1 / 26

Social Security Literacy and Retirement Well-Being

Social Security Literacy and Retirement Well-Being. Hugo Benítez-Silva (SUNY-Stony Brook) Berna Demiralp (Old Dominion University) Zhen Liu (SUNY-Buffalo) UM09-11. Introduction and Motivation.

jenaya
Download Presentation

Social Security Literacy and Retirement Well-Being

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Social Security Literacy and Retirement Well-Being Hugo Benítez-Silva (SUNY-Stony Brook) Berna Demiralp (Old Dominion University) Zhen Liu (SUNY-Buffalo) UM09-11

  2. Introduction and Motivation • Financial Literacy has become an even more important issue with the events of the last year and a half • Social Security Literacy is still a relatively unexplored topic, while a high level of knowledge by individuals is an underlying assumption of most retirement models • Anecdotal evidence indicates the level of knowledge is not very high

  3. Contribution • We provide evidence of the level of basic knowledge about the Social Security Retirement System using two waves of a Survey funded by Stony Brook and MRRC • The second part of this project, assesses the effect on Well-Being of the lack of knowledge about the system using a Dynamic Life-Cycle Model of Retirement • We are also able to impute the cost of acquiring knowledge

  4. SB 2007-2008 Social Security Study • Two telephone surveys conducted at Stony Brook’s Center for Survey Research during August 2007 (funded with a Seed Grant from the V.P. for Research at SB), and December 2008 (funded by MRRC) • Samples of 500 and 507 observations, nationally representative. 179 observations of the 2008 survey were re-interviews

  5. What is the youngest age at which an eligible worker can apply for his or her own Social Security retirement benefits? (All respondents 2007 and 2008)

  6. What is the youngest age at which an eligible worker can apply for his or her own Social Security retirement benefits?

  7. What is the earliest age of retirement at which Social Security would pay you full, unreduced benefits?

  8. What is the maximum age at which you can claim Social Security retirement benefits so that Social Security will adjust your benefits upward [because of the delay in claiming benefits]?

  9. What is the minimum number of working years that qualify you to receive Social Security Retirement Benefits?

  10. If you earned $10,000 in a given year from working after you began receiving Social Security Retirement Benefits at age 62, do you think your Social Security benefits would be reduced?

  11. What about if you earned $20,000 in a given year from working after you began receiving Social Security Retirement Benefits at age 62, do you think your Social Security benefits would be reduced?

  12. The Dynamic Model (I) • We solve and simulate a Dynamic Life Cycle Model of Retirement Behavior under uncertainty • Individuals face life uncertainty, income uncertainty, health uncertainty, and employment uncertainty, and optimally choose how much to consume, save, work, and when to claim retirement benefits • We model in detail the U.S. retirement system and add unemployment insurance

  13. The Dynamic Model (II) The benchmark model does an excellent job at replicating the actual data on the proportion of individuals who claim benefits at each age. This model assumes individuals know and understand the complex incentive structure of the retirement system in the United States. We have shown this is hardly a realistic assumption, but can we assess whether the pervasive lack of knowledge is costing us much in terms of welfare.

  14. Actual vs. Simulated Retirement Claiming

  15. The Dynamic Model (III) One of the great advantages of utility based life-cycle models is that we can use them to perform welfare calculations, in which we compare the well-being of agents under different regimes We can, for example, use the model to compare the well-being under two different incentive structures, or as in this research under two different informational structures We can compare the benchmark model with a variety of possible informational structures

  16. The Dynamic Model (IV) We have re-solved and re-simulate the model assuming that individuals do not know the details of the retirement system, and behave mimicking the people around them. This means, for example, what when an individual reaches age 62, he does not make any complicated calculation to decide whether she should claim benefits, but behaves like the average person, who claims 52% of the times at that age. We know this behavior is suboptimal, but the key is to compute the welfare gain from information, and with that impute the cost that the individual is willing to bear to access that better level of information

  17. Results of the Model We find that a large proportion of individuals would gain from full-information. This proportion varies by age. Around 95% of those who are 60 years old would sharply benefit from better information. But only 28% of those who are 40. The welfare gain is computed in terms of willingness to pay out of the current level of wealth. Technically, we find that an average 60 year old who knows the rules of the system would have to be compensated with more than 50% of his current wealth in order to accept the suboptimal behavior we have explained. The result hinges on the particular informational structure we have assumed, but many others can be studied like for example assuming the consequences of thinking that the ERA is 63 or 64.

  18. A ranking of informational structures we are considering Complete ignorance (e.g. “I believe the youngest age cannot be anything other than 65”) Ignorance with awareness about ignorance (e.g. “I think it is 65, but I could be wrong.”) Ignorance with a prior (e.g. “I guess it is 65 with 50% chance being correct”) Accurate knowledge (e.g. “I am sure it is 62 and I have double checked”)

  19. How might incentives work with various informational structures • Copying the majority around • As in the current model • Optimizing with given information • Using given knowledge as constraints • Searching for extra information • Needs further assumptions on search costs • Hiring professionals • Needs further assumptions on agency costs

  20. Conclusions We find Americans have a limited knowledge of some of the basic rules of the Retirement System We find that a large proportion of Americans would strongly benefit from access to good information compared with suboptimal “me too” strategies which do not take into account the individual’s particular circumstances Informational structures can be key to assess the appropriateness and consequences of the policy changes analyzed in our models

More Related