1 / 5

Dartmouth College vs. Woodward

By Joseph O’Brien. Dartmouth College vs. Woodward. Participants. Group of people with vested interests in Dartmouth. State approved secretary of the Board of Trustees. Trustees of Dartmouth College. William H. Woodward. The Issues.

jeri
Download Presentation

Dartmouth College vs. Woodward

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. By Joseph O’Brien Dartmouth College vs. Woodward

  2. Participants • Group of people with vested interests in Dartmouth • State approved secretary of the Board of Trustees Trustees of Dartmouth College William H. Woodward

  3. The Issues • The New Hampshire government tried to alter the royal charter of Dartmouth • The government was trying to have greater say in Dartmouth’s affairs • Could appoint president • Could add members to the board of trustees • Created a board of visitors • Had veto power over the trustees • Government tried to change Dartmouth from private to public • Trustees felt these actions were unconstitutional

  4. Decision • Ruled in favor of Dartmouth • Article 1, Section 10 of the Constitution • “Contract Clause” • Prohibits states from interfering with private contracts • Allowed Dartmouth to continue as a private institution

  5. Significance • Many states passed laws and constitutional amendments to retain the right to alter contracts • Set precedent that all alterations cannot hurt members of the contract (shareholders, founders, etc..) • Strengthened the contract clause

More Related