameter and number of strands • Cu to SC ratio and pitch angle • Cable width, cable mid-thickness and insulation thickness • Filling factor κ • Determine load-line (no iron) and “short sample” conditions • Compute jsc_ss, jo_ss, Iss, Bss, Bpeak_ss • Determine “operational” conditions (80% of Iss) and margins • Compute jsc_op, jo_op, Iop, Bop, Bpeak_op • Compute T, jsc, Bpeak margins • Compare “short sample”, “operational” conditions and margins if the same design uses Nb-Ti superconducting technology • Define a possible coil lay-out to minimize field errors • Determine e.m forces Fx and Fyand the accumulated stress on the coil mid-plane in the operational conditions (80% of Iss) • Evaluate dimension iron yoke, collars and shrinking cylinder, assuming that the support structure is designed to reach 90% of Iss

  6. Case study 3 solutionMaximum field and coil size Case study 3 • The max. field that one could reach with 60 mm wide coil is about 16.5 T

  7. Case study 3 solutionMaximum gradient and coil size Case study 3 • With a w/r of 60/50 = 1.2 λof 1.04

  8. Case study 3 solutionMaximum gradient and coil size Case study 3

  9. Case study 3 Case study 3 • High field - large aperture magnet for a cable test facility • Questions • Determine maximum gradient and coil size (using sector coil scaling laws) • Define strands and cable parameters • Strand diameter and number of strands • Cu to SC ratio and pitch angle • Cable width, cable mid-thickness and insulation thickness • Filling factor κ • Determine load-line (no iron) and “short sample” conditions • Compute jsc_ss, jo_ss, Iss, Bss, Bpeak_ss • Determine “operational” conditions (80% of Iss) and margins • Compute jsc_op, jo_op, Iop, Bop, Bpeak_op • Compute T, jsc, Bpeak margins • Compare “short sample”, “operational” conditions and margins if the same design uses Nb-Ti superconducting technology • Define a possible coil lay-out to minimize field errors • Determine e.m forces Fx and Fyand the accumulated stress on the coil mid-plane in the operational conditions (80% of Iss) • Evaluate dimension iron yoke, collars and shrinking cylinder, assuming that the support structure is designed to reach 90% of Iss

  10. Case study 3 solutionCable and strand size • We assume a strand diameter of 0.80 mm • We assume a pitch angle of 17 Case study 3

  11. Case study 3 solutionCable and strand size • We assume • Thick. Comp. = -12 % • Width. Comp. = -1.5 % • 35 strands • Ins. Thick. = 150 μm • We obtain • Cable width: 15 mm • Cable mid-thick.: 1.4 mm Case study 3

  12. Case study 3 solutionCable and strand size Case study 3 • Summary • Strand diameter =0.80 mm • Cu to SC ratio =1.1 • Pitch angle  =17 • N strands = 35 • Cable width: 15 mm • Cable mid-thickness: 1.4 mm • Insulation thickness = 150 μm • Area insulated conductor = 26.0 mm2 • We obtain a filling factor • k = area superconductor/area insulated cable = 0.31

  13. Case study 3 Case study 3 • High field - large aperture magnet for a cable test facility • Questions • Determine maximum gradient and coil size (using sector coil scaling laws) • Define strands and cable parameters • Strand diameter and number of strands • Cu to SC ratio and pitch angle • Cable width, cable mid-thickness and insulation thickness • Filling factor κ • Determine load-line (no iron) and “short sample” conditions • Compute jsc_ss, jo_ss, Iss, Bss, Bpeak_ss • Determine “operational” conditions (80% of Iss) and margins • Compute jsc_op, jo_op, Iop, Bop, Bpeak_op • Compute T, jsc, Bpeak margins • Compare “short sample”, “operational” conditions and margins if the same design uses Nb-Ti superconducting technology • Define a possible coil lay-out to minimize field errors • Determine e.m forces Fx and Fyand the accumulated stress on the coil mid-plane in the operational conditions (80% of Iss) • Evaluate dimension iron yoke, collars and shrinking cylinder, assuming that the support structure is designed to reach 90% of Iss

  14. Case study 3 solutionMargins Case study 3 • Let’s work now on the load-line • The bore field is given by • So, for a Jsc= 1000 A/mm2 • jo = jsc * k = 465 A/mm2 • Bbore = 12.8 T • Bpeak = Bbore * λ= 12.8 * 1.04 = 13.3 T

  15. Case study 3 solutionMargins • Nb3Sn parameterization • Temperature, field, and strain dependence of Jc is given by Summers’ formula • where Nb3Snis 900 for  = -0.003, TCmois 18 K, BCmois 24 T, and CNb3Sn,0is a fitting parameter equal to 60800 AT1/2mm-2 for a Jc=3000 A/mm2 at 4.2 K and 12 T. Case study 3

  16. Case study 3 solutionMargins • Nb-Ti parameterization • Temperature and field dependence of BC2 and TC are provided by Lubell’s formulae: • where BC20 is the upper critical flux density at zero temperature (~14.5 T), and TC0 is critical temperature at zero field (~9.2 K) • Temperature and field dependence of Jc is given by Bottura’s formula • where JC,Ref is critical current density at 4.2 K and 5 T (~3000 A/mm2) and CNb-Ti (27 T), Nb-Ti (0.63), Nb-Ti (1.0), and Nb-Ti (2.3) are fitting parameters. Case study 3

  17. Case study 3 solutionMargins Nb3Sn Case study 3 • Let’s assume  = 0.000 • The load-line intercept the critical (“short-sample” conditions) curve at • jsc_ss = 1230 mm2 • jo_ss = jsc_ss* k = 381 mm2 • Iss = jo_ss* Ains_cable= 9900 A • Bbore_ss = 15.8 T • Bpeak_ss = 16.4 T

  18. Case study 3 solutionMargins Nb3Sn Case study 3 • The operational conditions (80% of Iss) • jsc_op = 984 mm2 • jo_op = jsc_op* k = 305 mm2 • Iop = jo_op* Ains_cable= 7930 A • Bbore_op = 12.7 T • Bpeak_op = 13.2 T

  19. Case study 3 solutionMargins Nb3Sn Case study 3 • In the operational conditions (80% of Iss) • 4.6 K of T margin • (3000-984) A/mm2 of jscmargin • (17.2-13.2) T of field margin

  20. Case study 3 solutionMargins Nb-Ti Case study 3 • “Short-sample” conditions • jsc_ss = 850 mm2 • jo_ss= jsc_ss* k = 264 mm2 • Iss = jo_ss* Ains_cable= 6900 A • Bbore_ss = 11.0 T • Bpeak_ss = 11.4 T • The operational conditions (80% of Iss) • jsc_op = 680 mm2 • jo_op = jsc_op* k = 244 mm2 • Iop = jo_op* Ains_cable= 6350 A • Bbore_op = 8.8 T • Bpeak_op = 9.1 T • 2.1 K of T margin • (1850-680) A/mm2 of jscmargin • (11.5-9.1) T of field margin

  21. Case study 3 Case study 3 • High field - large aperture magnet for a cable test facility • Questions • Determine maximum gradient and coil size (using sector coil scaling laws) • Define strands and cable parameters • Strand diameter and number of strands • Cu to SC ratio and pitch angle • Cable width, cable mid-thickness and insulation thickness • Filling factor κ • Determine load-line (no iron) and “short sample” conditions • Compute jsc_ss, jo_ss, Iss, Bss, Bpeak_ss • Determine “operational” conditions (80% of Iss) and margins • Compute jsc_op, jo_op, Iop, Bop, Bpeak_op • Compute T, jsc, Bpeak margins • Compare “short sample”, “operational” conditions and margins if the same design uses Nb-Ti superconducting technology • Define a possible coil lay-out to minimize field errors • Determine e.m forces Fx and Fyand the accumulated stress on the coil mid-plane in the operational conditions (80% of Iss) • Evaluate dimension iron yoke, collars and shrinking cylinder, assuming that the support structure is designed to reach 90% of Iss

  22. Case study 3 solutionCoil layout Case study 3 • One wedge coil sets to zero b3 and b5 in quadrupoles • ~[0°-48°, 60°-72°] • ~[0°-36°, 44°-64°] • Some examples

  23. Case study 3 Case study 3 • High field - large aperture magnet for a cable test facility • Questions • Determine maximum gradient and coil size (using sector coil scaling laws) • Define strands and cable parameters • Strand diameter and number of strands • Cu to SC ratio and pitch angle • Cable width, cable mid-thickness and insulation thickness • Filling factor κ • Determine load-line (no iron) and “short sample” conditions • Compute jsc_ss, jo_ss, Iss, Bss, Bpeak_ss • Determine “operational” conditions (80% of Iss) and margins • Compute jsc_op, jo_op, Iop, Bop, Bpeak_op • Compute T, jsc, Bpeak margins • Compare “short sample”, “operational” conditions and margins if the same design uses Nb-Ti superconducting technology • Define a possible coil lay-out to minimize field errors • Determine e.m forces Fx and Fyand the accumulated stress on the coil mid-plane in the operational conditions (80% of Iss) • Evaluate dimension iron yoke, collars and shrinking cylinder, assuming that the support structure is designed to reach 90% of Iss

  24. Case study 3 solutionE.m. forces and stresses Case study 3 • For a dipole sector coil, with an inner radius a1, an outer radius a2 and an overall current density jo , each block (quadrant) see • Horizontal force outwards • Vertical force towards the mid-plan • In case of frictionless and “free-motion” conditions, no shear, and infinitely rigid radial support, the forces accumulated on the mid-plane produce a stress of

  25. Case study 3 solutionE.m. forces and stresses Case study 3 • In the operational conditions (Bbore_op = 12.7 T) • Fx (quadrant) = +5.68 MN/m • Fy (quadrant) = -4.89 MN/m • The accumulates stress on the coil mid-plane is

  26. Case study 3 Case study 3 • High field - large aperture magnet for a cable test facility • Questions • Determine maximum gradient and coil size (using sector coil scaling laws) • Define strands and cable parameters • Strand diameter and number of strands • Cu to SC ratio and pitch angle • Cable width, cable mid-thickness and insulation thickness • Filling factor κ • Determine load-line (no iron) and “short sample” conditions • Compute jsc_ss, jo_ss, Iss, Bss, Bpeak_ss • Determine “operational” conditions (80% of Iss) and margins • Compute jsc_op, jo_op, Iop, Bop, Bpeak_op • Compute T, jsc, Bpeak margins • Compare “short sample”, “operational” conditions and margins if the same design uses Nb-Ti superconducting technology • Define a possible coil lay-out to minimize field errors • Determine e.m forces Fx and Fyand the accumulated stress on the coil mid-plane in the operational conditions (80% of Iss) • Evaluate dimension iron yoke, collars and shrinking cylinder, assuming that the support structure is designed to reach 90% of Iss

  27. Case study 3 solutionDimension of the yoke Case study 3 • The iron yoke thickness can be estimated with • Therefore, being • Bbore = 14.2 T (at 90% of Iss ) • r = 50 mm and • Bsat= 2 T • we obtain • tiron = ~360 mm

  28. Case study 3 solutionDimension of the support structure Case study 3 • We assume a 25 mm thick collar • Images not in scale

  29. Case study 3 solutionDimension of the support structure • We assume that the shell will close the yoke halves with the same force as the total horizontal e.m. force at 90% of Iss • Fx_total = Fx_octant * 2 = +14.4 MN/m • Assuming an azimuthal shell stress after cool-down of • shell = 200 MPa • The thickness of the shell is • tshell = Fx_total/2/1000/ shell~ 36 mm Case study 3

  30. Case study 3 solutionMagnet cross-section Case study 3 • Coil inner radius: 50 mm • Coil outer radius: 110 mm • The operational conditions (80% of Iss) • jsc_op = 984 mm2 • jo_op = jsc_op* k = 305 mm2 • Iop = jo_op* Ains_cable= 7930 A • Bbore_op = 12.7 T • Bpeak_op = 13.2 T • Collar thickness: 25 mm • Yoke thickness: 330 mm • Shell thickness: 36 mm • OD: 1 m

  31. Comparison Case study 3

More Related